ABSTRACT
Unfamiliar, large-scale virtual environments are difficult to navigate. This paper presents design guidelines to ease navigation in such virtual environments. The guidelines presented here focus on the design and placement of landmarks in virtual environments. Moreover, the guidelines are based primarily on the extensive empirical literature on navigation in the real world. A rationale for this approach is provided by the similarities between navigational behavior in real and virtual environments.
- 1.Billinghurst, M. & Weghorst, S. The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments, in Proceedings of IEEE 1995 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposh~m, IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos, CA, 1995, 40-47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2.Brooks, F. P. Jr. Grasping reality through itllusionm Interactive graphics serving science, in Proceedings of CHI '88 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 1988, 1-11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Chase, W. G. Visual information proc, essing, in Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol II: Cognitive processes and performance, K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J.P. Thomas (Eds.), John Wiley and Sons, 1986, pp. 28-1 to 28-71.Google Scholar
- 4.Couclelis, H., Golledge, R. G., Gale, N. D., & Tobler, W. R. Exploring the anchor point hypothesis of spatial cognition, Journal of Environmental Psyc,~ology, 7, 1987, 99-122.Google Scholar
- 5.Darken, R. P. & Banker, W. P. Navigating: in natural environments: A virtual environment training transfer study, in Proceedings of IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos, CA, 1998, 12-19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Darken, R. P. & Sibert, J. L. A toolset for navigation in virtual environments, in Proceedings of UIST ' 9 3 (Atlanta GA, Nov. 1993), ACM Press, 158-165. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Darken, R. P. & Sibert, J. L. Navigating large virtual spaces. International Journal of Human-,Computer Interaction, 8, 1, 1996, 49-71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Evans, G. W. Environmental cognition, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1980, 259-287.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 9.Evans, G. W., Marrero, D. G., Buffer, P. A., Environmental learning and cognitive mapping, Environment and Behavior, 13, 1981, 83-104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10.Evans, G. W., Skorpanich, M. A., Garling, T.,. Bryant, K. J., & Bresolin, B., The effects of pathway configuration, landmarks, and stress on environmental cognition, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 1984, 323-335.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 11.Evans, G. W., Smith, C. & Pezdek, K., Cogni~;ive maps and urban form, Journal of the American Plar,;ning Associations, 48, 1982, 232-244.Google Scholar
- 12.G~ling, T., BOOk, A, & Lindberg, E., Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments: The interrelationship of action plans, acquisition, and orientation, Environment and Behavior, 16, 1984, 3- 34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13.G~ling, T., Lindberg, E., Carreiras, M. & Btt~k, A. Reference systems in cognitive maps, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 1986, 1-18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14.Golledge, R. G, Smith, T. R., Pellegrino, J. W., Doherty, S., & Marshall, S. P. A conceptual model and empirical analysis of children's acquisition of spatial knowledge, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 1985, 125-152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 15.Golledge, R. G. & Stimson, R. J. Spatial Behavior. The Guilford Press: New York, NY, 1997.Google Scholar
- 16.Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J., Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps, Memory & Cognition, 13, 1985, 208- 217.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.Kuipers, B., Modeling spatial knowledge, Cognitive Science, 2, 1978, 129-153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18.Lawton, C. A. Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety, Sex Roles, 30, 11/12, 1994, 765-779.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 19.Lynch, K. The Image of the City. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1960.Google Scholar
- 20.Moar, I., & Bower, G. H., Inconsistency in spatial knowledge, Memory & Cognition, 11, 1983, 107-113.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 21.Montello, D. R. A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large-scale environments, in Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems, M. J. Eganhofer & R. Golledge (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 1998, 143-154.Google Scholar
- 22.Moore, G. T., Developmental differences in environmental cognition, in Environmental Design Research, W Preisser (Ed.), Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross: Stroudsburg, PA, 1973.Google Scholar
- 23.Passini, R., Way-finding in complex buildings: An environmental analysis, Man-Environment Systems, 10, 1980-31-40.Google Scholar
- 24.Pausch, R., Burnette, T., Brockway, D., & Weiblen, M. E. Navigation and locomotion in virtual worlds via flight into hand-held miniatures, in Proceedings of A CM Siggraph '95, Computer Graphics, July 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.Rovine, M. J., & Weisman, G. D., Sketch-map variables as predictors of way-finding performance, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 1989, 217- 232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 26.Ruddle, R. P., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. Navigating buildings in "desk-top" virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 2, 1997, 143-159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 27.Song, D. & Norman, M. Nonlinear interactive motion control techniques for virtual space navigation, in Proceedings of IEEE 1993 Virtual Reality Annual international Symposium, IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos, CA, 1993, 111-117.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.Stevens, A., & Coupe, P., Distortions in judged spatial relations, Cognitive psychology, 10, 1978, 422-437.Google Scholar
- 29.Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation, Cognitive Psychology, 14, I982, 560-589.Google Scholar
- 30.Tversky, B., Distortions in memory for maps, Cognitive Psychology, 13, 1981, 407-433.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 31.Tversky, B., Franklin, N., Taylor, H. A., Bryant, D. j. Spatial mental models from descriptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 9, 1994, 656-669. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 32.Ware, C. & Slipp, L. Using velocity control to navigate 3D graphical environments: A comparison of three interfaces, in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, (San Francisco, CA, Sept. 1991), Human Factors Society: Santa Monica, CA, 300-304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 33.Whitaker, L. A. Getting around in the natural world. Ergonomics in Design, 4, 3, 1996, 11-15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 34.Whitaker, L. A., & Cuqlock-Knopp, G. Navigation in off-road environments: Orienteering interviews. Scientific Journal of Orienteering, 8, 1992, 55-71.Google Scholar
- 35.Wickens, C. D. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 2nd ed. Harper Collins Publishers Inc.: New York, 1992.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments
Recommendations
Navigation in desktop virtual environments: an evaluation and recommendations for supporting usability
Virtual reality (VR) can provide useful tools for a variety of applications. However, for these tools to be effective, they must be easy to use. In virtual environments (VEs), usability is impaired by poorly designed navigation systems. Insufficient ...
Usability engineering of virtual environments (VEs): identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design
Designing usable and effective interactive virtual environment (VE) systems is a new challenge for system developers and human factors specialists. In particular, traditional usability principles do not consider characteristics unique to VE systems, ...
Navigation in desktop virtual environments: an evaluation and recommendations for supporting usability
Virtual reality (VR) can provide useful tools for a variety of applications. However, for these tools to be effective, they must be easy to use. In virtual environments (VEs), usability is impaired by poorly designed navigation systems. Insufficient ...
Comments