Eva Sharma
Koustuv Saha
ABSTRACT
Social media provides a unique platform enabling public discourse around cross-cutting ideologies. In this paper, we provide a methodological lens for studying the discourses around the controversial topic of abortion on social media. Drawing from the theoretical framework of "Critical Discourse Analysis", we study discourse around abortion on Twitter through analysis of language and the manifested socio-cultural practices. First, employing a large dataset of over 700 thousand posts, we find that abortion discourse can be classified into three ideologies: For, Against, and Neutral to Abortion. We observe these ideological categories to be characterized by distinctive textual and psycholinguistic cues. Finally, we analyze the nature of discourse across ideologies against the backdrop of socio-cultural practices associated with abortion. Our findings reveal how the hegemonic nature of the rhetoric that has historically shaped the abortion debate in society is reconceptualized on Twitter. We discuss the role of social media as a public sphere that shapes critical discourse around controversial topics.
- Aseel A Addawood and Masooda N Bashir. 2016. âĂIJ What is Your Evidence?âĂİ A Study of Controversial Topics on Social Media. ACL 2016 (2016), 1.Google Scholar
- Pablo Barberá. 2015. Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis 23, 1 (2015), 76--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adrian Benton, Braden Hancock, Glen Coppersmith, John W Ayers, and Mark Dredze. 2016. After Sandy Hook Elementary: A year in the gun control debate on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02060 (2016).Google Scholar
- David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. JMLR 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. 2000. Critical discourse analysis. Annual review of Anthropology (2000), 447--466.Google Scholar
- Axel Bruns and Jean E Burgess. 2011. The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of ECPR.Google Scholar
- Jean K Chalaby. 1998. Beyond the prison-house of language: Discourse as a sociological concept. In The Invention of Journalism. Springer, 57--67.Google Scholar
- Lilie Chouliaraki and Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Michael Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew R Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. Political polarization on twitter. ICWSM 133 (2011), 89--96.Google Scholar
- Flora Davis. 1999. Moving the mountain: The women's movement in America since 1960. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Munmun De Choudhury, Shagun Jhaver, Benjamin Sugar, and Ingmar Weber. 2016. Social Media Participation in an Activist Movement for Racial Equality. In ICWSM.Google Scholar
- Michele Dillon. 1993. Argumentative complexity of abortion discourse. Public Opinion Quarterly 57, 3 (1993), 305--314.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacob Eisenstein, Amr Ahmed, and Eric P Xing. 2011. Sparse additive generative models of text. ICML (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Norman Fairclough. 1992. Discourse and social change. Polity press.Google Scholar
- Norman Fairclough. 1997. Discourse across disciplines: discourse analysis in researching social change. AILA Review 12, 1 (1997), 3--17.Google Scholar
- Norman Fairclough, Jane Mulderrig, and Ruth Wodak. 2011. Critical discourse analysis. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2011), 357--378.Google Scholar
- Myra Marx Ferree. 2002. Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Michel Foucault. 1971. Orders of discourse. Social science information 10, 2 (1971), 7--30.Google Scholar
- Gallup. 2016. Gallup Report on Abortion. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx. (2016). Accessed: 2017-01-02.Google Scholar
- Barney G Glaser and Anselm L Strauss. 2009. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction publishers.Google Scholar
- Antonio Gramsci, Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, and Quintin Hoare. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci: Ed. and Transl. by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. International Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kate Greasley. 2017. Arguments about Abortion: Personhood, Morality, and Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Jürgen Habermas. 1991. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press.Google Scholar
- Glen A Halva-Neubauer and Sara L Zeigler. 2010. Promoting fetal personhood: The rhetorical and legislative strategies of the pro-life movement after planned parenthood v. casey. Feminist Formations 22, 2 (2010), 101--123.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gerard A Hauser. 1999. Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Univ of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Maxine Lattimer. 1998. Dominant ideas versus womenâĂŹs reality: Hegemonic discourse in British abortion law. In Abortion Law and Politics Today. Springer, 59--75.Google Scholar
- Rolf Lidskog and Ulrika Olausson. 2013. To spray or not to spray: The discursive construction of contested environmental issues in the news media. Discourse, Context & Media 2, 3 (2013), 123--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas R Lindlof and Bryan C Taylor. 2010. Qualitative communication research methods. Sage.Google Scholar
- Zhe Liu and Ingmar Weber. 2014. Is Twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? A cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look. In International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer, 336--347.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gilad Lotan, Erhardt Graeff, Mike Ananny, Devin Gaffney, Ian Pearce, et al. 2011. The Arab Spring| the revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. IJOC 5 (2011), 31.Google Scholar
- Kristin Luker. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Vol. 3. Duke Univ Press.Google Scholar
- Dawn McCaffrey et al. 2000. Competitive framing processes in the abortion debate: Polarization-vilification, frame saving, and frame debunking. The Sociological Quarterly 41, 1 (2000), 41--61.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mor Naaman, Jeffrey Boase, and Chih-Hui Lai. 2010. Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of CSCW. ACM, 189--192. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann. 1974. The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of communication 24, 2 (1974), 43--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James W Pennebaker, Matthias R Mehl, and Kate G Niederhoffer. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual review of psychology 54, 1 (2003), 547--577.Google Scholar
- Pew. 2016. 5 Facts about Abortion. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/27/5-facts-about-abortion/. (2016). Accessed: 2017-01-02.Google Scholar
- Politico. 2016. Supreme Court strikes restrictive Texas abortion law. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/supreme-court-strikes-restrictive-texas-abortion-law-224831. (2016). Accessed: 2017-06-12.Google Scholar
- Politico. 2016. Women in black protest PolandâĂŹs new abortion proposal. http://www.politico.eu/article/women-in-black-protest-polands-new-abortion-proposal/. (2016). Accessed: 2017-06-12.Google Scholar
- Politico. 2017. What's actually in the GOP health care bill. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/04/gop-health-care-bill-details-explained-237987. (2017). Accessed: 2017-06-12.Google Scholar
- Christopher Pullen and Margaret Cooper. 2010. LGBT identity and online new media. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Adrienne Rich. 1995. Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Steven M Schneider. 1996. Creating a democratic public sphere through political discussion: A case study of abortion conversation on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review 14, 4 (1996), 373--393.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandra Segerberg and W Lance Bennett. 2011. Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review 14, 3 (2011), 197--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clay Shirky. 2011. The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign affairs (2011), 28--41.Google Scholar
- Laura M Smith, Linhong Zhu, Kristina Lerman, and Zornitsa Kozareva. 2013. The role of social media in the discussion of controversial topics. In SocialCom. IEEE, 236--243. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yla R Tausczik and James W Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology 29, 1 (2010), 24--54.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anton Törnberg and Petter Törnberg. 2016. Muslims in social media discourse: Combining topic modeling and critical discourse analysis. Discourse, Context & Media (2016).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ralph Turner. 1996. The moral issue in collective behavior and collective action. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 1, 1 (1996), 1--15.Google Scholar
- Teun A Van Dijk. 2006. Politics, ideology, and discourse. In Encyclopaedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition). Elsevier Ltd, 728--740.Google Scholar
- Sarita Yardi and danah boyd. 2010. Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30, 5 (2010), 316--327.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amy X Zhang and Scott Counts. 2015. Modeling ideology and predicting policy change with social media: Case of same-sex marriage. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 2603--2612. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amy X Zhang and Scott Counts. 2016. Gender and Ideology in the Spread of Anti-Abortion Policy. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 3378--3389. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Analyzing Ideological Discourse on Social Media: A Case Study of the Abortion Debate
Recommendations
The Role of Social Media in Participatory Democracy: A Case Study of Facebook Groups
GROUP '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkThis dissertation investigates three Facebook groups as case studies of the role of social media in enhancing participatory democracy. I argue that the groups were formed to provide avenues for articulating discourses that are counter to the dominant ...
Are social media emancipatory or hegemonic? societal effects of mass media digitization in the case of the SOPA discourse
Mass media digitization is an unfolding phenomenon, posing novel societal opportunities and challenges that researchers are beginning to note. We build on and extend MIS research on process digitization and digital versus traditional communication media ...
Corporate Social Responsibility in Social Media Environment
Information and Communication TechnologyAbstractThe paper describes corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication on Facebook and Twitter – how the companies use the social media for accomplishing their CSR communication goals. On the sample of ten global companies with the best CSR ...
Comments