skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441860acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding how the projection of availability state impacts the reception incoming communication

Published:23 February 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many communication systems infer and project information about a user's availability, making it possible for others to decide whether and how to contact that user. Presumably when the system infers people are busy, they are less open to interruption. But analysis of 103,962 phone calls made using a popular enterprise communications tool reveals that people are actually significantly more likely to answer the phone when the system projects that they are busy than at other times. A follow-up survey of 569 users of the system suggests that this seemingly counter-intuitive fact may arise because people care a lot about the recipient's availability when initiating phone communications and are unlikely to attempt to call someone who appears to be busy unless the communication is important. Recipients thus perceive incoming calls as more important when they are busy than at other times, making them more likely to answer.

References

  1. Avrahami, D., D. Gergle, S. E. Hudson and S. B. Kiesler. Improving the match between callers and receivers: A study on the effect of contextual information on cell phone interruptions. Journal of Behaviour & Information Technology, 2007:26(3), 247--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Begole, J., N. E. Matsakis and J. C. Tang. Lilsys: Sensing unavailability. In Proceedings of CSCW 2004, 511--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bogunovich, P. and D. Salvucci. The effects of time constraints on user behavior for deferrable interruptions. In Proceedings of CHI 2011, 3123--3126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Czerwinski, M., E. Cutrell and E. Horvitz. Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. In Proceedings of OZCHI 2000, 356--361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dabbish, L. and R. E. Kraut. Controlling interruptions: Awareness displays and social motivation for coordination. In Proceedings of CSCW 2004, 511--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. De Guzman, E. S., M. Sharmin and B. P. Bailey. Should I call now? Understanding what context is considered when deciding whether to initiate remote communication via mobile devices. In Proceedings of GI 2007, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dumais, S. T., R. Jeffries, D. M. Russell, D. Tang and J. Teevan. Designing and analyzing large scale logs studies. Course at CHI 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogarty, J., S. E. Hudson, C. G. Atkeson, D. Avrahami, J. Forlizzi, S. B. Kiesler, J. Lee and J. Yang. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors. TOCHI, 2005:12(1), 119--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fogarty, J., J. Lai and J. Christensen. Presence versus availability: The design & evaluation of a context-aware communication client. IJHCS, 2004:61(3), 299--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Grandhi, S. A., R. P. Schuler and Q. Jones. Telling Calls: Facilitating phone conversation grounding and management. In Proceedings of CHI 2011, 2153--2162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Grimes, C., D. Tang and D. M. Russell. Query logs alone are not enough. WWW 2007 workshop on Query Log Analysis: Social and Technological Challenges.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Iqbal, S. T. and B. P. Bailey. Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks. In Proceedings of CHI 2008, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nardi, B. A., S. Whittaker and E. Bradner. Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of CSCW 2002, 78--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Oulasvista, A., R. Petit, M. Raento and S. Titta. Interpreting and acting on mobile awareness cutes. HCI, 2007:22(1), 97--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wiberg M. and S. Whittaker. Managing availability: Supporting lightweight negotiations to handle interruptions. TOCHI, 2005:12(4), 356--387. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding how the projection of availability state impacts the reception incoming communication

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2013
      1594 pages
      ISBN:9781450313315
      DOI:10.1145/2441776

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 February 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader