skip to main content
10.1145/1718918.1718945acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Home video communication: mediating 'closeness'

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 February 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Video-mediated communication (VMC) technologies are becoming rapidly adopted by home users. Little research has previously been conducted into why home users would choose to use VMC or their practices surrounding its use. We present the results of an interview and diary-based study of 17 people about their uses of, and attitudes towards, VMC. We highlight the artful ways in which users appropriate VMC to reconcile a desire for closeness with those with whom they communicate, and we explore the rich ways in which VMC supports different expressions of this desire. We conclude with discussions of how next-generation VMC technologies might be designed to take advantage of this understanding of human values in communicative practice.

References

  1. Anderson, A.H., Smallwood, L., MacDonald, R., Mullin, J., Fleming, A. & O'Malley, C. (2000). Video data and video links in mediated communication: What do users value? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(1), 165--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bell, G., Brooke, T., Churchill, E. & Paulos, E. (2003), Intimate Ubiquitous Computing. In Proc. UbiComp Workshop, 3--6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dourish, P. & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In Proc of CHI '92. ACM, New York, NY, 541--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fussell, S.R., Kraut, R.E., & Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. In Proc. of CSCW'00, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gaver, W., Sellen, A., Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1993). One is not enough: Multiple views in a media space. INTERCHI'93, 335--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gibbs, M.R., Vetere, F., Bunyan, M., and Howard, S. 2005. SynchroMate: a phatic technology for mediating intimacy. In Proc. of DUX '05. AIGA: American Institute of Graphic Arts, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Grayson, D. & Monk, A. (2003). Are you looking at me? Eye contact and desktop video conferencing. TOCHI, Vol. 10(3). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harper, R. (2009) From Telepresence to Human Absence -- the pragmatic construction of the human in communications systems research. In Proc. of .HCI 2009. BCS 73--82 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Heath, C. & Luff, P. (1991). Disembodied conduct: Communication through video in a multi-media environment. In Proc. of CHI, 99--103. ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hinds, P.J. & Kiesler, S. (2002) Distributed Work. MIT Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hirsh, S. Sellen, A. and Brokopp, N. (2005). Why HP People Do and Don't Use Videoconferencing Systems. HP Technical Report, HPL-2004-140(R.1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, S., Kientz, J.A., Patel, S.N., and Abowd, G.D. (2008). Are you sleeping?: sharing portrayed sleeping status within a social network. In Proc. of CSCW '08. ACM, New York, NY, 619--628 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Harper, R., and Wood, K. 2007. Understanding Videowork. In Proc. of CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 61--70 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Rother, C., and Wood, K. 2006. Understanding Photowork. In Proc. of CHI '06. ACM, New York, NY, 761--770 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lewis, A.V. & Cosier, G. (1997) Whither video? Pictorial culture and telepresence. BT Tech. Journ. 15, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lipartito, K. (2003). Picturephone and the information age: The social meaning of failure. Technology and Culture.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Matarazzo, G. & Sellen, A.J. (2000). The role of video in work at a distance: Addition or distraction? Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 19(5), 339--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. O'Brien, S. and Mueller, F. (2006) Holding hands over a distance: technology probes in an intimate, mobile context. In Proc. of OZCHI '06, ACM, 293--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. O'Hara, K., Black, A., & Lipson, M. (2006). Everyday practices with mobile video telephony. In Proc of CHI '06. ACM, New York, NY, 871--880 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Randall, D., Harper, R., & Rouncefield, M. (2007) Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sellen, A.J. (1995). Remote conversations: The effects of mediating talk with technology. Human-Computer Interaction. 10, 401--444 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Schindler, E. (2006). Lights, camera, inaction. netWorker 10, 1 (Mar. 2006), 11--13 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Vetere, F., Gibbs, M.R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K. & Bunyan, M. (2005) Mediating Intimacy: Designing Technologies to Support Strong-Tie Relationships. In Proc. of CHI '05. ACM, 471--480 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Whittaker, S. (2003). Things to talk about when talking about things. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 149--17 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Home video communication: mediating 'closeness'

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2010
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781605587950
      DOI:10.1145/1718918

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 February 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader