skip to main content
10.1145/2110363.2110465acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Using SNOMED semantic concept groupings to enhance semantic-type assignment consistency in the UMLS

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 January 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

SNOMED concepts make up a significant percentage of the UMLS Metathesaurus. Hence, the correctness of their semantic type (ST) assignments contributes significantly to the overall correctness of ST assignments throughout the UMLS. Two kinds of semantic concept groupings within SNOMED are employed to automatically check for potentially inconsistent ST assignments, based on their collective sets of assignments. The first kind of concept grouping, called a semantic uniformity group (SUG), is based on concepts' properties and hierarchical configurations. The second kind constitutes intersections of groupings of the first kind ("overlapping SUG" (OSUG)). The methodology is applied to SNOMED's Specimen hierarchy, where 448 concepts residing in 40 SUGs are analyzed. A hypothesis concerning the fact that OSUGs can be stronger indicators of inconsistencies than SUGs is considered. The results show that our methodology can be effective in finding ST assignment problems and thus can augment the suite of techniques available for managing the enormous amount of such assignments.

References

  1. IHTSDO: SNOMED CT, available at http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct. Accessed September 16, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) - Home, available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls. Accessed September 16, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fung, K. W., Hole, W. T., Nelson, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Powell, T., and Roth, L. Integrating SNOMED CT into the UMLS: an exploration of different views of synonymy and quality of editing. JAMIA. 2005;12(4):486--494.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodenreider, O. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32(DATABASE ISS.):D267--D70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., Gu, H., Perl, Y., Halper, M., and Xu, J. Expanding the extent of a UMLS semantic type via group neighborhood auditing. JAMIA. 2009;16(5):746--757.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Y., Gu, H., Perl, Y., Geller, J., and Halper, M. Structural group auditing of a UMLS semantic type's extent. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2009;42(1):41--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Schulz, S., Beisswanger, E., van den Hoek, L., Bodenreider, O., and van Mulligen, E. M. Alignment of the UMLS semantic network with BioTop: methodology and assessment. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(12):i69--i76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fan, J. W. and Friedman, C. Semantic classification of biomedical concepts using distributional similarity. JAMIA. 2007;14(4):467--477.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Humphreys, B. L., McCray, A. T., and Cheh, M. L. Evaluating the coverage of controlled health data terminologies: report on the results of the NLM/AHCPR large scale vocabulary test. JAMIA. 1997;4(6):484--500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mougin, F., Bodenreider, O., and Burgun, A.. Analyzing polysemous concepts from a clinical perspective: application to auditing concept categorization in the UMLS. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2009;42(3):440--451. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cimino, J. J. Auditing the Unified Medical Language System with semantic methods. JAMIA. 1998;5(1):41--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang, Y., Halper, M., Min, H., Perl, Y., Chen, Y., and Spackman, K. A. Structural methodologies for auditing SNOMED. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2007;40(5):561--581.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, Y., Wei, D., Xu, J., et al. Auditing complex concepts in overlapping subsets of SNOMED. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008: p. 273--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wei, D., Halper, M., Elhanan, G., et al. Auditing SNOMED relationships using a converse abstraction network. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009: p. 685--689.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Morrey, C. P., Geller, J., Halper, M., and Perl, Y. The Neighborhood Auditing Tool: a hybrid interface for auditing the UMLS. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2009;42(3):468--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. The UMLS Semantic Network. http://semanticnetwork.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed September 16, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gu, H., Perl, Y., Elhanan, G., Min, H., Zhang, L., and Peng, Y. Auditing concept categorizations in the UMLS. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2004 May; 31(1):29--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Bodenreider, O. Strength in numbers: exploring redundancy in hierarchical relations across biomedical terminologies. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003: p. 101--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhu, X., Fan, J.-W., Baorto, D. M., Weng, C., and Cimino, J. J. A review of auditing methods applied to the content of controlled biomedical terminologies. 2009;42(3):413--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Zhang, G.-Q. and Bodenreider, O. Large-scale, exhaustive lattice-based structural auditing of SNOMED CT. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010: p. 922--926.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using SNOMED semantic concept groupings to enhance semantic-type assignment consistency in the UMLS

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IHI '12: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium
      January 2012
      914 pages
      ISBN:9781450307819
      DOI:10.1145/2110363

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 January 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader