skip to main content
10.1145/2370216.2370230acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recognizing water-based activities in the home through infrastructure-mediated sensing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Activity recognition in the home has been long recognized as the foundation for many desirable applications in fields such as home automation, sustainability, and healthcare. However, building a practical home activity monitoring system remains a challenge. Striking a balance between cost, privacy, ease of installation and scalability continues to be an elusive goal. In this paper, we explore infrastructure-mediated sensing combined with a vector space model learning approach as the basis of an activity recognition system for the home. We examine the performance of our single-sensor water-based system in recognizing eleven high-level activities in the kitchen and bathroom, such as cooking and shaving. Results from two studies show that our system can estimate activities with overall accuracy of 82.69% for one individual and 70.11% for a group of 23 participants. As far as we know, our work is the first to employ infrastructure-mediated sensing for inferring high-level human activities in a home setting.

References

  1. L. Atallah and G. Yang. The use of pervasive sensing for behaviour profiling --- a survey. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, (5):447--464, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Cohn, S. Gupta, J. Froehlich, E. Larson, and S. Patel. GasSense: Appliance-level, single-point sensing of gas activity in the home. Pervasive Computing, pages 265--282, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Fogarty, C. Au, and S. E. Hudson. Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. In UIST '06: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM Request Permissions, Oct. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Froehlich, E. Larson, T. Campbell, C. Haggerty, J. Fogarty, and S. Patel. HydroSense: infrastructure-mediated single-point sensing of whole-home water activity. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, pages 235--244, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Froehlich, E. Larson, E. Saba, T. Campbell, L. Atlas, J. Fogarty, and S. Patel. A Longitudinal Study of Pressure Sensing to Infer Real-World Water Usage Events in the Home. Pervasive Computing, pages 50--69, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Gupta, M. Reynolds, and S. Patel. ElectriSense: single-point sensing using EMI for electrical event detection and classification in the home. Ubicomp '10: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing, Sept. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Hamid, S. Maddi, A. Johnson, A. Bobick, I. Essa, and C. Isbell. A novel sequence representation for unsupervised analysis of human activities. Artificial Intell., 173:1221--44, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. Hirsch, J. Forlizzi, E. Hyder, J. Goetz, C. Kurtz, and J. Stroback. The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability, pages 72--79, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. S. Intille, K. Larson, E. M. Mungia-Tapia, J. S. Beaudin, P. Kaushik, J. Nawyn, and R. Rockinson. Using a live-in laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing, pages 349--365, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. A. Ivanov and A. F. Bobick. Recognition of visual activities and interactions by stochastic parsing. PAMI, 22(2):852--872, August 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Katz, A. B. Ford, R. W. Moskowitz, B. A. Jackson, and M. W. Jaffe. Studies of illness in the aged. Jama The Journal Of The American Medical Association, 185(12):914--919, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Kientz, S. Patel, B. Jones, E. Price, E. D. Mynatt, and G. D. Abowd. The Georgia Tech aware home. In Proc. CHI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Kranz, A. Schmidt, A. Maldonado, and R. B. Rusu. Context-aware kitchen utilities. In Proc. Int. Conf. Tangible and Embedded Interaction, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Larson and M. Csikszentmihalyi. Experience sampling method (esm). In H T Reis Ed Naturalistic Approaches to Studying Social Interaction New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 15:41--56, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. P. Lawton and E. M. Brody. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9(3):179--186, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. D. Moore and I. Essa. Recognizing multitasked activities from video using stochastic context-free grammar. In AAAI, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. E. Munguia-Tapia, S. Intille, and K. Larson. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. Proceedings of PERVASIVE, pages 158--186, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Patel, M. Reynolds, and G. Abowd. Detecting Human Movement by Differential Air Pressure Sensing in HVAC System Ductwork: An Exploration in Infrastructure Mediated Sensing. Pervasive '08: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Mar. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Pham and P. Olivier. Slice & Dice: Recognizing Food Preparation Activities Using Embedded Accelerometers. In Proc. Europ. Conf. Ambient Intelligence, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Philipose, K. Fishkin, M. Perkowitz, D. Patterson, D. Fox, H. Kautz, and D. Hahnel. Inferring activities from interactions with objects. IEEE pervasive computing, 3(4):50--57, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Salton. The SMART retrieval system: Experiments in automatic document processing. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Turaga, R. Chellappa, V. S. Subrahmanian, and O. Udrea. Machine recognition of human activities: A survey. IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems for Video Tech., 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. H. Wang, M. M. Ullah, A. Kläser, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid. Evaluation of local spatio-temporal features for action recognition. In BMVC, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Recognizing water-based activities in the home through infrastructure-mediated sensing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader