Eike Langbehn
Frank Steinicke
ABSTRACT
It is known for decades that users tend to significantly underestimate or overestimate distances or speed in immersive virtual environments (IVEs) compared to corresponding judgments in the real world. Although several factors have been identified in the past that could explain small portions of this effect, the main causes of these perceptual discrepancies still remain elusive. One of the factors that has received less attention in the literature is the amount of blur presented in the visual imagery, for example, when using a head-mounted display (HMD).
In this paper, we analyze the impact of the visual blur effects depth-of-field and motion blur in terms of their effects on distance and speed estimation in IVEs. We conducted three psychophysical experiments in which we compared distance or speed estimation between the real world and IVEs with different levels of depth-of-field or motion blur. Our results indicate that the amount of blur added to the visual stimuli had no noticeable influence on distance and speed estimation even when high magnitudes of blur were shown. Our findings suggest that the human perceptual system is highly capable of extracting depth and motion information regardless of blur, and implies that blur can likely be ruled out as the main cause of these misperception effects in IVEs.
- Ahmed, F., Cohen, J. D., Binder, K. S., and Fennema, C. L. 2010. Influence of tactile feedback and presence on egocentric distance perception in virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), IEEE, 195--202. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Banton, T., Stefanucci, J., Durgin, F., Fass, A., and Proffitt, D. 2005. The perception of walking speed in a virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14, 4, 394--406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruder, G., Sanz, F. A., Olivier, A.-H., and Lécuyer, A. 2015. Distance estimation in large immersive projection systems, revisited. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), IEEE, 27--32.Google Scholar
- Burr, D. C., and Ross, J. 2002. Direct evidence that speedlines influence motion mechanisms. The Journal of Neuroscience 22, 19, 8661--8664.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carnegie, K., and Rhee, T. 2015. Reducing visual discomfort with HMDs using dynamic depth of field. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 35, 5, 34--41.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Creem-Regehr, S. H., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., and Thompson, W. B. 2005. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: Implications for real and virtual indoor environments. Perception 34, 2, 191--204.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Creem-Regehr, S. H., Stefanucci, J. K., Thompson, W. B., Nash, N., and McCardell, M. 2015. Egocentric distance perception in the oculus rift (dk2). In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP), 47--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ernst, M. 2006. Human Body Perception From The Inside Out. Oxford University Press, ch. A Bayesian View on Multimodal Cue Integration, 105--131.Google Scholar
- Francis, G., and Kim, H. 2001. Perceived motion in orientational afterimages: direction and speed. Vision research 41, 2, 161--172.Google Scholar
- Held, R. T., Cooper, E. A., Obrien, J. F., and Banks, M. S. 2010. Using blur to affect perceived distance and size. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 2. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hillaire, S., Lécuyer, A., Cozot, R., and Casiez, G. 2007. Depth-of-field blur effects for first-person navigation in virtual environments. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), ACM, 203--206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hoffman, D. M., Girshick, A. R., Akeley, K., and Banks, M. S. 2008. Vergence---accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of vision 8, 3, 33--33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Howard, I., and Rogers, B. 2002. Seeing in Depth: Depth Perception, Vol. 1. Porteous Publishing, Toronto.Google Scholar
- Interrante, V., Ries, B., Lindquist, J., and Anderson, L. 2007. Elucidating the Factors that can Facilitate Veridical Spatial Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments. In IEEE Proceedings of the Virtual Reality (VR), IEEE, 11--18.Google Scholar
- Jones, J., Swan II, J. E., and Bolas, M. 2013. Peripheral stimulation and its effect on perceived spatial scale in virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 19, 4, 701--710. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, H., and Francis, G. 1998. A computational and perceptual account of motion lines. Perception 27, 7, 785--797.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lanman, D., and Luebke, D. 2013. Near-eye light field displays. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 32, 6, 220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Legge, G. E., Gage, R., Baek, Y., and Bochsler, T. M. 2016. Indoor spatial updating with reduced visual information. PloS one 11, 3, e0150708.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, B., Zhang, R., Nordman, A., and Kuhl, S. A. 2015. The effects of minification and display field of view on distance judgments in real and hmd-based environments. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP), 55--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Loomis, J., and Knapp, J. 2003. Visual Perception of Egocentric Distance in Real and Virtual Environments. In Virtual and Adaptive Environments, L. Hettinger and M. Haas, Eds. Erlbaum, 21--46.Google Scholar
- Moehring, M., Gloystein, A., and Doerner, R. 2009. Issues with virtual space perception within reaching distance: Mitigating adverse effects on applications using HMDs in the automotive industry. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), IEEE, 223--226. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Naceri, A., Chellali, R., and Hoinville, T. 2011. Depth perception within peripersonal space using head-mounted display. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 20, 3, 254--272. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nilsson, N. C., Serafin, S., and Nordahl, R. 2014. Establishing the range of perceptually natural visual walking speeds for virtual walking-in-place locomotion. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG) 20, 4, 569--578. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nilsson, N. C., Serafin, S., and Nordahl, R. 2015. The effect of head mounted display weight and locomotion method on the perceived naturalness of virtual walking speeds. IEEE, 249--250.Google Scholar
- Palmer, S. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. A Bradford Book.Google Scholar
- Phillips, L., Ries, B., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., and Anderson, L. 2009. Distance perception in npr immersive virtual environments, revisited. In Proceedings of Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV), ACM, 11--14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Phillips, L., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., Ries, B., and Anderson, L. 2012. Correlations between physiological response, gait, personality, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 21, 2, 119--141. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Potmesil, M., and Chakravarty, I. 1983. Modeling motion blur in computer-generated images. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 17, 3, 389--399. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Renner, R. S., Velichkovsky, B. M., and Helmert, J. R. 2013. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments-a review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 46, 2, 23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richardson, A. R., and Waller, D. 2007. Interaction with an immersive virtual environment corrects users' distance estimates. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49, 3, 507--517.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rieser, J. J., Ashmead, D. H., Talor, C. R., and Youngquist, G. A. 1990. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 5, 675--689.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Riguer, G., Tatarchuk, N., and Isidoro, J. 2004. Real-time depth of field simulation. ShaderX2: Shader Programming Tips and Tricks with DirectX 9, 529--556.Google Scholar
- Rolland, J. P., Gibson, W., and Ariely, D. 1995. Towards quantifying depth and size perception in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 4, 1, 24--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ross, J. 2004. The perceived direction and speed of global motion in glass pattern sequences. Vision research 44, 5, 441--448.Google Scholar
- Rousset, T., Bourdin, C., Goulon, C., Monnoyer, J., and Vercher, J.-L. 2015. Does virtual reality affect visual perception of egocentric distance? In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), 277--278.Google Scholar
- Ryu, J., Hashimoto, N., and Sato, M. 2005. Influence of resolution degradation on distance estimation in virtual space displaying static and dynamic image. In Proceedings of Cyber-Worlds, 8--pp. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tarampi, M. R., Creem-Regehr, S. H., and Thompson, W. B. 2010. Intact spatial updating with severely degraded vision. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1, 23--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thompson, W. K., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C. 2004. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence: Tele-operators & Virtual Environments 13, 5, 560--571. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tomura, 31/08/2016. Radial blur postprocess effect. https://www.unrealengine4.de/index.php?thread/176-radial-blur-postprocess-effect/&s=f0b6a81826ce3268b7bc9671804fafd8b82f8a6b.Google Scholar
- Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Thompson, W. B., and Creem-Regehr, S. H. 2008. Effects of stereo viewing conditions on distance perception in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 17, 1, 91--101. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Witmer, B. G., and Kline, P. B. 1998. Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 7, 2, 144--167. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Witmer, B. G., and Sadowski, W. J. 1998. Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40, 3, 478--488.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Visual blur in immersive virtual environments: does depth of field or motion blur affect distance and speed estimation?
Recommendations
Depth-of-field blur effects for first-person navigation in virtual environments
VRST '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technologyThis paper studies the use of visual blur effects, i.e., blurring of parts of the image fed back to the user, for First-Person-Navigations in Virtual Environments (VE). First, we introduce a model of dynamic visual blur for VE which is based on two ...
Stepping off a ledge in an HMD-based immersive virtual environment
SAP '13: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied PerceptionWe explore whether a gender-matched, calibrated self-avatar affects the perception of the affordance of stepping off of a ledge, or visual cliff, in an immersive virtual environment. Visual cliffs form demonstrations in many immersive virtual ...
Audio, visual, and audio-visual egocentric distance perception by moving subjects in virtual environments
We present a study on audio, visual, and audio-visual egocentric distance perception by moving subjects in virtual environments. Audio-visual rendering is provided using tracked passive visual stereoscopy and acoustic wave field synthesis (WFS). ...
Comments