skip to main content
10.1145/2993901.2993902acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cognitive Stages in Visual Data Exploration

Published:24 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data exploration requires forming analysis goals, planning actions and evaluating results effectively, all of which are complex cognitive activities. Therefore, the data exploration and analysis process can be improved through a principled and comprehensive approach to analyzing the cognitive activities of the user given a data exploration tool. However, many taxonomies and evaluations focus on a specific tool or specific design guides instead of cognitive activities comprehensively. In this paper, we first present the Cognitive Exploration Framework that identifies six stages of cognitive activities in visual data exploration. These stages are a combination of two activities---planning and assessing---across data analysis, interaction, and visualization. Cognitive barriers in each stage can lower the success and speed of data exploration. The framework also identifies the factors of decision-making, existing knowledge and motivation that influence cognitive activities. We argue that cognitive stages can be supported by improving the design of tools rather than their computing capabilities. We demonstrate how the framework clarifies the structured relationship between design guides to specific cognitive stages. In particular, the framework can also be used to guide evaluation of data exploration tools. To reveal cognitive barriers in each stage, we focused on the failures instead of success stories, and on motivating self-driven open-ended exploration instead of using benchmarked tasks on fixed datasets. With these goals, we studied short-term casual use of an exploratory tool by novices with limited training. Our results reveal cognitive barriers across all stages. We also discuss directions for future research and applications.

References

  1. R. A. Amar and J. T. Stasko, "Knowledge precepts for design and evaluation of information visualizations," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 432--442, Jul. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E. W. Anderson, K. C. Potter, L. E. Matzen, J. F. Shepherd, G. A. Preston, and C. T. Silva, "A User Study of Visualization Effectiveness Using EEG and Cognitive Load," Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 791--800, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Arias-Hernandez, L. T. Kaastra, T. M. Green, and B. Fisher, "Pair Analytics: Capturing Reasoning Processes in Collaborative Visual Analytics," in 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2011, pp. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. B. Bederson, "Interfaces for Staying in the Flow," Ubiquity, no. September, pp. 1--1, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Bigelow, S. Drucker, D. Fisher, and M. Meyer, "Reflections on How Designers Design with Data," in Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Boy, L. Eveillard, F. Detienne, and J. Fekete, "Suggested Interactivity: Seeking Perceived Affordances for Information Visualization," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 639--648, Jan. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Brehmer and T. Munzner, "A Multi-Level Typology of Abstract Visualization Tasks," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2376--2385, Dec. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman, "Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think," San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1999, pp. 579--581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E. H.-H. Chi and J. T. Riedl, "An operator interaction framework for visualization systems," in IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 1998, pp. 63--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill, "Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 79, no. 387, pp. 531--554, Sep. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. W. Dou, C. Ziemkiewicz, L. Harrison, D. H. Jeong, W. Ribarsky, X. Wang, and R. Chang, "Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Relationship Between Interaction Constraints and Visual Isomorphs," Information Visualization, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 222--236, Jul. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Elmqvist, A. V. Moere, H.-C. Jetter, D. Cernea, H. Reiterer, and T. J. Jankun-Kelly, "Fluid Interaction for Information Visualization," Information Visualization, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 327--340, Oct. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon, "Verbal reports as data.," Psychological review, vol. 87, no. 3, p. 215, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. J. Gerrig, P. G. Zimbardo, A. J. Campbell, S. R. Cum-ming, and F. J. Wilkes, Psychology and life. Pearson Higher Education AU, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Golemati, C. Halatsis, C. Vassilakis, A. Katifori, and G. Lepouras, "A Context-Based Adaptive Visualization Environment," in Tenth International Conference on Information Visualization, 2006, pp. 62--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Grammel, M. Tory, and M.-A. Storey, "How Information Visualization Novices Construct Visualizations," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 943--952, Nov. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. M. Green, W. Ribarsky, and B. Fisher, "Visual analytics for complex concepts using a human cognition model," in IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2008, pp. 91--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. S. Greene, E. Tanin, C. Plaisant, B. Shneiderman, L. Olsen, G. Major, and S. Johns, "The end of zero-hit queries: query previews for NASA's Global Change Master Directory," International Journal on Digital Libraries, vol. 2, no. 2-3, pp. 79--90, Sep. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. H. Guo, S. Gomez, C. Ziemkiewicz, and D. Laidlaw, "A Case Study Using Visualization Interaction Logs and Insight," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1--1, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. L. Harrison, D. Skau, S. Franconeri, A. Lu, and R. Chang, "Influencing Visual Judgment Through Affective Priming," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2013, pp. 2949--2958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Heer and M. Agrawala, "Software Design Patterns for Information Visualization," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 853--860, Sep. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Heer, F. van Ham, S. Carpendale, C. Weaver, and P. Isenberg, "Creation and Collaboration: Engaging New Audiences for Information Visualization," in Information Visualization, A. Kerren, J. T. Stasko, J.-D. Fekete, and C. North, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 92--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Heer, J. Mackinlay, C. Stolte, and M. Agrawala, "Graphical Histories for Visualization: Supporting Analysis, Communication, and Evaluation," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1189--1196, Nov. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Heer and G. Robertson, "Animated Transitions in Statistical Data Graphics," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1240--1247, Nov. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, Reprint edition. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Kandel, A. Paepcke, J. M. Hellerstein, and J. Heer, "Enterprise Data Analysis and Visualization: An Interview Study," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2917--2926, Dec. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D. Kirsh, "Interaction, External Representation and Sense Making," Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1103--1108, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. G. Klein, B. Moon, and R. R. Hoffman, "Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 88--92, Sep. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. Kobsa, "An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems," in IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001, pp. 123--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. B. chul Kwon, B. Fisher, and J. S. Yi, "Visual analytic roadblocks for novice investigators," in IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011, pp. 3--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. H. Lam, "A Framework of Interaction Costs in Information Visualization," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1149--1156, Nov. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. S. Lee, S.-H. Kim, Y.-H. Hung, H. Lam, Y. Kang, and J. S. Yi, "How do People Make Sense of Unfamiliar Visualizations?: A Grounded Model of Novice's Information Visualization Sensemaking," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1--1, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Z. Liu and J. Heer, "The Effects of Interactive Latency on Exploratory Visual Analysis," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2122--2131, Dec. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Z. Liu, N. Nersessian, and J. Stasko, "Distributed Cognition as a Theoretical Framework for Information Visualization," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1173--1180, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Z. Liu and J. T. Stasko, "Mental Models, Visual Reasoning and Interaction in Information Visualization: A Top-down Perspective," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 999--1008, Nov. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. Mackinlay, P. Hanrahan, and C. Stolte, "Show Me: Automatic Presentation for Visual Analysis," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1137--1144, Nov. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. J. Maeda, The Laws of Simplicity. MIT Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. T. Munzner, "A Nested Model for Visualization Design and Validation," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 921--928, Nov. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. D. A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things. Basic books, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. H. L. O'Brien and E. G. Toms, "The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 50--69, Jan. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. A. Perer and B. Shneiderman, "Systematic Yet Flexible Discovery: Guiding Domain Experts Through Exploratory Data Analysis," in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. P. Pirolli and S. Card, "Information foraging," Psychological Review, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 643--675, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. N. H. Riche, B. Lee, and C. Plaisant, "Understanding Interactive Legends: a Comparative Evaluation with Standard Widgets," Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1193--1202, Jun. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. J. C. Roberts, "State of the Art: Coordinated Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization," in Fifth International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization, 2007. CMV '07, 2007, pp. 61--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. S. F. Roth, J. Kolojejchick, J. Mattis, and J. Goldstein, "Interactive Graphic Design Using Automatic Presentation Knowledge," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 1994, pp. 112--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. P. Saraiya, C. North, and K. Duca, "An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 443--456, Jul. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. B. Schwartz and K. Kliban, The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Ecco New York, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. V. Setlur and M. C. Stone, "A Linguistic Approach to Categorical Color Assignment for Data Visualization," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 698--707, Jan. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. B. Shneiderman, "Dynamic queries for visual information seeking," IEEE Software, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 70--77, Nov. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. B. Shneiderman, "The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations," in IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, 1996, pp. 336--343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. B. Shneiderman, "Direct Manipulation for Comprehensible, Predictable and Controllable User Interfaces," in Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, New York, NY, USA, 1997, pp. 33--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Y. B. Shrinivasan and J. J. van Wijk, "Supporting the Analytical Reasoning Process in Information Visualization," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 1237--1246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. B. Steichen, C. Conati, and G. Carenini, "Inferring Visualization Task Properties, User Performance, and User Cognitive Abilities from Eye Gaze Data," ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 11:1--11:29, Jul. 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. C. Stolte and P. Hanrahan, "Polaris: A System for Query, Analysis and Visualization of Multi-Dimensional Relational Databases," in IEEE Symposium on Information Vizualiza-tion, Washington, DC, USA, 2000, p. 5--. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook, Eds., Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. Los Alamitos, CA: National Visualization and Analytics Ctr, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. E. Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd edition. Cheshire, Conn: Graphics Pr, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. J. Walny, S. Huron, and S. Carpendale, "An Exploratory Study of Data Sketching for Visual Representation," Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 231--240, Jun. 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. J. J. van Wijk, "The value of visualization," in IEEE Visualization, 2005, pp. 79--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. W. Willett, J. Heer, and M. Agrawala, "Scented Widgets: Improving Navigation Cues with Embedded Visualizations," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1129--1136, Nov. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. "The Design Ethos of Dieter Rams," San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. {Online}. Available: http://www.sfmoma.org/about/press/press_exhibitions/releases/880. {Accessed: 10-Feb-2015}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BELIV '16: Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors on Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization
    October 2016
    177 pages
    ISBN:9781450348188
    DOI:10.1145/2993901

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 24 October 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate45of64submissions,70%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader