skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3375216acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Post-Hackathon Learning Circles: Supporting Lean Startup Development

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hackathons provide rapid, hands-on opportunities to explore innovative solutions to problems, but provide little support to teams in moving those solutions into practice. We explore the use of post-hackathon Learning Circles to connect hackathon teams with key stakeholders, to reflect on prototypes and consider business models. We conducted a qualitative field study with 4 post-hackathon teams on the theme of technology, social isolation, and aging. Our results show that Learning Circles are an effective way to involve stakeholders early in the development process, and to develop a deeper understanding of users, markets, and technology.

References

  1. G. Briscoe and C. Mulligan, "Digital Innovation: The Hackathon Phenomenon," Creat. London Work. Pap. No.6, no. 6, pp. 1--13, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Warner and P. J. Guo, "Hack.edu?: Examining how college hackathons are perceived by student attendees and non-attendees," ICER '17 Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Int. Comput. Educ. Res., pp. 254--262, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Startup Commons, "Startup development phases," Grow VC Operations: Startup Commons, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.startupcommons.org/startupdevelopment-phases.html. [Accessed: 10-Oct2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Ries, The Lean Startup, 1st ed. New York, N.Y.: Crown Publishing Group, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Å. L. Dahlstrand and D. Politis, "Women business ventures in Swedish university incubators," Int. J. Gend. Entrep., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 78--96, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. K. D. Dwivedi, S. Upadhyay, and A. K. Tripathi, "A working framework for the user-centered design approach and a survey of available methods," Int. J. Sceintific Res. Publ., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 12--19, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Riel, J. Rhoads, and E. Ellis, "Culture of critique: Online learning circles and peer reviews in graduate education," Self, Peer Gr. Assess. ELearning, pp. 142--168, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. McBride and J. Good, "Learning circles: What is their potential in Aboriginal community economic development?," Prince George, B.C., 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Wade and M. Hammick, "Action Learning in Theory and in Practice," Teach. High. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163--178, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Bramwell, J. Nelles, and D. a. Wolfe, "Knowledge, innovation and institutions: Global and local dimensions of the ICT cluster in Waterloo, Canada," Reg. Stud., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 101--116, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. Lee, "Health hackathons," Int. J. Infect. Dis., vol. 53, no. 2016, p. 7, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Institute of Medicine, Patients charting the course: Citizen engagement in the learning health system. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. McNeil, J. McMurray, K. Byrne, K. Grindrod, and P. Stolee, "Engagement of older adults in regional health innovation: The ECOTECH concept mapping project," Manuscr. Submitt. Publ., 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Bramwell, "Making the most of collaboration: An international survey of public service co-design," London, U.K., 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Szebeko and L. Tan, "Co-designing for society," Australas. Med. J., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 580--590, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Bardzell, "Utopias of participation?: Feminism, design, and the futures," ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. - Spec. Issue Reimagining Particip. Des., vol. 25, no. 1, February 2018, pp. 1--24, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Hope et al., "Hackathons as participatory design: Interating feminist utopias," in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Corbin and A. L. Strauss, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Second., vol. 2. California, U.S.A.: Sage Publications Inc., 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. E. Enkel, J. Perez-Freije, and O. Gassmann, "Minimizing market risks through customer integration in new product development: Learning from bad practice," Creat. Innov. Manag., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 425--437, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. P. Lyndon et al., "Hacking hackathons: Preparing the next generation for the multidisciplinary world of healthcare technology," Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 112, no. October 2017, pp. 1--5, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. B. Granillo, R. Renger, J. Wakelee, and J. L. Burgess, "Utilization of the native American talking circle to teach incident command system to tribal community health representatives," J. Community Health, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 625--634, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. Levy, Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution. New York, USA: Dell Publishing, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Decker, K. Eiselt, and K. Voll, "Understanding and improving the culture of hackathons: Think global hack local," Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2014, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. E. Porter, C. Bopp, E. Gerber, and A. Voida, "Reappropriating hackathons: The production work of the CHI4Good Day of Service," Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. May 6--11, Denver, CO, pp. 810--814, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Arena, R. Cross, J. Sims, and M. Uhl-Bien, "How to catalyze innovation in your organization," MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 39--46, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. N. Taylor and L. Clarke, "Everybody's hacking: Participation and the mainstreaming of hackathons," Proc. CHI, pp. 1--12, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Post-Hackathon Learning Circles: Supporting Lean Startup Development

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        4474 pages
        ISBN:9781450368193
        DOI:10.1145/3334480

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 April 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format