skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2318073acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bodily experience and imagination: designing ritual interactions for participatory live-art contexts

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We are exploring new possibilities for bodily-focused aesthetic experiences within participatory live-art contexts. As artist-researchers, we are interested in how we can understand and shape bodily experience and imagination as primary components of an interactive aesthetic experience, sonically mediated by digital biofeedback technologies. Through the making of a participatory live-art installation, we illustrate how we used the Bodyweather performance methodology to inform the design of ritual interactions intended to reframe the audience experience of self, body and the world through imaginative processes of scaling and metaphor. We report on the insights into the varieties of audience experience gathered from audience testing of the prototype artwork, with a particular focus on the relationship between the embodied imagination and felt sensation; the influence of objects and costume; and the sonically mediated experience of physiological processes of breathing and heartbeat. We offer some reflections on the use of ritual and scripted interactions as a strategy for facilitating coherent forms of bodily experience.

References

  1. Bilda Z., Costello B. and Amitani S. Collaborative analysis framework for evaluating interactive art experience. Journal of CoDesign 2, 4, Taylor and Francis (2006), 225--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, C. (Ed.) Participation. Whitechapel Gallery, MIT Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Borja-Villel, M. (Ed.) Lygia Clark. Fundació Antoni Tapies, Barcelona, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brett, G. Lygia Clark: In search of the body. Art in America, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies, C. Osmose {Online}. Immersence. 2006. Available: http://www.immersence.com/{Accessed June 12th 2006}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. Art as Experience. Capricorn Books, 1934.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dissanayake, E. What Is Art For? University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmonds, E. The art of interaction. Digital Creativity 21, 4 (2010), 257--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Goffman, E. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-To-Face Behavior. Aldine Pub. Co., Chicago, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanna, T. Somatics. Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, L. K. and Kozel, S. Embodied imagination: A hybrid method of designing for intimacy. Digital Creativity 18, 4 (2007), 207--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Höök, K., Sengers, P. and Andersson, G. Sense and sensibility: Evaluation and interactive art. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM (2003), New York, USA, 241--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Khut, G. Interactive art as embodied enquiry: Working with audience experience. In Edmonds, E., Muller, L. & Turnbull, D. (Eds.) Engage: Interaction, Arts & Audience Experience, Creativity and Cognition Studios Press (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Khut, G. and Muller, L. Evolving creative practice: A reflection on working with audience experience in Cardiomorphologies. In Anastasiuo, P., Smithies, R., Trist, K. & Jones, L. (Eds.) Vital Signs: Creative Practice & New Media Now, RMIT Publishing (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kozel, S. Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Leonardo, The MIT Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Latulipe, C., Carroll, E. A. and Lottridge, D. Love, Hate, Arousal and Engagement: Exploring Audience Responses to Performing Arts. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Loke, L. and Khut, G. P. Surging Verticality: An experience of balance. In Proc. TEI '11, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 237--240 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. McAuley, G. (Ed.) About Performance 5 (2003), Department of Performance Studies, University of Sydney, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Muller, L., Edmonds, E. and Connell, M. Living laboratories for interactive art. Journal of CoDesign 2, 4 (2006), Taylor and Francis, UK, 195--207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. O'Reilly, S. The Body in Contemporary Art. Thames & Hudson, London, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Osthoff, S. Lygia Clark and Hélio Oiticica: A legacy of interactivity and participation for a telematic future. Leonardo 30 (1997), 279--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rokeby, D. Transforming Mirrors: Subjectivity and control in interactive media. In Penny, S. (Ed.) Critical Issues in Electronic Media (1995), State University of New York, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rosenboom, D. A Description of Vancouver Piece. In Rosenboom, D. (Ed.) Biofeedback and the Arts: Results of Early Experiments, Aesthetic Research Centre of Canada, Vancouver, BC (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Schechner, R. Performance Theory. Routledge Classics, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Schiphorst, T. and Andersen, K. Between bodies: Using experience modeling to create gestural protocols for physiological data transfer. In Proc. CHI 2004 Fringe, ACM Press (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Schiphorst, T. Self-evidence: Applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. In Proc. CHI EA '11, ACM (2011), New York, NY, USA, 145--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shusterman, R. Performing Live: Aesthetic Alternatives for the Ends of Art. Cornell University Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Snow, P. P4: Performance making in Alice. In McAuley, G. (Ed.), About Performance 5 (2003), Department of Performance Studies, University of Sydney, Australia, 49--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Turner, V. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. PAJ Publications (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Winkler, T. Participation and response in movement-sensing installations. In Proc. 2000 International Computer Music Conference, International Computer Music Association (2000), 137--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Bodily experience and imagination: designing ritual interactions for participatory live-art contexts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2012
      828 pages
      ISBN:9781450312103
      DOI:10.1145/2317956

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader