skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376171acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Self-Expression by Design: Co-Designing the ExpressiBall with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Expressing one's thoughts and feelings is a fundamental human need - the basis for communication and social interaction. We ask, how do minimally-verbal children on the autism spectrum express themselves? How can we better recognise instances of self-expression? And how might technologies support and encourage self-expression? To address these questions, we undertook co-design research at an autism-specific primary school with 20 children over one school year. This paper contributes six Modalities of Self-Expression, through which children self-express and convey their design insights. Each modality of self-expression can occur across two different dimensions (socio-expressive and auto-expressive) and can be of a fundamental or an integrative nature. Further, we contribute the design trajectory of a tangible ball prototype, the ExpressiBall, which - through voice, sounds, lights, and motion sensors - explores how tangible technologies can support this range of expressive modalities. Finally, we discuss the concept of Self-Expression by Design.

References

  1. Andrea Alessandrini, Victor Loux, Gabriel Ferreira Serra, and Cormac Murray. 2016. Designing ReduCat: AudioAugmented Paper Drawings Tangible Interface in Educational Intervention for High-Functioning Autistic Children. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '16), 463--472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Meryl Alper. 2017. Giving voice: Mobile communication, disability, and inequality. MIT Press, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Aloha Hufana Ambe, Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, and Paul Roe. 2017. Technology Individuation: The Foibles of Augmented Everyday Objects. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 6632--6644.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alissa N. Antle. 2008. Inquiring materials for tangible prototyping. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (TEI '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 139--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. AssistiveWare 'Proloquo2Go'. 2013. Retrieved July 14, 2019 from https://www.assistiveware.com/products/proloquo2goGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellie Bates, Kristy Evers, Lee Leewis, Jenny Zhou, Asimina Vasalou, Vali Lalioti, and Kandase Augustin. 2018. The bits & atoms of play: critical engagements with intercultural meaning making. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '18), 761--764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tilde Bekker, Janienke Sturm, Rik Wesselink, Bas Groenendaal, and Berry Eggen. 2008. Interactive play objects and the effects of open-ended play on social interaction and fun. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '08), 389--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Erna Blanche, Gustavo Imperatore, Megan Reinoso, Megan C. Chang, and Stefanie Bodison. 2012. Proprioceptive processing difficulties among children with autism spectrum disorders and developmental disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 66, 5: 621--624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Margot Brereton, Laurianne Sitbon, Muhammad Haziq Lim Abdullah, Mark Vanderberg, and Stewart Koplick. 2015. Design after design to bridge between people living with cognitive or sensory impairments, their friends and proxies. CoDesign 11,1 : 4--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Franceli L. Cibrian. 2016. Music therapy on interactive surfaces to improve sensorimotor problems of children with autism. SIGACCESS Transactions on Accessible Computing 114 (March 2016), 20--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tom Djajadiningrat, Ben Matthews, and Marcelle Stienstra. 2007. Easy doesn't do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 8, 657676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Paul Dourish. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children with Children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 592--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Carl J. Dunst. 1998. Sensorimotor development and developmental disabilities. Handbook of mental retardation and development, 135--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. eSafety Commission Website 'Safety by Design'. 2019. Retrieved August 10, 2019 from https://www.esafety.gov.au/esafety-information/safety-bydesignGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. William Farr, Nicola Yuill, Eric Harris, and Steve Hinske. 2010. In my own words: configuration of tangibles, object interaction and children with autism. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '10), 30--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Christina T. Fuentes, Stewart H. Mostofsky, and Amy J. Bastian. 2011. No proprioceptive deficits in autism despite movement-related sensory and execution impairments. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 41, no. 10: 1352--1361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Christopher Frauenberger, Julia Makhaeva, and Katharina Spiel. 2016. Designing Smart Objects with Autistic Children: Four Design Exposès. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16) 130--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Elisa Giaccardi and Elvin Karana. 2015. Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2447--2456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jenna Gillett-Swan and Jonathon Sargeant. 2018. Assuring children's human right to freedom of opinion and expression in education. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20,1 (2018),120--127Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mitchell S. Green. 2007. Self-expression. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mariellen Griffith. 1997. Empowering techniques of play therapy: A method for working with sexually abused children. Journal of Mental Health Counseling 19 (2): 130-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Clint Heyer and Margot Brereton. 2010. Design from the everyday: continuously evolving, embedded exploratory prototypes. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10), 282--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hanneke Hooft van Huysduynen, Linda de Valk, and Tilde Bekker. 2016. Tangible Play Objects: Influence of Different Combinations of Feedback Modalities. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16), 262--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. 2006. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 437--446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ole Sejer Iversen, Rachel Charlotte Smith, and Christian Dindler. 2017. Child As Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17), 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Carey Jewitt. 2013. Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In Price S and Jewitt C (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research, 250--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Brigitte Jordan and Austin Henderson. 1995. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Connie Kasari, Stephanny Freeman, and Tanya Paparella. 2006. Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: A randomized controlled intervention study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47, 6: 611--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Barbara Kawulich. 2005. Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method. Qualitative Social Research 6, 2 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wendy Keay-Bright and Imogen Howarth. 2012. Is simplicity the key to engagement for children on the autism spectrum?. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 2: 129--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Heejung S. Kim and Deborah Ko. 2007. Culture and selfexpression. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology: The self (pp. 325--342). New York, US: Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Garry L. Landreth. 2012. Play Therapy: The Art of the Relationship. (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Amanda Lazar, Jessica L. Feuston, Caroline Edasis, and Anne Marie Piper. 2018. Making As Expression: Informing Design with People with Complex Communication Needs Through Art Therapy. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Artcile 351, 16 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Susan R. Leekam, Carmen Nieto, Sarah J. Libby, Lorna Wing, and Judith Gould. 2007. Describing the sensory abnormalities of children and adults with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 37, 5 (2007), 894--910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Kevin Lefeuvre, Soeren Totzauer, Michael Storz, Albrecht Kurze, Andreas Bischof, and Arne Berger. 2018. Bricks, Blocks, Boxes, Cubes, and Dice: On the Role of Cubic Shapes for the Design of Tangible Interactive Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). 485--496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Julia Makhaeva, Christopher Frauenberger, and Katharina Spiel. 2016. Creating Creative Spaces for Co-designing with Autistic Children: The Concept of a "Handlungsspielraum". In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '16), 51--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Laura Malinverni, Edith Ackermann, and Narcis Pares. 2016. Experience as an Object to Think with: from Sensing-in-action to Making-Sense of action in Full-Body Interaction Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16), 332--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Laura Malinverni, Marie-Monique Schaper, and Narcis Pares. 2019. Multimodal methodological approach for participatory design of Full-Body Interaction Learning Environments. Qualitative Research 19, 1 (2019), 71--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Elysa J. Marco, L. B. Hinkley, Susanna S. Hill and Srikantan S. Nagarajan. 2011. Sensory processing in autism: A review of neurophysiologic findings. Paediatric Research, 69 (5 Part 2), 48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Nancy J. Minshew, Jessica Meyer, and Gerald Goldstein. 2002. Abstract reasoning in autism: A disassociation between concept formation and concept identification. Neuropsychology 16, 3 (2002), 327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Ulric Neisser. 1988. Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical psychology, 1(1): 35--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Antonella Nonnis and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2019. Mazi: Tangible Technologies as a Channel for Collaborative Play. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19) 440, 13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Marianna Obrist, Carlos Velasco, Chi Thanh Vi, Nimesha Ranasinghe, Ali Israr, Adrian D. Cheok, Charles Spence, and Ponnampalam Gopalakrishnakone. 2016. Touch, Taste, & Smell User Interfaces: The Future of Multisensory HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 3285--3292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Marianna Obrist, Elia Gatti, Emanuela Maggioni, Chi Thanh Vi, and Carlos Velasco. 2017. Multisensory experiences in HCI. IEEE MultiMedia 24, 2 (2017), 9--13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Deysi Helen Ortega, Franceli Linney Cibrian, and Mónica Tentori. 2015. BendableSound: a Fabric-based Interactive Surface to Promote Free Play in Children with Autism. In Proc. of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15), 315-Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jean Piaget. 2013. Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kenneth K. Poon, Linda R. Watson, Grace T. Baranek, and Michele D. Poe. 2012. To What Extent Do Joint Attention, Imitation, and Object Play Behaviors in Infancy Predict Later Communication and Intellectual Functioning in ASD? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42, 6 (Jun 2012), 1064--1074.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Barry M. Prizant, and Judith F. Duchan. 1981. The functions of immediate echolalia in autistic children. Journal of speech and hearing disorders 46, 3 (1981), 241--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Nicolas Rasamimanana, Frédéric Bevilacqua, Julien Bloit, Norbert Schnell, Emmanuel Fléty, Andrea Cera, Uros Petrevski, and Jean-Louis Frechin. 2012. The urban musical game: using sport balls as musical interfaces. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA '12), 1027--1030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Kathryn E. Ringland, Rodrigo Zalapa, Megan Neal, Lizbeth Escobedo, Monica E. Tentori, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2014. SensoryPaint: a natural user interface supporting sensory integration in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14), 1681--1686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Kathryn E. Ringland, LouAnne Boyd, Heather Faucett, Amanda L.L. Cullen, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2017. Making in Minecraft: A Means of Self-Expression for Youth with Autism. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17) 340--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2015. Pass the Ball: Enforced Turn-Taking in Activity Tracking. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2417--2426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology 25, 1: 54--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Daniel Salber, and Joëlle Coutaz. 1993. Applying the wizard of oz technique to the study of multimodal systems. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 753: 219--230, Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Laura Scheepmaker, Christopher Frauenberger, and Katta Spiel. 2018. The Things We Play with Roles of Technology in Social Play. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '18), 451462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Katta Spiel, Julia Makhaeva, and Christopher Frauenberger. 2016. Embodied Companion Technologies for Autistic Children. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16) 245--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Miguel Sicart. Play matters. MIT Press, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Steve Silberman. Neurotribes: The legacy of autism and the future of neurodiversity. Penguin, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Helen Tager-Flusberg and Connie Kasari. 2013. Minimally Verbal School--Aged Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Neglected End of the Spectrum. Autism Research 6, 6: 468--478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Jelle van Dijk, Remko van der Lugt, and Caroline Hummels. 2014. Beyond distributed representation: embodied cognition design supporting socio-sensorimotor couplings. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14), 181--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Jelle van Dijk and Caroline Hummels. 2017. Designing for Embodied Being-in-the-World: Two Cases, Seven Principles and One Framework. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '17), 47--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Lilia Villafuerte, Milena Markova and Sergi Jorda. 2012. Acquisition of social abilities through musical tangible user interface: children with autism spectrum condition and the Reactable. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12), 745--760.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Lev S. Vygotsky. 1967. Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet psychology 5, 3 (1967), 6--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Alan Waterman, Seth Schwartz and Regina Conti. 2008. The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1: 41--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Gil Weinberg, Maggie Orth, and Peter Russo. 2000. The embroidered musical ball: a squeezable instrument for expressive performance. In CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '00), 283--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Danielle Wilde. 2008. The hipdiskettes: learning (through) wearables. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat (OZCHI '08), 259--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Cara Wilson, Margot Brereton, Bernd Ploderer, Laurianne Sitbon, and Beth Saggers. 2017. Digital Strategies for Supporting Strengths- and Interests-based Learning with Children with Autism. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 52--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Cara Wilson, Margot Brereton, Bernd Ploderer, and Laurianne Sitbon. 2018. MyWord: Enhancing Engagement, Interaction and Self- expression with Minimally-verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum Through a Personal Audio-visual Dictionary. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '18), 106--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Cara Wilson, Margot Brereton, Bernd Ploderer, and Laurianne Sitbon. 2019. Co-Design Beyond Words: 'Moments of Interaction' with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019), Paper 21, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Yulia Zhiglova. 2018. The Interactive Carpet - Smart Textile Interface for Children on Autism Spectrum Disorder. In Proc. of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '18), 712--714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Self-Expression by Design: Co-Designing the ExpressiBall with Minimally-Verbal Children on the Autism Spectrum

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      10688 pages
      ISBN:9781450367080
      DOI:10.1145/3313831

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format