- 1.Apple Computer. Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines. Addison-WesIey, Reading, MA, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2.Brooks, E Adding value to usability testing. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994, 253-270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. Getting around the taskartifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Trans. Infor. Systems 10, 2 (April 1992), 181-212. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Holcomb, R., and Tharp, A. L. An amalgamated model of software usability. In Knafl, G. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th IEEE COMPSAC international Conference, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 1989.Google Scholar
- 5.Holcomb, R., and Tharp, A. L. What users say about software usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 3, 1 (1991), 49-78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 6.Jeffries, R. Usability problem reports: Helping evaluators communicate effectively with developers. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994, 271-292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Jeffries, R. J., Miller, J. R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K. M. User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. Proc. ACM CHI'91 Conf. (New Orleans, LA, 28 April 28-3 May), 119-124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Karat, C. A comparison of user interface evaluation methods. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994, 203-232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Molich, R., and Nielsen, J. Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the A CM 33, 3 (March 1990), 338-348. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Nielsen, J. Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994, 25-64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. Teaching user interface design based on usability engineering. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 21, 1 (July 1989), 45-48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April 1990), 249-256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Polson, E G., and Lewis, C. H. Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction 5, 2&3 (1990), 191-220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 15.Rohn, J. A. Usability Engineering: improving Customer Satisfaction While Lowering Development Costs. Brochure, SunSoft, Inc., Mountain View, CA, 1993.Google Scholar
- 16.Smith, D. C., Irby, C., Kimball, R., Verplank, B., and Harslem, E. Designing the Star user interface. BYTE 7, 4 (April 1982), 242-282.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics
Recommendations
Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
CHI '92: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsUsability specialists were better than non-specialists at performing heuristic evaluation, and “double experts” with specific expertise in the kind of interface being evaluated performed even better. Major usability problems have a higher probability ...
How to develop usability heuristics
Numerous sets of usability heuristics have been designed for specific domains, as traditional heuristics do not evaluate the specific features of particular applications. A substantial portion of the existing research focuses on designing new sets of ...
Detailed Usability Heuristics: A Breakdown of Usability Heuristics to Enhance Comprehension for Novice Evaluators
HCI International 2020 - Late Breaking Papers: User Experience Design and Case StudiesAbstractHeuristic evaluation (HE) is one of the most commonly used usability evaluation methods. In HE, 3–5 evaluators evaluate a certain system guided by a list of usability heuristics with the goal of detecting usability issues. Although HE is popular ...
Comments