skip to main content
10.1145/2492517.2492527acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting political preference of Twitter users

Published:25 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We study the problem of predicting the political preference of users on the Twitter network, showing that the political preference of users can be predicted from their interaction with political parties. We show this by building prediction models based on a variety of contextual and behavioural features, training the models by resorting to a distant supervision approach and considering party candidates to have a predefined preference towards their parties. A language model for each party is learned from the content of the tweets by the party candidates, and the preference of a user is assessed based on the alignment of user tweets with the language models of the parties. We evaluate our work in the context of Alberta 2012 general election, and show that our model outperforms, in terms of the F-measure, sentiment and text classification approaches and is in par with the human annotators. We further use our model to analyze the preference changes over the course of the election campaign and report results that would be difficult to attain by human annotators.

References

  1. F. Benevenuto, G. Magno, T. Rodrigues, and V. Almeida, "Detecting Spammers on Twitter," Jul. 2010. {Online}. Available: http://ceas.cc/2010/papers/Paper%2021.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Choy, M. L. F. Cheong, M. N. Laik, and K. P. Shung, "A sentiment analysis of singapore presidential election 2011 using twitter data with census correction," CoRR, vol. abs/1108.5520, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Conover, B. Gonçalves, J. Ratkiewicz, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer, "Predicting the political alignment of twitter users," in SocialCom/PASSAT, 2011, pp. 192--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Conover, J. Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, B. Gonçalves, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini, "Political polarization on twitter," in ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Fleiss et al., "Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 378--382, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Golbeck and D. L. Hansen, "Computing political preference among twitter followers," in CHI, 2011, pp. 1105--1108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Hu and B. Liu, "Mining and summarizing customer reviews," in KDD, 2004, pp. 168--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Livne, M. P. Simmons, E. Adar, and L. A. Adamic, "The party is over here: Structure and content in the 2010 election," in ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Marchetti-Bowick and N. Chambers, "Learning for microblogs with distant supervision: Political forecasting with twitter," in EACL, 2012, pp. 603--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. Mustafaraj, S. Finn, C. Whitlock, and P. T. Metaxas, "Vocal minority versus silent majority: Discovering the opionions of the long tail," in SocialCom/PASSAT, 2011, pp. 103--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. O'Connor, R. Balasubramanyan, B. R. Routledge, and N. A. Smith, "From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series," in ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. S. Rad, A. Makazhanov, D. Rafiei, and D. Barbosa, "Leveraging editor collaboration patterns in wikipedia," in HT, 2012, pp. 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Sparks, "Birds of a feather tweet together: Partisan structure in online social networks, presented at the 2010 meeting of the midwest political science association."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas, "Sentiment strength detection in short informal text," JASIST, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 2544--2558, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Tumasjan, T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe, "Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment," in ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H. Wang, D. Can, A. Kazemzadeh, F. Bar, and S. Narayanan, "A system for real-time twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 u.s. presidential election cycle," in ACL (System Demonstrations), 2012, pp. 115--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. wikipedia.org, "Alberta general election, 2012: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberta_general_election,_2012."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Predicting political preference of Twitter users

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ASONAM '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
          August 2013
          1558 pages
          ISBN:9781450322409
          DOI:10.1145/2492517

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 August 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate116of549submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          KDD '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader