skip to main content
research-article

Wild at Home: The Neighborhood as a Living Laboratory for HCI

Published:01 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

HCI can “turn to the wild” but still stay home. Local community life presents a rich context for understanding challenges and possibilities of information technology. We summarize and reflect upon a program of participatory design research in which we facilitated activities and experiences of our neighbors through developing a series of community-oriented programs and information systems through the past two decades. We organize these reflections around five overlapping themes: visibility of community actors, creation of community information infrastructures, the role of place-based identity and activity in community, the effectiveness of participatory relationships, and the research designs and methods appropriate. We frame these reflections around a conceptual model of community, and the suggestion that the local community can be a living laboratory for HCI in the wild.

References

  1. Agostini, A., De Michelis, G., Divitini, M., Grasso, M. A., and Snowdon, D. 2002. Design and deployment of community systems: Reflections on the Campiello experience. Interact. Comput. 14, 689--712.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., and Smith, D. M. 1985. Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartle, R. A. 2003. Designing Virtual Worlds. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bellotti, V., Carroll, J. M., and Han, K. 2013. Random acts of kindness: The intelligent and context-aware future of reciprocal altruism and community collaboration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems. IEEE, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Holst, M., and Ståhlbröst, A. 2009. Concept design with a living lab approach. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bruckman, A. and Resnick, M. 1995. The MediaMOO project: Constructionism and professional community. Convergence 1, 1, 94--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai, G. and Yu, B. 2009. Spatial annotation technology for public deliberation. Trans. GIS 13, s1, 123--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Carroll, J. M. 2000. Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Carroll, J. M. 2001. Community computing as human-computer interaction. Behav. Inf. Tech. 20, 5, 307--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Carroll, J. M., Ed. 2003. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, J. M. 2012. The Neighborhood and the Internet: Design Research Projects in Community Informatics. Advances in Sociology. Routledge, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Carroll, J. M. 2013. Co-production scenarios for mobile time banking. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on End-User Development. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll, J. M. and Farooq, U. 2007. Patterns as a paradigm for theory in community-based learning. Int. J. Comput.-Supp. Coll. Learn. 2, 1, 41--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Carroll, J. M. and Isenhour, P. L. 2011. Moving from MOOsburg. Int. J. Web-based Communit. 7, 1, 4--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B 1996. Developing the Blacksburg electronic village. Comm. ACM, 39, 12, 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B. 2001. Better home shopping or new democracy? Evaluating community network outcomes, In Proceedings of CHI‘01, ACM, New York, 372--379. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B. 2003. A trajectory for community networks. Inf. Soc. 19, 15, 381--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B. 2007. Participatory design in community informatics. Design Stud. 28, 243--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B. 2008. Theorizing mobility in community networks. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 66, 944--962. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Carroll, J. M., Kellogg, W. A., and Rosson, M. B. 1991. The task-artifact cycle. In Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. J. M. Carroll Ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, 74--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Van Metre, C. A., Kengeri, R., Kelso, J., and Darshani, M. 1999. Blacksburg nostalgia: A community history archive. In Proceedings of 7th IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT’99). M. A. Sasse and C. Johnson Eds., IOS Press/IFIP, 637--647.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Carroll, J. M., Chin, G., Rosson, M. B., and Neale, D. C. 2000. The development of cooperation: Five years of participatory design in the virtual school. In Designing Interactive Systems, D. Boyarski and W. Kellogg Eds., ACM, New York. 239--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Isenhour, P. L., Van Metre, C., Schaefer, W. A., and Ganoe, C. H. 2001. MOOsburg: Multi-user domain support for a community network. Internet Res. 11, 1, 65--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Carroll, J. M., Choo, C. W., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P. L., Kerr, S. T., MacLean, A., and Rosson, M. B. 2003. Knowledge management support for teachers. Educ. Tech. Res. Develop. 51, 4, 42--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., and Zhou, J. 2005. Collective efficacy as a measure of community. In Proceedings of CHI’05 Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Kavanaugh, A., Dunlap, D., Schafer, W., Snook, J., and Isenhour, P. 2006. Social and civic participation in a community network. In Computers, Phones, and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology. R. Kraut, M. Brynin and S. Kiesler Eds., Oxford University Press, New York, 168--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Carroll, J. M., Bach, P., Rosson, M. B., Merkel, C. B., Farooq, U., and Xiao, L. 2008. Community IT workshops as a strategy for community learning. First Monday, 13, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Farooq, U., and Xiao, L. 2009. Beyond being aware, Inf. Org. 19, 3, 162--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Carroll, J. M., Snook, J., and Isenhour, P. L. 2009. Logging home use of the Internet in the Blacksburg Electronic Village. Int. J. Adv. Media Commun. 3, 3, 333--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Carroll, J. M., Horning, M., Hoffman, B., Ganoe, C. H., Robinson, H., and Rosson, M. B. 2011. Visions, participation, and engagement in new information infrastructures. J. Commun. Inf. 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen, Y., Harper, F. M., Konstan, J., and Xin Li, S. 2010. Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on movielens. Amer. Econ. Rev. 100, 4, 1358--1398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Chin, G. and Rosson, M. B. 1998. Progressive design: Staged evolution of scenarios in the design of a collaborative science learning environment. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’98). ACM, New York, 611--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Chin, G., Rosson, M. B., and Carroll, J. M. 1997. Participatory analysis: Shared development of requirements from scenarios. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’97). ACM, New York, 162--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Cohill, A. and Kavanaugh, A., Eds. 2000. Community Networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia. Artech House, Norwood, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Soc. 94, S95--S120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Costabile, M. F., Fogli, D., Mussio, P., and Piccinno, A. 2005. A meta-design approach to end-user development. In Proceedings of Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing: VL/HCC. IEEE, 308--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. de Tocqueville, A. 2003. Democracy in America (original edition 1835). G. Bevan Trans., Penguin Classics, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. DiSalvo, C., Louw, M., Coupland, J., and Steiner, M. 2009. Local issues, local uses: Tools for robotics and sensing in community contexts. In Proceedings of Creativity and Cognition (C&C’’09). ACM, 245--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Dourish, P. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Farhi, P. 1991. Taking local coverage to the limit: 24-hour cable news. Washington Post, March 11, F25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Farooq, U., Ganoe, C. H., Xiao, L., Merkel, C. B., Rosson, M. B., and Carroll, J. M. 2007. Supporting community-based learning: Case study of a geographical community organization designing their web site. Behav. Inf. Tech. 26, 1, 5--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Fischer, G. and Scharff, E. 2000. Meta-design: Design for designers. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’00). ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Foth, M., Schroeter, R., and Anastasiu, I. 2011. Fixing the city one photo at a time: Mobile logging of maintenance requests. In Proceedings of OzCHI’11. ACM Press, New York, 126--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Ganoe, C. H., Robinson, et al. 2010. Mobile awareness and participation in community-oriented activities. In Proceedings of COM.Geo’10. ACM, New York, Article 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Goggins, S. P., Mascaro, C., and Mascaro, S. 2012. Relief work after the 2010 Haiti Earthquake: Leadership in an online resource coordination network. In Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM Press, New York, 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Greenbaum, J., and Kyng, M., Eds. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Hampton, K., Lee, C.-J., and Her, E. J. 2011. How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media Soc. 13, 7, 1031--1049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Haythornthwaite, C. and Kendall, L. 2010. Internet and community. Amer. Behavioral Sci. 53, 8, 1083--1094.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Hess, J. and Ogonowski, C. 2010. Steps toward a living lab for SocialMedia concept evaluation and continuous user-involvement. In Proceedings of EuroITV’10. ACM, New York, 171--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Hester, R. T. 1993. Sacred structures and everyday life: A return to Manteo, NC. In Dwelling, Seeing, and Designing: Toward a Phenomenological Ecology. D. Seamon Ed., State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 271--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Hummon, D. M. 1992. Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. Hum. Behav. Environ. Adv. Theory Res. 12, 253--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Huysman, M. and Wulf, V., Eds. 2004. Social Capital and Information Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Isenhour, P. L., Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Rosson, M. B., and Dunlap, D. R. 2000. The Virtual School: An integrated collaborative environment for the classroom. Educ. Technol. Soc. 3, 3, 74--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Isenhour, P., Rosson, M. B., and Carroll, J. M. 2001. Supporting interactive collaboration on the Web with CORK. Interact. Comput. 13, 655--676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Ishida, T. 1998. Towards communityware. New Generation Comput. 16, 5--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Karasti, H., Baker, K., and Millerand, F. 2010. Infrastructure time: Long-term matters in collaborative development. Comput. Support. Cooperat. Work 19, 3, 377--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Kavanaugh, A. L., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Reese, D. D., and Zin, T. T. 2005a. Participating in civil society: The case of networked communities. Interact. Comput. 17, 1, 9--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Kavanaugh, A. L., Reese, D. D., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. 2005b. Weak ties in networked communities. The Inf. Soc. 21, 2, 119--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Kensing, F. and Blomberg, J. 1998. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Comput.-Support. Cooperat. Work 7, 167--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Kim, B. J., Kavanaugh, A. L., and Hult, K. M. 2011. Civic engagement and internet use in local governance: Hierarchical linear models for understanding the role of local community groups. Administration Soc. 43, 7, 807--835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Maunder, A., Marsden, G., and Harper, R. 2011. Making the link -- Providing mobile media for novice communities in the developing world. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 69, 647--657. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. McPhail, B., Costantino, T., Bruckmann, D., Barclay, R., and Clement, A. 1998. ‘CAVEAT exemplar: Participatory design in a non-profit volunteer organisation. Comput.-Support. Cooperat. Work 7, 223--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Merkel, C. B., Xiao, L., Farooq, U., Ganoe, C. H., Lee, R., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. 2004. Participatory design in community computing contexts: Tales from the field. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. ACM, New York, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Merkel, C., Farooq, U., Xiao, L., Ganoe, C., Rosson, M. B., and Carroll, J. M. 2007. Managing technology use and learning in nonprofit community organizations: Methodological challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Human Interaction For the Management of Information Technology. ACM, New York, Article 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Oldenburg, R. 1989. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, And How They Get You Through The Day. Paragon House, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Palen, L., Hiltz, S. R., and Liu, S. B. 2007. Online forums supporting grassroots participation in emergency preparedness and response. Comm. ACM 50, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., and McKenzie, R. D. 1925. The City: Suggestions for the Study of Human Nature in the Urban Environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Preece, J. 2000. Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability. Wiley, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Rosson, M. B. and Carroll, J. M. 2002. Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Rosson, M. B. and Carroll, J. M. 2003. Cross-generational learning and collaboration in simulation programming. In Communities and Technologies: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Communities and Technologies, M. Huysman, E. Wenger, and V. Wulf Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 205--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosson, M. B., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P. L., and Carroll, J. M. 2007. Teacher bridge: Creating a community of teacher developers. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. IEEE Digital Library. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Sanoff, H. 2000. Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Schafer, W. A., Ganoe, C. H., Xiao L., Coch, G., and Carroll, J. M. 2005. Designing the next generation of distributed, geocollaborative tools. Cartogr. Geograph. Inf. Sci. 32, 2, 81--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Serrano, N. and Torres, J. N. 2010. Web 2.0 for practitioners. IEEE Softw. 27, 3, 11--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Schroeter, R. 2012. Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city. In Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM, New York, 27--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Schroeter, R., Foth, M., and Satchell, C. 2012. People, content, location: Sweet spotting urban screens for civic engagement. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’12). ACM, New York, 146--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. 1989. Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Stud. Sci. 19, 3, 387--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Star, S. L. and Ruhleder, K. 1994. Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’94). ACM, New York, 253--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Suchman, L. A. 1995. Making work visible. Comm. ACM, 38, 9, 56--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Taylor, N. and Cheverst, K. 2009. Social interaction around a rural community photo display. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 67, 1037--1047. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Tönnies, F. 2002. Community and Society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). (original edition 1887) C. P. Loomis Trans and Ed., Dover, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Tyack, D. and Cuban, L. 1995. Tinkering Toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Van Der Merwe, R. and Meehan, A. 2010. Direct deliberative local governance using online media --- Consensual problem solving or a recalcitrant pluralism? In From e-Participation to Online Deliberation, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Online Deliberation (OD’10). F. De Cindio, A. Macintosh, and C. Peraboni Eds., University of Leeds Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Warren, R. 1978. The Community in America. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Kapuire, G. K., Bidwell, N. J., and Blake, E. 2010. Being participated: A community approach. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference (PDC’10). ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N. J., and Blake, E. 2012. Community consensus: Design beyond participation. Design Issues 28, 3, 89--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Wild at Home: The Neighborhood as a Living Laboratory for HCI

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
          ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 20, Issue 3
          Special Issue of “The Turn to The Wild”
          July 2013
          177 pages
          ISSN:1073-0516
          EISSN:1557-7325
          DOI:10.1145/2491500
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 July 2013
          • Accepted: 1 March 2013
          • Revised: 1 January 2013
          • Received: 1 July 2012
          Published in tochi Volume 20, Issue 3

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader