Paul Dourish
John Lamping
Tom Rodden
ABSTRACT
Research into collaborative document use often concentrates on how people share document content. However, studies of real-world document practices reveal that the structures by which document corpora are organised may also, themselves, be important sites of collaborative activity. Unfortunately, this poses a problem. When category structures are used to understand a set of documents, the manipulation of those structures can interfere with shared understanding and intelligibility of the document space.
We show how this problem arises in real-world settings, using a case arising from some recent field work. We outline a solution to the customisation/intelligibility problem, and show how it has been implemented in a system for personal and workgroup document management.
- 1.Bannon, L. and Bodker, S. (1997). Constructing Common Information Spaces. Proc. European Conf. Computer- Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'97 (Lancaster, UK). Dordrecht: Kluwer.]] Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Bentley, R. and Dourish, P. (1995). Medium versus Mechanism: Supporting Collaboration through Customisation. Proc. European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'95 (Stockholm, Sweden). Dordrecht: Kluwer.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Blomberg, J., Suchman, L., and Trigg, R. (1997). Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project. In Bowker, Star, Turner and Gasser (eds), Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, 189-215. Mahwah, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum.]]Google Scholar
- 4.Bowker, G. and Star, S. (1994). Knowledge and Infrastructure in International Information Management: Problems of classification and coding. In Bud (ed), Information Acumen: The understanding and use of knowledge in modern business. London: Routledge.]]Google Scholar
- 5.Dewan, P. and Choudhary, R. (1995). Coupling the User Interfaces of a Multiuser Program. ACM Trans. Computer- Human interaction, 2(1), 1-39.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Dourish, P., Bellotti, V., Mackay, W., and Ma, C.-Y. (1993). Information and Context: Lessons from a Study of Two Shared information Systems. Proc. ACM Conf. Organisational Computing Systems C00CS'93 (Milpetas, California). New York: ACM.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Dourish, P., Edwards, K., LaMarca, A. and Salisbury, M. (1999). Presto: An Experimental Architecture for Fluid interactive Document Spaces. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 6(2).]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.]]Google Scholar
- 9.Gerson, E. and Star, S. L. (1986). Analyzing Due Process in the Workplace. ACM Trans. Office Information Systems, 4(3), 257- 270.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Greenberg, S. (1991). Personalizable Groupware: Accommodating Individual Roles and Group Differences. Proc. European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'91. Dordrecht: Kluwer.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. (1998). Design for Individuals, Design for Groups; Tradeoffs Between Power and Workspace Awareness. Proc. A CM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'98 (Seattle, WA). New York: ACM.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Lu, I. and Mantei, M. (1991). Idea Management in a Shared Drawing Toot. Proc. European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'91. Dordrecht: Kluwer]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Mackay, W. (1990). Users and Customizable Software: A Co- Adaptive Phenomenon. PhD dissertation. Sloan School of Management. Cambridge, Mass: MIT.]]Google Scholar
- 14.Mackay, W. (1991). Triggers and Barriers to Customizing Software. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'91 (New Orleans, LA). New York: ACM.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lovstrand, L. and Moran, T. (1990). User-Tailorable Systems: Pressing the Issues with Buttons. Proc. A CM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'90 (Seattle, WA). New York: ACM.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Simone, C., Mark, G. and Giubbilei, D. (1999). Interoperation as a Means of Articulation Work. Proc. Intl Joint Conf. Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration WACC'99 (San Francisco, CA). New York: ACM.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Tatar, D., Foster, G. and Bobrow, D. (1991). Designing for Conversation: Lessons from Cognoter. Intl. Journal of Man- Machine Studies, 34(2), 185-209.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.Trigg, R. and Bodker, S. (1994). From Implementation to Design: Tailoring and the Emergence of Systematization in CSCW. Proc. ACM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'94 (Chapel Hill, NC). New York: ACM.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Trigg, R., B lomberg, J. and Suchman, L. (1999). Moving Document Collections Online: The Evolution of a Shared Repository. Proc. European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'99 (Copenhagen, Denmark). Dordrecht: Kluwer.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: CUP.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Suchman, L. (to appear). Embodied Practices of Engineering Work. To appear in Mind, Culture and Activity.]]Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Building bridges: customisation and mutual intelligibility in shared category management
Recommendations
DocuBrowse: faceted searching, browsing, and recommendations in an enterprise context
IUI '10: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfacesBrowsing and searching for documents in large, online enterprise document repositories are common activities. While internet search produces satisfying results for most user queries, enterprise search has not been as successful because of differences in ...
Presto: an experimental architecture for fluid interactive document spaces
Traditional document systems use hierarchical filing structures as the basis for organizing, storing and retrieving documents. However, this structure is very limited in comparison with the rich and varied forms of document interaction and category ...
Indexing for fast categorisation
ACSC '03: Proceedings of the 26th Australasian computer science conference - Volume 16Automatic categorisation is an important technique for the management of large document collections. Categorisation can be used to store or locate documents that satisfy an information need when the need cannot be expressed as a concise list of query ...
Comments