skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2398723acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

4Is of social bully filtering: identity, inference, influence, and intervention

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the increasing of popularity of social web, cyber bullying has become a more and more serious issue among children. Bullying causes huge negative effects on children, even suicide. SocialFilter is a realtime system that helps parents and educators track children's messages on Twitter, especially in order to detect whether they have been bullied or bullying others. The aim of the system is 4 I's, identity of bullies, inference of bullying message, influence of bully behavior, and intervention. We solve this problem by using machine learning technique. The current system is tracking tens of thousands of active children users on Twitter and automatically detect bullying messages at real time.

References

  1. K. Bjorkqvist. Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Bowers, P. Smith, and V. Binney. Perceived family relationships of bullies, victims and bully/victims in middle childhood. J Soc Pers Relat, 11:215--232, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. bullyingstatistics.org. Cyber bullying statistics. http://www.bullyingstatistics.org/content/cyber-bullying-statistics.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Goldbaum, W. Craig, D. Pepler, and J. C. J. Developmental trajectories of victimization: Identifying risk and protective factors. Zins, J. E., Elias, M. J., Maher, C. A., eds. Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention, pages 143--60, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. irkmlab.soe.ucsc.edu. Happytweets. http://santacruz.soe.ucsc.edu/filtering/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. M. J. Lagerspetz, K. Bjorkqvist, and T. Peltonen. Is indirect aggression typical of females? gender diffeiences in aggressiveness in 11-l2-year-old children. Agtessive Behavior, 14:303--315, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T. Nansel, M. O. M, and R. Pilla. Bullying behaviors among us youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. J Am Med Assoc, 285, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Pennebaker, C. Chung, and M. Ireland. The development and psychometric properties of liwc2007. LIWC Manual, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. stopbullying.gov. Cyber bullying. http://www.stopbullying.gov/topics/cyberbullying/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Telegraph. Cyberbullying is a new threat for children. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/education/educationadvice/8593880/Cyberbullying-is-a-new-threat-for-children.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Wang, T. R. Nansel, and R. J. Iannotti. School bullying among adolescents in the united states: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4):368--375, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Li and C. J. C. Burges. Learning to rank using classification and gradient boosting. NIPS 06, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 4Is of social bully filtering: identity, inference, influence, and intervention

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader