skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3375218acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Children with Autism and Technology Use: A Case Study of the Diary Method

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we summarize our findings and recount lessons that we learned using the diary method in a pilot study exploring mobile app use among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Participants included two teachers and five parents. We found that the diary study method worked well to collect data about app use; however, the design of our study inadvertently introduced problems, especially for the participating parents. Problems included feelings of pressure among our participants for their children to engage with apps that they had little interest in. Collecting data about how children with ASD use commercially available technologies like mobile apps is challenging and requires experimentation of methods; this case study paper will help other researchers who are working with similar user groups in navigating these challenges.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. 2013.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing. https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ACM. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html Last accessed October 6, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Niels Van Berkel, Denzil Ferrera, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. The Experience Sampling Method on Mobile Devices. ACM Coput. Surv, 50,6, Article 93 https://doi.org/10.1145/3123988Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Niall Bolger and Jean-Phillipe Laurenceau. 2013. Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research, Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When participants do the capturing: the role of media in diary studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 899--908. DOI: https://doi10.1145/1054972.1055098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175--182. DOI= 0.1145/985692.985715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Eiji Hayashi and Jason Hong. 2011. A diary study of password usage in daily life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2627--2630. DOI: https://doi10.1145/1978942.1979326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Johnathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng and Harry Hocheiser. 2010. Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Julie A. Kientz, Shwetak N. Patel, Arwa Z. Tyebkhan, Brian Gane, Jennifer Wiley, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2006. Where's my stuff?: design and evaluation of a mobile system for locating lost items for the visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 103--110. DOI: https://doi-1145/1168987.1169006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Micah O. Mazurek, Paul T. Shattuck, Mary Wagner and Benjamin P. Cooper. 2013. Prevalence and correlates of screen-based media use among youths with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 8, 1757--1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-0111413--8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bridget Christine McHugh, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Mary Beth Rosson, Heng Xu, and John M. Carroll. 2017. Most Teens Bounce Back: Using Diary Methods to Examine How Quickly Teens Recover from Episodic Online Risk Exposure. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 76 (December 2017), 19 pages. DOI: https://doiorg.ezproxy.depaul.edu/10.1145/3134711Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cynthia Putnam and Lorna Chong. 2008. Software and technologies designed for people with autism: what do users want?. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--10. DOI: https://doi10.1145/1414471.1414475Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cynthia Putnam. Christina Hanshke, Jenny Todd, Jon Gemmell and Mia Kollia. 2019. Interactive Technologies Designed for Children with Autism: Reports of Use and Desires from Parents, Teachers and Therapists. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. Accepted May 2019, In press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Timothy Sohn, Kevin A. Li, William G. Griswold, and James D. Hollan. 2008. A diary study of mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 433--442. DOI: https://doi10.1145/1357054.1357125Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Children with Autism and Technology Use: A Case Study of the Diary Method

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        4474 pages
        ISBN:9781450368193
        DOI:10.1145/3334480

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 April 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format