skip to main content
10.1145/2070481.2070545acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Child-robot interaction in the wild: advice to the aspiring experimenter

Published:14 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present insights gleaned from a series of child-robot interaction experiments carried out in a hospital paediatric department. Our aim here is to share good practice in experimental design and lessons learned about the implementation of systems for social HRI with child users towards application in "the wild", rather than in tightly controlled and constrained laboratory environments: a trade-off between the structures imposed by experimental design and the desire for removal of such constraints that inhibit interaction depth, and hence engagement, requires a careful balance.

References

  1. %Physical Education, The National Curriculum for England.% http://curriculum.qcda.gov.uk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Baxter, T. Belpaeme, L. Canamero, P. Cosi, Y. Demiris, V. Enescu, A. Hiolle, I. Kruijff-Korbayova, R. Looije, M. Nalin, M. Neerincx, G. Sommavilla, F. Tesser, and R. Wood. Long-Term Human-Robot Interaction with Young Users. In IEEE/ACM Human-Robot Interaction 2011 Conference (Robots with Children Workshop), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Baxter, R. Wood, T. Belpaeme, and M. Nalin. On memory systems for companion robots: Implementation methodologies and legal implications. In AISB Symposium on Human Memory for Artificial Agents. AISB, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. %H. Cuayahuitl and I. Kruijff-Korbayova. Towards Learning Human-Robot Dialogue Policies Combining Speech and Visual Beliefs. In To appear in proceedings of the Workshop on Paralinguistic Information and its Integration in Spoken Dialogue Systems, Granada, Spain, Sep 2011., 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Huizinga. Homo Ludens. Beacon Press, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Kanda, R. Sato, N. Saiwaki, and H. Ishiguro. A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics (Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction), 23(5):962--971, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Looije, M. Neerincx, and V. de Lange. Children's responses and opinion on three bots that motivate, educate and play. Journal of Physical Agents, 2(2):13--20, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. P. Michalowski, R. Simmons, and H. Kozima. Rhythmic attention in child-robot dance play. In 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 816--821, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Nalin, L. Bergamini, A. Giusti, I. Baroni, and A. Sanna. Children's perception of a robotic companion in a mildly constrained setting. In IEEE/ACM Human-Robot Interaction 2011 Conference (Robots with% Children Workshop) Proceedings, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Okely and J. Wright. The gender bias in fundamental motor skills tests - a new agenda% needed! In Proceeding of AARE International Education Research Conference, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. T. Boekhorst, and A. Billard. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2):105--120, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Rollnick, W. Miller, and C. Butler. Motivational interviewing in health care: helping patients change behavior. The Guilford Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Ros, Y. Demiris, I. Baroni, and M. Nalin. Adapting Robot Behavior to User's Capabilities: a Dance Instruction Study. In HRI (Human-Robot Interaction) Conference 2011, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I. E. V. Rossberg-Gempton, J. Dickinson, and G. Poole. Creative dance: Potentiality for enhancing social functioning in frail seniors and young children. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 26:313--327, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. T. Salter, I. Werry, and F. Michaud. Going into the wild with child-robot interaction studies. Intelligent Service Robots, 1(2):93--108, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. Shinozaki, Y. Oda, S. Tsuda, R. Nakatsu, and A. Iwatani. Study of dance entertainment using robots. In Z. P. et al. et al., editor, Edutainment, volume 3942 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 473--483. Springer-Verlag% Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. F. Tanaka, A. Cicourel, and J. Movellan. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood% education center. PNAS, 104(46):17954--17958, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. F. Tanaka, J. R. Movellan, B. Fortenberry, and K. Aisaka. Daily hri evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on% Human-robot interaction, pages 3--9. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. Turkle, C. Breazeal, O. Dasté, and B. Scassellati. Encounters with Kismet and Cog : Children Respond to Relational Artifacts. In P. Messaris and L. Humphreys, editors, Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication, pages 1--20. Peter Lang Publishing, New York, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Child-robot interaction in the wild: advice to the aspiring experimenter

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              ICMI '11: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces
              November 2011
              432 pages
              ISBN:9781450306416
              DOI:10.1145/2070481

              Copyright © 2011 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 14 November 2011

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader