skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025602acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

"These are not my hands!": Effect of Gender on the Perception of Avatar Hands in Virtual Reality

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Rendering the user's body in virtual reality increases immersion and presence the illusion of "being there". Recent technology enables determining the pose and position of the hands to render them accordingly while interacting within the virtual environment. Virtual reality applications often use realistic male or female hands, mimic robotic hands, or cartoon hands. However, it is unclear how users perceive different hand styles. We conducted a study with 14 male and 14 female participants in virtual reality to investigate the effect of gender on the perception of six different hands. Quantitative and qualitative results show that women perceive lower levels of presence while using male avatar hands and male perceive lower levels of presence using non-human avatar hands. While women dislike male hands, men accept and feel presence with avatar hands of both genders. Our results highlight the importance of considering the users' diversity when designing virtual reality experiences.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1725.mp4

mp4

18.4 MB

References

  1. Ferran Argelaguet, Ludovic Hoyet, Michaël Trico, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2016. The role of interaction in virtual embodiment: Effects of the virtual hand representation. Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2016-July (2016), 3--10. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504682 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Mahdi Azmandian, Mark Hancock, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2016. Haptic Retargeting: Dynamic Repurposing of Passive Haptics for Enhanced Virtual Reality Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858226 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Frank Biocca and Mark R. Levy. 2013. Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA. 416 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Anna Felnhofer, Oswald D Kothgassner, Nathalie Hauk, Leon Beutl, Helmut Hlavacs, and Ilse Kryspin-Exner. 2013. Physical and social presence in collaborative virtual environments: Exploring age and gender differences with respect to empathy. Computers in Human Behavior 31 (2013), 272--279. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.045 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gary Fontaine. 1992. The Experience of a Sense of Presence in Intercultural and International Encounters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1, 4 (1992), 482--490. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.4.482 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Julian Frommel, Michael Weber, Katja Rogers, Julia Brich, Daniel Besserer, Leonard Bradatsch, Isabel Ortinau, Ramona Schabenberger, Valentin Riemer, and Claudia Schrader. 2015. Integrated Questionnaires: Maintaining Presence in Game Environments for Self-Reported Data Acquisition. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15). ACM Press, 359--368. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793130 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jari Kätsyri, Meeri Mäkäräinen, and Tapio Takala. 2016. Testing the â "A uncanny valley" hypothesis in semirealistic computer-animated film characters: An empirical evaluation of natural film stimuli. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (sep 2016). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lorraine Lin and Sophie Jörg. 2016. Need a Hand?: How Appearance Affects the Virtual Hand Illusion. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 69--76. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2931002.2931006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Matthew Lombard and Theresa Ditton. 1997. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, 2 (1997). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083--6101.1997.tb00072.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jean-Luc Lugrin, Johanna Latt, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2015. Anthropomorphism and Illusion of Virtual Body Ownership. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence and 20th Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments (ICAT - EGVE '15). Eurographics Association, 1--8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/egve.20151303Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Karl F. MacDorman, Robert D. Green, Chin Chang Ho, and Clinton T. Koch. 2009. Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 3 (may 2009), 695--710. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Masahiro Mori, Karl F MacDorman, and Norri Kageki. 1970/2012. The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE 19, 2 (1970/2012), 98--100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Tabitha C. Peck, Sofia Seinfeld, Salvatore M. Aglioti, and Mel Slater. 2013. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition 22, 3 (sep 2013), 779--787. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mamy Pouliquen, Alain Bernard, Jacques Marsot, and Laurent Chodorge. 2007. Virtual hands and virtual reality multimodal platform to design safer industrial systems. Computers in Industry 58, 1 (2007), 46--56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.04.001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Patrice Renaud, Joanne L Rouleau, Luc Granger, Ian Barsetti, and Stéphane Bouchard. 2002. Measuring sexual preferences in virtual reality: A pilot study. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5, 1 (2002), 1--9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109493102753685836 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mareike Schmidt, Johanna Xenia Kafka, Oswald D. Kothgassner, Helmut Hlavacs, Leon Beutl, and Anna Felnhofer. 2013. Why Does It Always Rain on Me? Influence of Gender and Environmental Factors on Usability, Technology Related Anxiety and Immersion in Virtual Environments. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 392--402. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319-03161--3_29Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas Schubert, Frank Friedmann, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2001. The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10, 3 (2001), 266--281. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Valentin Schwind, Katrin Wolf, Niels Henze, and Oliver Korn. 2015. Determining the Characteristics of Preferred Virtual Faces Using an Avatar Generator. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15). ACM Press, 221--230. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793116 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kay M. Stanney, Kelly S. Kingdon, David Graeber, and Robert S. Kennedy. 2002. Human Performance in Immersive Virtual Environments: Effects of Exposure Duration, User Control, and Scene Complexity. Human Performance 15, 4 (2002), 339--366. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_03 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Andrea Brogni, Marco Gillies, Mel Slater, and Anthony Steed. 2004. An investigation of presence response across variations in visual realism. In The 7th Annual International Presence Workshop. 148--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Bob G. Witmer and Michael J. Singer. 1998. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 3 (1998), 225--240. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only Anova Procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM Press, 143--146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Christine Youngblut and Odette Huie. 2003. The relationship between presence and performance in virtual environments: results of a VERTS study. In IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings., Vol. 2003-Janua. IEEE Comput. Soc, 277--278. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VR.2003.1191158 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "These are not my hands!": Effect of Gender on the Perception of Avatar Hands in Virtual Reality

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2017
        7138 pages
        ISBN:9781450346559
        DOI:10.1145/3025453

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader