skip to main content
10.1145/192844.193032acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The effects of interactive graphics and text on social influence in computer-mediated small groups

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer-mediated small group research has focused efforts on the medium of electronically networked text-based messages. An experiment which instead combines a synchronous text-based messaging medium with two-dimensional interactive computer graphics is detailed. Three-person groups participated in a risk-taking choice-dilemma task involving a discussion of the dilemma and consensus attainment. The groups' prediscussion and postdiscussion opinions were collected. Two conditions, one where groups received graphics-based feedback of their individual prediscussion opinions, and a second, which included a graphical representation of the prediscussion average, were coupled with a text-based communication medium. The text-based medium, without interactive graphics, served as control. In the condition involving the graphical prediscussion opinions and average, groups sent proportionately more messages containing persuasive-style arguments and proportionately fewer messages containing normative-style arguments. In the graphical condition without the average, roughly the inverse was found to occur. In the control, the discussion parameters fell proportionately between the two graphics conditions. In both graphics conditions, the first discussant to advocate a decision proposal had a stronger influence on the group decision than in the control. The data suggests that the inclusion of two-dimensional graphics can either augment or inhibit normative and informational forms of social influence during the group decision-making process.

References

  1. 1.Bransford, J. D, Barclay, J. R., and Franks, J. J. Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology 3 (1972), 193-209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.Bratman, M. E. What is intention? In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in Communication MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Churchland, P. M. Cognitive activity in artificial neural networks. In D. N. Osherson and E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Kaplan, S., and Simon, H. A. Foundations of cognitive science. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Kiesler, S. Derived from a personal communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52 (1992), 96-123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. 7.Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85 1988, 163-182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. 8.Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., and Simon, H. A. Why are some problems hard? Evidence from tower of hanoi. Cognitive Psychology } 7 (1985), 248-294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Lewis, C. M., and Toth, J.A. Situated cognition in diagrammatic reasoning. In N. H. Narayanan (Ed.), Working Notes, AAAI Spring Symposium on Reasoning with Diagrammatic Representations (March 25-27, Stanford University) 1992, pp. 47-52.{Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Loftus, E. E, Miller, D. G., and Bums, H. J. Semantic integration of verbal information in a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4 (1978), 19-31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.Lotman, ~. M. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Mandler, J. M., and Ritchey, G. H. Long-term memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3 (1977), 386-396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13.McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., and Siegel, J. Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 5, 1987, 917-930.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14.McLelland, J. L., and Rumelhart, D. E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88, 1981,375-407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15.Miller, C. E. The social psychological effects of group decision rules. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology ofgroup influence (2nd ed.) (pp. 327-355). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Nickerson, R. S., and Adams, M. J. Long-term memory for a common object. Cognitive Psychology 11 1979, 287-307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17.Paivio, A. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Posner, M. I. Seeing the mind. Science (Oct. 29, 1993), 262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. 19.Ridgeway, C. L. Dominance, performance, and status in groups: A theoretical analysis. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 1) (pp. 59-93). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Schneider, W., and Detweiler, M. A connectionist/control architecture for working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 21) (pp. 53-119). Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., and McGuire, T. W. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 1986, t57-187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Tabachnek, H., and Simon, H.A. Reasoning about economic markets. In N. H. Narayanan (Ed.), Working Notes, AAAI Spring Symposium on Reasoning with Diagrammatic Representations (March 25-27, Stanford University), 1992, pp. 59-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., and Stone, G.O. Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review 97, 4 (1990), 488-522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25.Weisband, S.P. Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53, 1992, 352-380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. 26.Wertsch, J.V. Voices of the Mind. A Socioculturat Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Zhang, J., and Norman, D.A. The Interaction of Internal and External Information in a Problem-Solving Task. Technical Report 9005, Dept of Cognitive Science UCSD, La Jolla, CA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The effects of interactive graphics and text on social influence in computer-mediated small groups

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader