ABSTRACT
Past research has demonstrated a link between perceptions of social capital and use of the popular social network site, Facebook. Williams' Internet Social Capital Scales, based on Putnam's formulation, tap into sub-dimensions of social capital that have not been broadly used yet may enlighten our understanding of the different ways in which connecting with others online can facilitate access to resources embedded within our social relationships. In this study, we segment Williams' Internet Social Capital Scales into various sub-dimensions using factor analysis and explicate the distinct facets of social capital through a lab experiment in which Facebook users (N=98) request a small favor from their Facebook network. We find that some sub-dimensions play a significant role in getting favors from Facebook friends while bonding and bridging social capital do not significantly predict responses to favor requests.
- Besmer, A., Lipford, H. R., Shehab, M. and Cheek, G. Social applications: exploring a more secure framework Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, ACM, Mountain View, California, 2009, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bosworth, A. News feed is a robot Facebook Blog, 2007.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. in Richardson, J. G. ed. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education Greenwood, New York, 1986, 241--258.Google Scholar
- Burke, M., Joyce, E., Kim, T., Anand, V. and Kraut, R. Introductions and requests: Rhetorical strategies that elicit response in online communities. Third International Conference on Communities and Technologies., 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burke, M., Kraut, R. and Marlow, C., Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. in CHI, (Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011), New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke, M., Marlow, C. and Lento, T., Social network activity and social well-being. in 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (Atlanta, 2010), New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burt, R. S. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94. 95--120.Google Scholar
- Donath, J. S. Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. 231--251.Google Scholar
- Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. Connection Strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society.Google Scholar
- Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Gray, R., Lampe, C. and Brooks, B. Cultivating Social Resources on Facebook: Signals of Relational Investment and their Role in Social Capital Processes iCS-OII 2011 "A Decade in Internet Time" Symposium. Oxford, UK, 2011.Google Scholar
- Ferlander, S. The importance of different forms of social capital for health. Acta Sociologica, 50 (2). 115--128.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kobayashi, T. Bridging social capital in online communities: Heterogeneity and social tolerance of online game players in Japan. Human Communication Research, 36 (4). 546--569.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C., A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network. in ACM CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2007), New York: ACM, 435--444. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lampe, C., Vitak, J., Gray, R. and Ellison, N., Perceptions of Facebook's Value as an Information Source in 30th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Austin, TX, 2012), ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin, N., Cook, K. S. and Burt, R. S. Social capital : theory and research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
- Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., Rashid, A. M., Resnick, P. and Kraut, R. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (4).Google Scholar
- Morris, M. R., Teevan, J. and Panovich, K., What do people ask their social networks, and why? A survey study of status message Q&A behavior. in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, (Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010), ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Panciera, K., Priedhorsky, R., Erickson, T. and Terveen, L. Lurking? cyclopaths?: a quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Papacharissi, Z. and Mendelson, A. Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. in Papathanassopoulos, S. ed. Media perspectives for the 21st century, Routledge, New Tork, 2011, 212--230.Google Scholar
- Portes, A. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22. 124.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
- Resnick, P. Beyond bowling together: Socio-technical capital. in Carroll, J. ed. HCI in the new millennium, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, 2001, 647--672. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C. and Wohn, D. Y. Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (6). 2322--2329. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefanone, M. A., Kwon, K. H. and Lackaff, D. Exploring the relationship between perceptions of social capital and enacted support online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B. and Lampe, C., Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. in Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, (2009), New York: ACM, 245--254. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B. and Lampe, C. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29. 434--445.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics. Allyn and Bacon, New York, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teevan, J., Morris, M. R. and Panovich, K. Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions asked via Social Network Status Messages. ICWSM, 2011.Google Scholar
- Trochim, W. The research methods knowledge base. Cornell University Press, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
- Valenzuela, S., Park, N. and Kee, K. Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14. 875--901.Google Scholar
- Williams, D. The impact of time online: Social capital and cyberbalkanization. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10 (3). 398--406.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Williams, D. On and off the 'Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11. 593--628.Google Scholar
- Yang, Z. L., and Peterson, R. T. Customer Perceived Value, Satisfaction, and Loyalty: The Role of Switching Costs, Psychology and Marketing, 21(10). 799--822.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Favors from facebook friends: unpacking dimensions of social capital
Recommendations
Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThough social network site use is often treated as a monolithic activity, in which all time is equally social and its impact the same for all users, we examine how Facebook affects social capital depending upon: (1) types of site activities, contrasting ...
Identifying social capital in the facebook interface
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA number of studies have identified a robust relationship between the use of social network sites, particularly Facebook, and positive outcomes such as social capital. Social network site use is often measured as a function of use frequency, network ...
Building social capital with Facebook: Type of network, availability of other media, and social self-efficacy matter#
Highlights- Type of friends affects building social capital via Facebook and traditional media.
AbstractFindings about Facebook's effect on relationships are mixed, possibly due to lack of models that acknowledge differences across users, types of their friends, and use of competing media. To address this, we proposed and tested how ...
Comments