skip to main content
10.1145/332040.332473acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Instrumental interaction: an interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 April 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article introduces a new interaction model called Instrumental Interaction that extends and generalizes the principles of direct manipulation. It covers existing interaction styles, including traditional WIMP interfaces, as well as new interaction styles such as two-handed input and augmented reality. It defines a design space for new interaction techniques and a set of properties for comparing them. Instrumental Interaction describes graphical user interfaces in terms of domain objects and interaction instruments. Interaction between users and domain objects is mediated by interaction instruments, similar to the tools and instruments we use in the real world to interact with physical objects. The article presents the model, applies it to describe and compare a number of interaction techniques, and shows how it was used to create a new interface for searching and replacing text.

References

  1. 1.Ahlberg, C., Williamson, C., Shneiderman, B. Dynamic Queries for Information Exploration: An Implementation and Evaluation~ In Proc. A CM Human Factors in Computing Systems, CH1'92, ACM Press, p.619-626, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Apple Computer. Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines, Addison-Wesley, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Bederson, B. and Hollan, J. Pad++: A Zooming Graphical Interface for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics. In Proc. A CM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology, UIST'94, ACM Press, p. 17- 26, 1994 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Bederson, B., Hollan, J., Druin, A., Stewart, J., Rogers, D., Proft, D. Local Tools : an Alternative to Tool Palettes. In Proc. A CM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST'94, ACM Press, p. 169-170, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Bier, E., Stone, M., Pier, K., Buxton, W., De Rose, T. Toolglass and Magic Lenses : the See-Through Interface. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH, p.73-80, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.B~dker, S. Through the Interface. A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 199 I. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Card, S.K., Mackinlay, J.D., Robertson, G.G. A Morphological Analysis of the Design Space of Input Devices. A CM Trans. Information Systems, 9(2):99- 122, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Card, S., Mackinlay, J., Shneiderman, B. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Card, S., Robertson, G., Mackinlay, J. The information Visualizer, an Information Workspace. In Proc. A CM Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'91, ACM Press, p.181-187, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Fitzmaurice, G., Ishii, H., Buxton, W. Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces. In Proc. A CM Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'95, ACM Press, p.442-449, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Foley, J., Wallace, V., Chart, P. The Human Factors of Computer Graphics Interaction Techniques. Computer Graphics and Applications, 4(11): 13-48, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Gram, C. & Cockton, G. Design Principles for Interactive Software, Chapman & Hall, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Guiard, Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action' The kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19:486-517, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14.Heller, D., Ferguson, P.M., Brennan, D. Motif Programming Manual, O'Reilly & Associates, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Holland, S. & Oppenheim, D. Direct Combination. Proc. A CM Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'99, ACM Press, p.262-269, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Jacob, I. & Oliver, J. Evaluation of Techniques for Specifying 3D Rotations with a 2D Input Device. Proc. HCI'95 Conference, People and Computers X, p.63-76, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Jacob, R., Sibert, L., McFarlane, D., Preston Mullen, M. Integrability and Separability of Input Devices. A CM Trans. Human Computer Interaction, 1 (1), p.3- 26, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Krasner, G.E. & Pope, S.T. A Description of the Model-View-Controller User Interface Paradigm in the Smalltalk80 System. J. Object Oriented Programming 1 (3):26-49, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Kurtenbach, G. & Buxton, W. User Learning and Performance with Marking Menus. Proc. ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'94, ACM Press, p.258-264, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Kurtenbach, G., Fitzmaurice, G., Baudel, T., Buxton. W. The Design of a GUI Paradigm based on Tablets, Two-hands, and Transparency. In Proc. ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'97, ACM Press, p.35-42, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Kurtenbach, G., Fitzmaurice, G.W., Owen, R.N., Baudel, T. The Hotbox: efficient access to a large number of menu-items. Proc. ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'99, ACM Press, p.231-237, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Michotte, A. La perception de la causalitd. Publications Universitaires de Louvain, 1946.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Myers, B.A. A New Model for Handling Input. A CM Trans. Information Systems, 8(3):289-320, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Myers, B.A. User Interface Software Tools. A CM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 2( 1):64-103, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.Robertson, G.G. & Mackinlay, J.D. The Document Lens Visualizing Information. Proc. ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology, p. 101 - 108, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.Shneiderman, B. Direct Manipulation : a Step Beyond Programming Languages. 1EEE Computer, 16(8), pp 57-69, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Smith, D., Irby, C., Kimball, R., Verplank, B., Harslem E. Designing the Star User Interface. Byte, 7(4), p.242:282, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.Szekely, P., Luo. P., Neches, R.-Beyond Interface Builders: Model-Based Interface Tools Model-Based. Proc. A CM Human Factors in Computing Systems, INTERCHI'93, ACM Press, p.383-390, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.Took, R. Surface Interaction: A Paradigm and Model for Separating Application and Interface. Proc. A CM Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'90, ACM Press, p.35-42, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30.Wellner, P., Mackay, M., Gold R. Computer- Augmented Environments. Special lssue of Communications of the ACM, 23(7).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Instrumental interaction: an interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2000
      587 pages
      ISBN:1581132166
      DOI:10.1145/332040

      Copyright © 2000 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 April 2000

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '00 Paper Acceptance Rate72of336submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader