Jessica Vitak
Jinyoung Kim
ABSTRACT
Guided by the underlying question of how--if at all--the self-disclosure process varies online, the present study explores the self-disclosure practices of 26 American graduate students on Facebook through in-depth interviews. Building on work by Derlega and Grzelak [12] on self- disclosure goals and focusing on the affordances of the site, findings reveal both commonalities with and extensions to existing communication research on self-disclosure, as users saw both benefits and drawbacks to the high visibility and persistence of content shared through the site. Furthermore, users employed a wide spectrum of strategies to help them achieve their disclosure goals while decreasing perceived risks associated with making disclosures in a public forum. Importantly, these strategies generally sought to recreate the offline boundaries blurred or removed by the technical structure of the site and allow users to engage in a more strategic disclosure process with their network.
- Altman, I. The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory and Crowding. Brooks/Cole. Monterey, CA, 1975.Google Scholar
- Altman, I. and Taylor, D. Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Holt, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
- Baumeister, R.F. A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin 91, 1 (1982), 3--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baxter, L.A. and Montgomery, B.M. Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. Guilford Press, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
- boyd, d. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi, ed., Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. 2010, 39--58.Google Scholar
- boyd, d. Networked privacy. Surveillance & Society 10, 3 (2012), 348--350.Google Scholar
- Brenner, J. and Smith, A. 72% of Online Adults are Social Networking Site Users. Pew Internet Project, 2013.Google Scholar
- Buhrmester, D. and Prager, K. Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence. In K. Rotenberg, ed., Disclosure Processes in Children and Adolescents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995, 10--56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burke, M. Kraut, R. and Marlow, C. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proc. CSCW, ACM Press (2011), 571--580. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Das, S. and Kramer, A. Self-censorship on Facebook. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, In Proc. ICWSM, AAAI Press (2013).Google Scholar
- 1Derlega, V.J. and Chaikin, A.L. Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships. Journal of Social Issues 33, 3 (1977), 102--115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Derlega, V.J. and Grzelak, J. Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In G.J. Chelune, ed., Self-Disclosure: Origins, Patterns, and Implications of Openness in Interpersonal Relationships. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1979, 151--176.Google Scholar
- Ellison, N. and boyd, d. Sociality through social network sites. In W.H. Dutton, ed., Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013, 151--172.Google Scholar
- Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Gray, R., and Lampe, C. Cultivating social resources: The relationship between bridging social capital and Facebook use among adults. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, (in press).Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday Anchor, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
- Gross, R. and Acquisti, A. Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proc. ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society 2005, ACM Press (2005), 71--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hampton, K.N., Goulet, L.S., Rainie, L., and Purcell, K. Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Internet Project, 2011.Google Scholar
- Hogan, B. The Presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30, 6 (2010), 377--386.Google Scholar
- Lampinen, A., Lehtinen, V., Lehmuskallio, A., and Tamminen, S. We're in it together: Interpersonal management of disclosure in social network services. In Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2011), 3217--3226. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 1985.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 2Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan. M., Smith, A., and Beaton, M. Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Internet Project, 2013.Google Scholar
- 2Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1994.Google Scholar
- Omarzu, J. A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4, 2 (2000), 174--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.Google Scholar
- Parks, M.R. Ideology in interpersonal communication: Off the couch and into the world. Communication Yearbook 5, (1982), 79--107.Google Scholar
- Petronio, S. Boundaries of Privacy. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 2002.Google Scholar
- Rosenfeld, L.B. Self--disclosure avoidance: Why I am afraid to tell you who I am. Communication Monographs 46, 1 (1979), 63--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sleeper, M., Balebako, R., Das, S., McConahy, A.L., Wiese, J., and Cranor, L.F. The post that wasn't: Exploring self-censorship on Facebook. In Proc. CSCW, ACM Press (2013), 793--802. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stiles, W.B., Shuster, P.L., and Harrigan, J.A. Disclosure and anxiety: A test of the Fever Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (1992), 980--988.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.Google Scholar
- 3Stutzman, F., Capra, R., and Thompson, J. Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1 (2011), 590--598. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3Stutzman, F. and Hartzog, W. Boundary regulation in social media. In Proc. CSCW, ACM Press (2012), 769--778. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3Treem, J.W. and Leonardi, P.M. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordance of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook 36 (2012), 143--189.Google Scholar
- Vitak, J. Keeping connected in the Facebook age: The relationship between Facebook use, relationship maintenance strategies, and relational outcomes. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
- Vitak, J. The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56, 4 (2012), 451--470.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vitak, J. and Ellison, N.B. "There's a network out there you might as well tap": Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society 15, (2013), 243--259.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3Vitak, J., Lampe, C., Ellison, N., and Gray, R. "Why won't you be my Facebook Friend?": Strategies for dealing with context collapse in the workplace. In Proc. 7th Annual iConference, ACM Press (2012), 555--557. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3Wheeless, L.R. and Grotz, J. Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research 2, 4 (1976), 338--346.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- "You can't block people offline": examining how facebook's affordances shape the disclosure process
Recommendations
Privacy antecedents for SNS self-disclosure
Social networking sites privacy issues and self-disclosure are examined.A research model of privacy issues and self-disclosure is built.Structural equations modeling is used to assess the model fit.Path analysis is done to analyze hypothesis whereas 11 ...
How lonely people use and perceive Facebook
This study examined the relationship between loneliness and various aspects of Facebook use including use activity, self-disclosure, attitudes, and satisfaction. Data were collected through an online survey among adult Facebook users (N=536). Results ...
Voices that cannot be heard: Can shyness explain how we communicate on Facebook versus face-to-face?
Social networking sites have gained popularity among all populations, especially young adults. Personality traits were found to be predictive of how individuals use social media. Therefore, this study sought to examine the association between shyness ...
Comments