skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531644acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Standing on the schemas of giants: socially augmented information foraging

Published:15 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

People spend an enormous amount of time searching for complex information online; for example, consumers researching new purchases or patients learning about their conditions. As they search, people build up rich mental schemas about their target domains; which, if effectively shared, could accelerate learning for others with similar interests. In this paper we introduce a novel approach for integrating the schemas individuals develop as they gather information online and surfacing them for others with similar interests. Through a controlled experiment we show that having access to others' schemas while foraging for information helps new users to induce more useful, prototypical, and better-structured schemas than gathering information alone.

References

  1. Amershi and Morris, M.R. CoSearch: A system for colocated collaborative web search. In Proc. CHI 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baldonado, M.W. and Winograd, F. SenseMaker: an information-exploration interface supporting the contextual evolution of a user's interests. In Proc. CHI 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bao, S., Wu, X. Fei, B., Xue, G., Su, Z. and Yu, Y. Optimizing web search using social annotations. In Proc. WWW 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Card, S.K., Robertson, G.G. and York, W. The WebBook and the Web Forager: Video use scenarios for a World-Wide Web information workspace. In Proc. CHI 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Catledge, L.D. and Pitkow, J.E. Characterizing browsing strategies in the World Wide Web. In Proc. WWW 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. and Glaser, R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 5, 2, (1981), 121--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Choo, C.W., Detlor, B. and Turnbull, D. Information seeking on the Web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday 5, 2, (2000).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cutting, D.R., Karger, D.R. and Pedersen, J.O. Constant interaction-time scatter/gather browsing of very large document collections. In Proc. SIGIR 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dmitriev, P.A., Eiron, N., Fontoura, M. and Shekita, E. Using Annotations in Enterprise Search. In Proc. WWW 2006, 811--817. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dontcheva, M., Drucker, S., Wade, G., Salesin, D. and Cohen, M. Collecting and Organizing Web Content. In Proc. SIGIR 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, B.M. and Chi, E.H. Towards a Model of Understanding Social Search. In Proc. CSCW 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fisher, K., Counts, S. and Kittur, A. Distributed sensemaking: improving sensemaking by leveraging the efforts of previous users. In Proc. CHI 2012, 247--256 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Freyne, J., Farzan, R., Brusilovsky, P., Smyth, B. and Coyle, M. Collecting community wisdom: integrating social search & social navigation. In Proc. UIST 2007, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Gomez, L.M. and Dumais, S.T. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. CACM 30, 11, ACM Press (1987), 964971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Glance, N. S. Community search assistant. In Proc. IUI 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B.M. and Terry, D. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. CACM 35, 12, (1992), 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Golder, S.A. and Huberman, B.A. Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science 32, 2, (2006), 198--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B. and Scott, J. Social book marking tools (i) - a general review. D-Lib Magazine 11, 4, (2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hofgesang, P.I. Web personalisation through incremental individual profiling and support-based user segmentation. In Proc. IEEE 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hong, L, Chi, E.H., Budiu, R., Pirolli, P. and Nelson, L. SparTag.us: Low Cost Tagging System for Foraging of Web Content. In Proc AVI 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hummel, J.E. and Holyoak, K.J. Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review 104, (1997), 427--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kandogan, E. and Shneiderman, B. Elastic Windows: evaluation of multi-window operations. In Proc CHI 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kellar, M., Watters, C. and Shepherd, M. A Field Study Characterizing Web-Based Information-Seeking Tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 58, 7, (2007), 999--1018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Klein, G., Moon, B. and Hoffman, R.R. Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model. In Proc. IEEE 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kittur, A., Peters, A.M., Diriye, A., Telang, T. and Bove, M.R. Costs and benefits of structured information foraging. In Proc. CHI 2013, 2989--2998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kittur, A., Suh, B. and Chi, E.H. Can you ever trust a wiki?: impacting perceived trustworthiness in Wikipedia. In Proc. CSCW 2008, 477--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Konstan, J.A., Miller, B.N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J.L., Gordon, L.R. and Riedl. J. GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. CACM 40, 3, (2007), 77--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Large, A., Beheshti, J. and Rahman, T. Gender Differences in Collaborative Web Searching Behavior: An Elementary School Study. Information Processing and Management 38, (2002), 427--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lee, K.J. What Goes Around Comes Around: An Analysis of del.icio.us as Social Space. In Proc. CSCW 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lerman, K. Social Information Processing in News Aggregation. In Proc. IEEE 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Maarek, Y.S., Jacovi, M., Shtalhaim, M., Ur, S., Zernik, D. and Ben-Shaul, I.Z. WebCutter: a system for dynamic and tailorable site mapping. In Proc. WWW 1997, 1269--1279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. MacKay, B., Kellar, M. and Watters, C. An evaluation of landmarks for re-finding information on the Web. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Marchionini, G. Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mathes, A. Folksonomies -- Cooperative Classification and Communication through Shared Metadata. http://www.adammathes.com/academic /computermediatedcommunication/folksonomies.html. (December 2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Millen, D.R., Feinberg, J. and Kerr, B. Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise. In Proc. CHI 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Morris, M.R. A Survey of Collaborative Web Search Practices. In Proc. CHI 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Morris, M.R. and Horvitz, E. SearchTogether: An Interface for Collaborative Web Search. In Proc. UIST 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Munro, A.J., Hook, K., and Benyon, D.R. Eds. Personal and Social Navigation of Information Space. SpringerVerlag (1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Muralidharan, A, Gyongyi, Z. and Chi, E. Social annotations in web search. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1085--1094. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., boyd, d. and Davis, M. HT06, Tagging Paper, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, To Read. In Proc. HT06, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Paul, S.A. and Morris, M.W. CoSense: Enhancing Sensemaking for Collaborative Web Search. In Proc. CHI 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Paul, S.A., Reddy, M.C. Sensemaking in collaborative web search. Human Computer Interaction 26, 72--122 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Pirolli, P. and Card, S.K. Information foraging in information access environments. In Proc. CHI 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Pirolli, P. and Card, S.K. Information foraging. Psychological Review 106, (1999), 643--675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Russell, D.M., Stefik, M.J., Pirolli, P. and Card, S.K. The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proc. CHI 1993, 269--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Schraefel, M., Zhu, Y., Modjeska, D., Wigdor, D. and Zhao, S. Hunter gatherer: interaction support for the creation and management of within-web-page collections. In Proc. WWW 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Sharma, N. Role of available and provided resources in sensemaking. In Proc. CHI 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Shneiderman, B. Designing trust into online experiences. CACM 43, 12, (2000), 57--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Smyth, B., Balfe, E., Boydell, O., Bradley, K., Briggs, P., Coyle, M. and Freyne, J. A liveuser evaluation of collaborative web search. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Tauscher, L. and Greenberg, S. How people revisit Web pages: Empirical findings and implications for the design of history systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47, (1997), 97--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Twidale, M., Nichols, D. and Paice, C. Browsing is a Collaborative Process. Information Processing and Management 33, 6, (1997), 761--783. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Wu, X., Zhang, L. and Yu, Y. Exploring Social Annotations for the Semantic Web. In Proc. WWW 2006, 417426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Yanbe, Y., Jatowt, A., Nakamura, S. and Tanaka, K. Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web? In Proc. ACM/IEEE-CS joint conf. on Digital libraries 2007, 107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Zanardi, V. and Capra, L. Social ranking: uncovering relevant content using tag-based recommender systems. In Proc. ACM RecSys 2008, 51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Standing on the schemas of giants: socially augmented information foraging

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
      February 2014
      1600 pages
      ISBN:9781450325400
      DOI:10.1145/2531602

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 February 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate134of497submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader