David Bar-El
Oren Zuckerman
ABSTRACT
Makerspaces of various models are forming all around the world. We present a model and case study of the Maketec, a public drop-in makerspace for children, run by teens. The Maketec model is designed to promote making and socializing opportunities for girls and boys of ages 9-14. It is based on three underlying principles: (1) "Low Floor/Wide Walls": construction kits and digital fabrication technologies that allow kids to invent and create with no prior knowledge or expertise; (2) "Unstructured Learning": no formal instructors, teens serve as mentors for kids, and promote a culture of self-driven learning through projects; and (3) "A Makerspace as a Third Place": the Maketec is free and managed by kids for kids in an effort to form a unique community of young makers. We report on interviews with four recurring visitors, and discuss our insights around the three principles and the proposed model.
- Ayah Bdeir. 2009. Electronics as material: littleBits. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '09) 397--400. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Paulo Blikstein and Dennis Krannich. 2013. The makers' movement and FabLabs in education: experiences, technologies, and research. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children (IDC '13) 613--616. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paulo Blikstein. 2008. Travels in Troy with Freire: Technology as an Agent for Emancipation. In Social Justice Education for Teachers: Paulo Freire and the possible dream, Carlos Alberto Torres and Pedro Noguera (Eds.). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense, 205--244.Google Scholar
- Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '08), 423--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beginner's Mind Collective, and David Shaw. 2012. Makey Makey: improvising tangible and nature-based user interfaces. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (TEI '12) 367--370. Google ScholarDigital Library
- National Research Council. 2002. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Colleen Graves. 2014. Teen Experts Guide Makerspace Makeover. Knowledge Quest, 42, 8--13.Google Scholar
- Oldenburg, Ray. 1989. The Great Good Place: Café, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You through the Day. Paragon House Publishers.Google Scholar
- Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Irene Posch, Hideaki Ogawa, Christopher Lindinger, Roland Haring, and Horst Hörtner. 2010. Introducing the FabLab as interactive exhibition space. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '10) 254--257. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney, Andres Monroy-Hernández, Natalie Rusk, Evelyn Eastmond, Karen Brennan, Amon Millner, Eric Rosenbaum, Jay Silver, Brian Silverman, and Yasmin Kafai. 2009. Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52, 60--67. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rafi Santo, Kylie Peppler, Dixie Ching, and Christopher Hoadley. 2015. Maybe a Maker Space? Organizational Learning about Maker Education within a Regional Out-of-School Network.Google Scholar
- http://chibitronics.com/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Maketec: A Makerspace as a Third Place for Children
Recommendations
Social Competence and STEM: Teen Mentors in a Makerspace
IDC '16: Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenWe study the experiences of high school student volunteers as mentors in a public makerspace for children. Based on interviews, we present the teenagers' varied backgrounds, doubts, and lessons learned. While most studies around maker activities have ...
Facilitation in an Intergenerational Making Activity: How Facilitative Moves Shift Across Traditional and Digital Fabrication
IDC '19: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenIntergenerational making activities provide an opportunity for family collaboration where parents and children learn together. We discuss the facilitative moves that emerged between researchers, parents, and children during a half-day making program ...
Challenges in starting to design and make together: Examining family engagement in Fab Labs
Highlights- Researchers should devote more attention to informal open-ended digital fabrication and making in Fab Labs for children and families.
- The transformations from brainstorming to 2D or 3D digital designing, and from 2D/3D digital ...
AbstractMaking in a digital fabrication laboratory (Fab Lab) using Fab Lab processes is generally challenging for novice makers, particularly for families with young children. We conducted a qualitative study on family engagement in open-ended digital ...
Comments