Anna Eckerdal
Neena Thota
Judy Sheard
Lauri Malmi
ABSTRACT
During the past two years, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have created wide interest in the academic world raising both enthusiasm for new opportunities for universities and many concerns for the future of university education. The discussion has mainly appeared in non-scientific forums, such as magazine articles, columns and blogs, making it difficult to judge wider opinions within academia. To collect more rigorous data we surveyed teachers, researchers, and academic managers on their opinions and experiences of MOOCs. In this paper, we present our analysis of responses from the computer science academic community (n=137). Their feelings about MOOCs are highly mixed. Content analysis of open-ended questions revealed that the most often mentioned positive aspects included affordances of MOOCs, freedom of time and location for studying, and the possibility to experience teaching from top-level international teachers/experts. The most common negative aspects included concerns about pedagogical designs of MOOCs, assessment practices, and lack of interaction with the teacher. About half the respondents claimed they had not changed their teaching as a result of MOOCs, a small number used MOOCs as learning resources and very few were engaging with MOOCs in any significant way.
- Bates, T. What's right and what's wrong about Coursera-style MOOCs? {Web log message}. 2012, August 5. http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-andwhats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/Google Scholar
- Ben-Ari, M. 2013. MOOCs on introductory programming: a travelogue. ACM Inroads, 4, 2 (June, 2013), 58--61. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooper, S. and Sahami, M. 2013. Reflections on Stanford's MOOCs. Commun. ACM, 56, 2 (February, 2013), 28--30. DOI=10.1145/2408776.2408787 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J. and Dziuban, C. ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, Louisville, CO, 2013.Google Scholar
- Guzdial, M. MOOCs today are about less data for the teacher. {Web log message}. 2013, June 11. http://computinged.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/moocs-today-are-about-less-data-for-the-teacher/Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. H. 2013. Teaching a "MOOC:" Experiences from the front line. In Proceedings of the Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting (DSP/SPE) (August 11--14, 2013).Google Scholar
- Kolowich, S. The professors who make the MOOCs. 2013. http://chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905/#id=overviewGoogle Scholar
- Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A. and Williams, S. A. 2013. MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008--2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14, 3 (June, 2013), 202--227.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin, F. G. 2012. Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Commun. ACM, 55, 8 (August, 2012), 26--28. DOI=10.1145/2240236.2240246 Google ScholarDigital Library
- McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G. and Cormier, D. The MOOC model for digital practice. University of Prince Edward Island, 2010.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, Thousands Oaks: CA.Google Scholar
- Perna, L., Ruby, A., Boruch, R., Wang, N., Scull, J., Evans, C. and Ahmad, S. The Life Cycle of a Million MOOC Users. In Proceedings of the MOOC Research Initiative Conference (Arlington, Texas, USA, December 5--6, 2013).Google Scholar
- Severance, C. 2013. MOOCs: An Insider's View. Computer, 46, 10 (October, 2013), 93--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Touve, D. MOOC's Contradictions. 2012, September 11. http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2012/09/11/essay-contradiction-facing-moocs-and-their-university-sponsorsGoogle Scholar
- Vala, A. Adoption of Massive Open Online Courses {Worldwide Survey}. 2013. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vala-afshar/infographic-adoption-of-m_b_3303789.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Vardi, M. Y. 2012. Will MOOCs destroy academia? Commun. ACM, 55, 11 (November, 2012), 5--5. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vihavainen, A., Luukkainen, M. and Kurhila, J. 2012. Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE'12) (Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2012). ACM, NY, New York, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Teaching and learning with MOOCs: computing academics' perspectives and engagement
Recommendations
MOOCs and their impact on academics
Koli Calling '14: Proceedings of the 14th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education ResearchMassive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have recently become a hot topic in the academic world, launching a wide ranging discussion on a number of issues. In this research, we surveyed academics' awareness, attitudes, perceptions, and experiences of MOOCs. ...
Neither Completely M- Nor E- Learning: Integrating both is the Solution
ICCBDC '17: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Cloud and Big Data ComputingThe rapid growth in technology and communication has a massive effect in all domains, including the education sector. The teaching paradigms were evolved from traditional face-to-face and distance learning to e-learning, open learning and recently m-...
Distance Learning Nowadays: the Usage of Didactic Potential of MOOCs (on platforms Coursera, edX, Universarium) in Higher Education.
ICEMT '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education and Multimedia TechnologyThe challenges of the present days not only identify trends but also arrange priorities in high education. Distance format has replaced (temporarily or not) offline learning and has determined new approaches in educational process organization. Massive ...
Comments