skip to main content
10.1145/2700648.2809851acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Disability and Technology: A Critical Realist Perspective

Published:26 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Assistive technology (AT) as a field explores the design, use and evaluation of computing technology that aims to benefit people with disabilities. The majority of the work consequently takes the functional needs of people with disabilities as starting point and matches those with technological opportunity spaces. With this paper, we argue that the underlying philosophical position implied in this approach can be seen as reductionist as the disabled experience is arguably richer and often more complex as can be projected from the functional limitations of people. Thinkers and activists in Disability Studies have conceptualised disability in various ways and more recently, critical realism was proposed as a philosophical position through which the many different facets of the disabled experience could be incorporated. In this paper, we explore the possibility of using a critical realist perspective to guide designers in developing technology for people with disabilities and thereby aim to contribute to the philosophical underpinnings of AT. After a brief review of historical conceptualisations of disability, we introduce the critical realist argument and discuss its appeal for understanding disability and the possible roles technology can have in this context. Subsequently, we aim to translate this philosophical and moral debate into a research agenda for AT and exemplify how it can be operationalised by presenting the OutsideTheBox project as a case study.

References

  1. Benton, L., Vasalou, A., Khaled, R., Johnson, H., and Gooch, D. Diversity for Design: A Framework for Involving Neurodiverse Children in the Technology Design Process. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 3747--3756. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bhaskar, R. A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds Books, Leeds, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers, J. The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of 'research through design'. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS '12, ACM (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 2012), 68--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Collier, A. Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosopy. Verso, London, UK, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Corker, M., and Shakespeare, T. Mapping the Terrain. In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Studies, M. Corker and T. Shakespeare, Eds. Continuum International Publishing Group, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalton, N. S. Neurodiversity & HCI. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '13, ACM (Paris, France, 2013), 2295--2304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G., and Iversen, O. S. In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74, 0 (2015), 93 -- 106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harris, J. One principle and three fallacies of disability studies. Journal of Medical Ethics 27, 6 (Dec. 2001), 383--387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Harrison, S., Tatar, D., and Sengers, P. The three paradigms of HCI. In Proceedings of alt.chi, ACM SIGCHI (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, enlarged, 2nd edition ed. University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lopez, J., and Potter, G., Eds. After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism, 1st ed. The Athlone Press, Contiuum imprint, London, UK, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mankoff, J., Hayes, G. R., and Kasnitz, D. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, ASSETS '10, ACM (Orlando, Florida, USA, 2010), 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Newell, A. F., Gregor, P., Morgan, M., Pullin, G., and Macaulay, C. User-Sensitive Inclusive Design. Universal Access in the Information Society 10, 3 (July 2010), 235--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, U. Fundamental principles of disability. Summary of a meeting, London, UK, Nov. 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Oliver, M. The politics of disablement. Palgrave Macmillan, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Organization, W. H. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Tech. rep., Geneva, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pullin, G. Design Meets Disability. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, Sept. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rittel, H., and Webber, M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanders, E., and Westerlund, B. Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. In Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference (May 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Shakespeare, T. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited, second endition ed. Routledge, Oxon UK, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Shinohara, K. A new approach for the design of assistive technologies: design for social acceptance. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 102 (2012), 45--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shinohara, K., and Wobbrock, J. O. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2011), 705--714. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Söder, M. Tensions, perspectives and themes in disability studies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 11, 2 (June 2009), 67--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. WHO, W. H. O. Autism Spectrum Disorders & Other Developmental Disorders -- From Raising Awareness to Building Capacity, December 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wobbrock, J. O., Kane, S. K., Gajos, K. Z., Harada, S., and Froehlich, J. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 3, 3 (Apr. 2011), 9:1--9:27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Disability and Technology: A Critical Realist Perspective

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '15: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility
        October 2015
        466 pages
        ISBN:9781450334006
        DOI:10.1145/2700648

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 October 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ASSETS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate30of127submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader