skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466153acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Everyday activities and energy consumption: how families understand the relationship

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Energy consumption is a growing concern and it is important to inform families of their consumption and how they might reduce it. We conducted an interview study that focuses on the existing routines of families and how they currently understand their power and gas consumption based on standard utility bills. We also investigated how this understanding ties to their everyday activities as might be recorded on their calendars. This allowed us to assess calendars as an artifact for energy consumption awareness. Our results show that many people relate changes in energy consumption to high-level effects such as weather and temperature and not necessarily their own everyday activities. Events on calendars may aid this understanding but people do not currently record enough information on their calendars to make a strong tie. This suggests that if calendars are to be used as artifacts to aid energy consumption understanding, digital calendars need to provide support to include more energy-related information, including both activities and patterns of consumption.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Rothengatter, T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), (2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bartram, L., Rodgers, J., and Woodbury, R. Smart Homes or Smart Occupants? Supporting Aware Living in the Home, Proc. INTERACT, IFIP (2011), 52--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bartram, L., Rodgers, J., Muise, K. Chasing the negawatt: visualization for Sustainable Living, IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 30(3), 8--14 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chetty, M., Bernheim Brush, A. J., Meyers, B. R., Johns, P., It's Not Easy Being Green: Understanding Home Computer Power Management, Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2009), 1033--1042. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chetty, M., Tran, D., and Grinter, R. Getting to Green: Understanding Resource Consumption in the Home, Proc. Ubicomp, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Desjardins, A. and Wakkary, R., How Children Represent Sustainability in the Home, Proc. IDC, ACM Press (2011), 37--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fisher, C., Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1): 79--104, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., and Landay, J. The Design of Eco-Feedback Technology, Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Froehlich, J., Larson, E., Campbell, T., Haggerty, C., Fogarty, J., and Patel, S. HydroSense: Infrastruture-Mediated Single-Point Sensing of Whole-Home Water Activity, Proc. Ubicomp, ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Ostergren, M., Ramanathan, S., Peterson, J., Wragg, I., Larson, E., Fu, F., Bai, M., Patel, S., and Landay, J., The Design and Evaluation of Prototype Eco-Feedback Displays for Fixture-Level Water Usage Data, Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gustafasson, A. and Gyllensward, The Power-Aware Cord: Energy Awareness through Ambient Information Display, Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. He, H., Greenberg, S., and Huang, E. One Size Does Not Fit All: Applying the Transtheoretical Model to Energy Feedback Technology Design, Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2010), 927--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Holmes, T. Eco-Visualization: Combining Art and Technology to Reduce Energy Consumption, Proc. Creativity & Cognition, ACM Press (2007), 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kempton, W., and Layne, L. The consumer's energy analysis environment, Energy Policy, 22(10), (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, Y., Schmid, T., Charbiwala, Z., Srivastava, M. B. ViridiScope: Design and Implementation of a Fine-Grained Power Monitoring System for Homes, Proc. Ubicomp, ACM Press (2009), 245--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kincaid, C., Dupont, P., and Kaye, A. R., Electronic calendars in the office. ACM Transactions on Offices, ACM Press (1985), 89--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kelley, J. F. and Chapanis, A., How professional persons keep their calendars: Implications for computerization. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 55, (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M., Paay, J., and Pathmanathan, R., Using Mobile Phones to Support Sustainability: A Field Study of Residential Electricity Consumption, Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2012), 2347--2356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mankoff, J., Matthews, D., Fussell, S. R., Johnson Leveraging Social Networks to Motivate Individuals to Reduce their Ecological Footprints, Proc. HICSS, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Neustaedter, C., Domestic Awareness and the Role of Family Calendars, PhD Dissertation, University of Calgary, Canada, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Neustaedter, C. and Brush, A. J., "LINC-ing" the Family: The Participatory Design of an Inkable Family Calendar, Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2006), 141--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A. J., and Greenberg, S. A Digital Family Calendar in the Home: Lessons from Field Trials of LINC, Proc. Graphics Interface, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A. J., and Greenberg, S. The Calendar is Crucial: Coordination and Awareness through the Family Calendar, ToCHI, 16(1), ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Payne, S. J. Understanding Calendar Use, Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 8(2), 83--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Petersen, J. E., Shunturov, V., Janda, K., Platt, G., Weinberger, K. Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(1), 16--33 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Pierce, J., Odom, W., and Blevis, E. Energy Aware Dwelling: A Critical Survey of Interaction Design for Eco-Visualizations, Proc. OzCHI, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Plaisant, C., Bederson, B., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H., and Druin, A. Shared Family Calendars: Promoting Symmetry and Accessibility, ToCHI, 13(3), ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Riche, Y., Dodge, J., and Metoyer, R. Studying Always-On Electricity Feedback in the Home, Proc. CHI, ACM Press (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rodgers, J. and Bartram, L. Exploring Ambient and Artistic Visualization for Residential Energy Use Feedback, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17 (12), 2489--2497, (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition, Sage Publications (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Vale, B., & Vale, R. (2010). Domestic energy use, lifestyles and POE: past lessons for current problems. Building Research & Information, 38 (5), 578--588.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wegner, D., Raymond, P., and Erber, R. Transactive Memory in Close Relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 6, (1991), 923--929.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Woods, G., Newborough, M. Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes: Enabling energy conservation with central and local displays, Energy and Buildings, 39, 495--503 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Steg, L. Promoting Household Energy Conservation. Energy Policy, 36, 4449--4453. Elsevier (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Weiss, M., Mattern, F., Graml, T., Staake, T., Fleisch, E., Handy Feedback: Connecting Smart Meters with Mobile Phones, Proc. Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Article No. 15., ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Everyday activities and energy consumption: how families understand the relationship

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader