Wanda J. Orlikowski
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
In this article, we build on and extend research into the cognitions and values of users and designers by proposing a systematic approach for examining the underlying assumptions, expectations, and knowledge that people have about technology. Such interpretations of technology (which we call technological frames) are central to understanding technological development, use, and change in organizations. We suggest that where the technological frames of key groups in organizations—such as managers, technologists, and users— are significantly different, difficulties and conflict around the development, use, and change of technology may result. We use the findings of an empirical study to illustrate how the nature, value, and use of a groupware technology were interpreted by various organizational stakeholders, resulting in outcomes that deviated from those expected. We argue that technological frames offer an interesting and useful analytic perspective for explaining an anticipating actions and meanings that are not easily obtained with other theoretical lenses.
- ABELSON, R. P 1981. Psychological status of the script concept. Am. Psychol. 36, 7, 715-729.Google Scholar
- AGAR, M. H. 1980. The Professwnal Stranger: An In{brmal Introductzon to Ethnography. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- ARGYRIS, C. AND SCHON, D. 1978. Orgamzatwnal Learmng. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
- BARTLETT, F. 1932. Remembemng: A Study ~n Experimental and Soczal Psychology. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
- BARTUNEK. J. 1984 Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Adm. Scl. Q. 29, 3, 355-372.Google Scholar
- BARTUNEK, J. AND MOCH, M. 1987. First order, second order, and third order change and organization development interventions: A cogmtive approach. J. Appl. Behav. Sc~. 23, 4, 483-500.Google Scholar
- BERGER, P. L. AND LUCI~ANN, T. 1967. The Social Constructton of Reahty. Anchor Books, New York.Google Scholar
- B~R, W 1987. The social construction of Bakelite: Toward a theory of invention. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 159-187.Google Scholar
- BIJKER, W., HUCHES, T., AND P~NCH, T., EDS. 1987. The Soctal Construction of Technologzcal Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- BLOOMBERG, J.L. 1986. The variable ~mpact of computer technologies on the organization of work activitms. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperata,e Work. ACM, New York, 35-42. Google Scholar
- BOLAND, R. J., JR. 1979. Control, causality and information systems requirements, Account. Org. Soc. 4, 4, 259-272.Google Scholar
- BOLAND, R. J., JR. 1978. The process and product of system design. Manage. Sci. 24, 5, 887 898.Google Scholar
- BOLMAN, L. G. AND DEAL, T. E 1991. Reframtng Orgamzatwns: Arttstry, Choice, and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
- BOSTROM, R. P. AND HEINEN, J.S. 1977. MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective, Part I--The causes. MIS Q. 1, 3, 17-32.Google Scholar
- BOUGON, M., WEICK, K., AND BINKUORST, D. 1977. Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. Admtn. Sci. Q. 22, 4, 606 639.Google Scholar
- BURNS, T. AND STALKER, G.M. 1961. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
- CALDER, B. AND SCHURR, P. 1981. Attitudinal processes in organizations. Res. Org. Behav. 3, 283-302.Google Scholar
- CICOUREL, A. 1974. Cognitive Sociology. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
- DAFT, R. L. AND LENdEL, R.H. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage. Sci. 32, 5, 554-571. Google Scholar
- DAFT, R. L. AND WEICK, K.E. 1984. Towards a model of organizations as interpretive systems. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9, 2, 284 295.Google Scholar
- DAGWELL, R. AND WEBER, R. 1983. Systems designers' user models: A comparative study and methodological critique. Commun. ACM 26, 11, 987-997, Google Scholar
- DEJE~, D. AND DBJE~, S.B. 1991. Lotus Notes at Work. Lotus Books, New York.Google Scholar
- DIMAGG~O, P. J. ANn POWELL, W. W. 1991. Introduction. In The New Inst~tutional~sm in Organizatwnal Analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1-34.Google Scholar
- DORNBUSCH, S. M. AND SCOTT, W.R. 1975. Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority. Jossey- Bass, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
- OUGHERTY, D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Org. Sci. 3, 2, 179-202.Google Scholar
- DOUGLAS, M. 1987. How Institutions Think. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
- DUTTON, J. E. AND JACKSON, S.E. 1987. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational actions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 12, 1, 76-90.Google Scholar
- EISENHARDT, K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14, 4, 532-550.Google Scholar
- EDEN, C. 1992. On the nature of cognitive maps. J. Manage. Stud. 29, 3, 261-265.Google Scholar
- FINNEY, M. AND MITROFF, I.I. 1986. Strategic plan failures: The organization as its own worst enemy. In The Thinking Organization. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 317-335.Google Scholar
- GASH, D.C. 1987. The effects of microcomputers on organizational roles and the distribution of power. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
- GASH, D. C. ~3~ ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. 1991. Changing frames: Towards an understanding of information technology and organizational change. In Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 51st Annual Meeting. Academy of Management, 189-193.Google Scholar
- GEERTZ, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- GIDDENS, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
- GIO~A, D.A. 1986. Symbols, scripts, and sensemaking: Creating meaning in the organizational experience. In The Th~nking Organization. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 49 74.Google Scholar
- GIoIA, D. A. AND SIMS, H. R., JR. 1986. Introduction: Social cognition in organizations. In The Thinking Organization. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., i 19.Google Scholar
- GINZBERG, M.J. 1981. Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions. Manage. Sci. 27, 4, 459-478.Google Scholar
- GOFFMAN, I. 1974. Frame Analysis. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
- GOODMAN, P., GmFFITH, T. L. AND FENNER, B. 1990. Understanding technology and the individual in an organizational context. In Technology and Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 45 86.Google Scholar
- GRAY, B., BOUGON, M., AND DONNELLON, A. 1985. Organizations as constructions and destructions of meaning. J. Manage. 11, 1, 83-95.Google Scholar
- GREENWOOD, R. AND HININGS, C.R. 1988. Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Org. Stud. 9, 3, 293-316.Google Scholar
- GREGORY, K. L. 1983. Native-View Paradigms: Multiple cultures and culture conflicts in organizations. Adm~n. Sc~. Q. 28, 3, 359-376.Google Scholar
- GRUDIN, J. 1988. Why gToupware applications fail: Problems in design and evaluation. Off. Tech. People 4, 3, 245-264.Google Scholar
- HEDBERG, B., NYSTROM, P., AND STARRUCK, W. 1977. Designing organizations to match tomorrow. TIMS Stud. Manage. Sci. 5, 2, 171-181.Google Scholar
- HEDBERG, B., NYSTROM, P., AND STARBUCK, W. 1976. Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Admin. Sci. Q. 21, 1, 41-65.Google Scholar
- ENDERSON, K. 1991. Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Scz. Tech. Hum. Val. 16, 4, 448-473.Google Scholar
- HIRSCHHEIM, R. A. AND KLEIN, H.K. 1989. Four paradigms of information systems development. Commun. ACM 32, 10, 1199 1216. Google Scholar
- ISABELLA, L.A. 1990. Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Acad. Manage J. 33, L 7 41.Google Scholar
- KIESLER, S. AND ~PROULL, L. 1982. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Admin. Sct. Q. 27, 4, 548-570.Google Scholar
- KLING, R. AND GERSON, E. 1978 Patterns of segmentations and intersections in the computing world. Symb. Interaction 1, 1, 24 43.Google Scholar
- KLING, R. AND IACONO, S. 1989. The institutional character of computerized information systems. Off. Tech. People 5, 1, 7-28.Google Scholar
- KLING, R. AND IACONO, S. 1984. Computing as an occasion for social control J. Soc. Iss. 40, 77-96Google Scholar
- KRUEGER, R.A. 1988. Focus Groups: A Practzcal Guide for Apphed Research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.Google Scholar
- KUHN, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientzflc Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
- KUMAR, K. AND B,JORN-ANDERSEN, N. 1990 A cross-cultural comparison of IS designer values. Commun. ACM 33, 5, 528 538. Google Scholar
- LAWRENCE, P. R. AND LORSCH, J.W. 1967. Organlzatlon and Envtronment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- Lores, M. R. AND SUTTON, R.I. 1991. Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking Hum. Rel. 44, 1, 55-76.Google Scholar
- MARCH, J. G. AND SIMON, H. 1958. Organizations. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- MARKUS, M.L. 1984. Systems m Organtzatlons: Bugs and Features. Pitman, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
- MARKUS, M.L. 1983. Power, politics and MIS implementation. Commun. ACM26, 6, 430 444. Google Scholar
- MARKUS, M. L. AND BJORN-ANDERSEN, N. 1987. Power over users: Its exercise by system professionals Cornmun. ACM 30, 6, 498-504. Google Scholar
- MARk:US, M, L. AND ROBE~, D. 1988. Infornmtion technology and organizational change. Causal structure in theory and research Manage. Scz. 34, 5~ 583 598. Google Scholar
- MARSHAK, D.S. 1990. Lotus Notes' A platform for developing workgroup applications. Patmcia Seybold's Of/: Comput. Rep. 13, 7.Google Scholar
- MILES, M. B. AND HUBERMAN, A. M. 1984. Qual~tatwe Data Analys~s: A Sourcebook of New Methods, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.Google Scholar
- MOTH, M. AND BARTUNEr:, J. 1990. Creating Alternatwe Reahtles at Work: The Quality of Work Lzfe Experiment at Food Corn. Harper Business, New York.Google Scholar
- NEISSER, U. 1976. Cognztion and Reality: Prmmples and Irnphcatmns of Cognztzve Psychology W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
- NOBLE, D. 1986. Forces of Production: A Soczal History of Industrial Automatmn. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- ODELL, L., Gosw^lm, D., AND HERRINC~TON, A. 1983. The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings. In Research on Writing: Princzples and Methods Longman, New York, 220 236.Google Scholar
- ORLmOWSKh W.J. 1992a. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology, in organizations. O1w. Sci. 3, 3, 398-427.Google Scholar
- ORHt~OWSKL W.J. 1992b. Learning from notes. Organizational issues in g~,oupware implementation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, 362-369 Google Scholar
- ORLIKOWSKI, W.J. 1988. The data processing occupation: Professionalization or proletarianization. Res. Soc. Work 4, 95-124.Google Scholar
- ORLIKOWSKL W. J. AND GASH, I). C. 1991. Changing frames: Understanding technological change in organizations. Working Paper 3368, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- PETTIGREW, A.M. 1979. On studying organizational cultures. Admin. Sct. Q. 24, 4, 570-581.Google Scholar
- PETTIGREW, A.M. 1973. The Politics of Organizational Decision Making'. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
- PFArFENBERGER, B. 1988. M~crocomputer Apphcations in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif. Google Scholar
- PFEFFER, J. 1980. Power in Organizations. Pitman, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
- PINCH, T. AND BIJKER, W. 1987. The social construction of facts and artifacts. In The Social Constructzon of Technological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 17-50.Google Scholar
- PORAC, J. F. AND THOMAS, H. 1990. Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Acad. Manage. Rev. 15, 2, 224-240.Google Scholar
- PORAC, J. F., THOMAS, H., AND BADEN-FULLER, C. 1989. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Manage. Stud. 26, 4, 397-416.Google Scholar
- RILEY, P. 1983. A structurationist account of political culture. Admin. Sci. Q. 28, 3, 347-414.Google Scholar
- S~CTNAN, A. R. 1991. Rigid politics and technological flexibility: The anatomy of a failed hospital innovation. Sci. Tech. Hum. Val. 16, 4, 419-447.Google Scholar
- SALANCIK, G. R. AND PFEFFER, J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin. Sci. Q. 23, 2,224 253.Google Scholar
- SCHEIN, E. 1987. The Chnical Perspective in Fieldwork. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif.Google Scholar
- SCHE~N, E. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
- SCHUTZ, A. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
- SCHWARTZ, H. 1990. Narcissistw Process and Corporate Decay: The Theory of the Organization Ideal. New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- SHELDON, A. 1980. Organization paradigms: A theory of organizational change. Org. Dynam. 8, 3 (Winter), 61-80.Google Scholar
- SHIBUTANI, T. 1962. Reference groups and social control. In Human Behavior and Social Processes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 128-147.Google Scholar
- SMIRCICH, L. AND STUBBART, C. 1985. Strategic management in an enacted world, Acad. Manage. Rev. 10, 4, 724 736.Google Scholar
- STARBUCK, W.H. 1989. Why organizations run into crises., and sometimes survive them. In Information Technology and Management Strategy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 11-33.Google Scholar
- STRAUSS, A. 1978. A social world perspective. Stud. Symb. Interaction 4, 171-190.Google Scholar
- TYRE, M. J. AND ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Org. Sci. To be published.Google Scholar
- VAN MAANEN, J. 1984. Doing new things in old ways: The chains of socialization. In College and University Organization. New York University Press, New York, 211-247.Google Scholar
- VAN MAANEN, J. AND BARLEY, S. 1985. Organizational culture: Fragments of a theory. In Organizational Culture. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 31-53.Google Scholar
- VAN MAANEN, J. AND SCHEIN, E. 1979. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Res. Org. Behav. 1, 209-264.Google Scholar
- WEICK, K.E. 1990. Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. In Technology and Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 1-44.Google Scholar
- WEICK, K.E. 1979a. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
- WE~CK, K.E. 1979b. Cognitive processes in organizations. Res. Org. Behav. 1, 1, 41-74.Google Scholar
- WEICK, K. E. ANn BOUGON, M.G. 1986. Organizations as cognitive maps: Charting ways to success and failure. In The Thinking Organizatwn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 102-135.Google Scholar
- WINNER, L. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
- WITTGENSTEIN, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Macmillan Press, New York.Google Scholar
- YIN, R.K. 1989. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Rev. ed. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.Google Scholar
- ZUBOFF, S. 1988. In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books, New York. Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Recommendations
Technological Frames, Organizational Capabilities, and IT Use: An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Procurement
The process by which organizations incorporate technological innovations into existing routines and use them on a regular basis persists as a central concern in the literature. Although we now have a fairly robust understanding of the drivers of ...
Expanding technological frames towards mediated collaboration: groupware adoption in virtual learning teams
This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the technological and social factors that led to the successful adoption of groupware by a virtual team in a educational setting. Drawing on a theoretical framework based on the concept of technological frames,...
Implications of dominant technological frames over a longitudinal period
Successful adoption and use of information systems is an area of continued research in the field of information systems. This prior research has shown that how we adopt and use an information system depends on how we make sense of it. The sense-making ...
Comments