skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2856498acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Ethical Encounters in Human-Computer Interaction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the HCI community, there is growing recognition that a reflective and empathetic approach is needed to conduct ethical research in sensitive settings with people who might be considered vulnerable or marginalized. At our CHI 2015 workshop on ethical encounters, researchers shared personal stories of the challenges and tensions they have faced when conducting HCI research in complex settings such as hospitals, with young mental health patients, in schools for children with disabilities, and with homeless people. These research contexts can present significant challenges for HCI researchers who would not typically receive the training that other professionals working in these environments would normally receive. From our discussions with attendees at the CHI 2015 workshop, we identified a number of ethical issues that researchers are grappling with. In this follow-up workshop we aim to build on the lessons learned and to generate pragmatic but sensitive solutions to manage complex ethical issues for HCI researchers working in challenging settings.

References

  1. Steve Benford et al. 2015. The ethical implications of HCI's turn to the cultural. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22, 5, Article 24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hilary Davis and Jenny Waycott. 2015. Ethical encounters: HCI research in sensitive and complex settings. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OzCHI 2015), 667--669 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ewa Luger, Lachlan Urquhart, Tom Rodden, and Michael Golembewski. 2015. Playing the legal card: Using ideation cards to raise data protection issues within the design process. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Michael Massimi. 2014. Stories from my thanatosensitive design process: Reflections on working with the bereaved. Interactions, 47--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Michael Massimi et al. 2012. Memento Mori: Technology design for end of life. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, 2759--2762. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Roisin McNaney and John Vines. 2015. Blurred lines: A reflection on the ethical dilemmas encountered during the 'Google Glass for Parkinson's' project. In CHI 2015 Workshop on Ethical Encounters in HCI: Research in Sensitive Settings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wendy Moncur 2013. The emotional wellbeing of researchers: Considerations for practice. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1883--1890. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, and Susan O'Donnell. 2014. Fieldwork with vulnerable populations: Ethical implications for humancomputer interaction research. Interactions, 5153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cosmin Munteanu et al. 2015. Situational ethics: Re-thinking approaches to formal ethics requirements for human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Barbara Barbosa Neves et al. 2015. "My hand doesn't listen to me!" Adoption and evaluation of a communication technology for the 'oldest old'. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 15931602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yvonne Rogers 2011. Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory, Interactions, 18, 4, 58--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anja Thieme et al. 2014. Enabling empathy in health and care: Design methods and challenges. Ext. Abstracts CHI, 139--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. John Vines et al. 2013. Designing for - and with - vulnerable people. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2013, 3231--3234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jenny Waycott et al. 2015. Ethical encounters in HCI: Research in sensitive settings. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15), 2369--2372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jenny Waycott et al. 2015. Ethics in evaluating a sociotechnical intervention with socially isolated older adults. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 11, 1518--1528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jenny Waycott et al. 2015. The challenge of technology research in sensitive settings: Case studies in 'sensitive HCI'. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OzCHI 2015), 240--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ethical Encounters in Human-Computer Interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader