Duncan P. Brumby
Dario D. Salvucci
Andrew Howes
ABSTRACT
We investigate how people adapt their strategy for interleaving multiple concurrent tasks to varying objectives. A study was conducted in which participants drove a simulated vehicle and occasionally dialed a telephone number on a mobile phone. Experimental instructions and feedback encouraged participants to focus on either driving or dialing. Results show that participants adapted their task interleaving strategies to meet the required task objective, but in a manner that was nonetheless intricately shaped by internal psychological constraints. In particular, participants tended to steer in between dialing chunks of digits even when extreme vehicle drift implied that more reactive strategies would have generated better lane keeping. To better understand why drivers interleaved tasks at chunk boundaries, a modeling analysis was conducted to derive performance predictions for a range of dialing strategies. The analysis supported the idea that interleaving at chunk boundaries efficiently traded the time given up to dialing with the maintenance of a central lane position. We discuss the implications of this work in terms of contributions to understanding how cognitive constraints shape strategy adaptations in dynamic multitask environments.
- Alm, H.&Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behavior in a car following situation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27, 707--715.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C.,&Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036--1060.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bailey, B.P.,&Iqbal, S.T. (2008). Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14, 1--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brumby, D.P., Howes, A.,&Salvucci, D.D. (2007). A cognitive constraint model of dual-task trade-offs in a highly dynamic driving task. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (233--242). ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brumby, D.P., Salvucci, D.D.,&Howes, A. (2007). Dialing while driving? A bounded rational analysis of concurrent multi-task behavior. Proc. 8th International Conf. on Cognitive Modeling (121--126). Taylor&Francis.Google Scholar
- Brumby, D.P., Salvucci, D.D.,&Howes, A. (2007). An empirical investigation into dual-task trade-offs while driving and dialing. In Volume 2 Proc. of the 21st BCS HCI Group Conf. BCS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Card, S.K., Moran, T.P.,&Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eng, K., Lewis, R.L., Tollinger, I., Chu, A., Howes, A.,&Vera, A. (2006). Generating automated predictions of behavior strategically adapted to specific performance objectives. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (621--630). ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hildreth, E., Beusmans, J., Boer, E.,&Royden, C. (2000). From vision to action: experiments and models of steering control during driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1106--1132.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Horrey, W.J., Wickens, C.D.,&Consalus, K.P. (2006). Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 67--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Howes, A., Vera, A., Lewis, R.L., (2007). Bounding rational analysis: Constraints on asymptotic performance. In W.D. Gray (Ed.) Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems (403--413). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Levy, J.,&Pashler, H. (2008). Task prioritization in multitasking during driving: Opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 507--525.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meyer, D.E.,&Kieras, D.E. (1997). A computational theory of executive control processes and human multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miyata, Y.,&Norman, D.A. (1986). Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In D.A. Norman&S.W. Draper (Eds.), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction (265--284). LEA.Google Scholar
- Payne, S.J., Duggan, G.B.,&Neth, H. (2007). Discretionary task interleaving: Heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 370--388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reed, M.P.,&Green, P.A. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialing task. Ergonomics, 42,1015--1037.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Salvucci, D.D. (2001). Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: An integrated model approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55,85--107.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salvucci, D.D. (2005). A multitasking general executive for compound continuous tasks. Cognitive Science, 29, 457--492.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Salvucci, D.D.,&Macuga, K.L. (2002). Predicting the effects of cellular-phone dialing on driver performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 95--102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salvucci, D.D., Zuber, M., Beregovaia, E.,&Markley, D. (2005). Distract-R: Rapid prototyping and evaluation of in-vehicle interfaces. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (581--589). ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- U.S. Department of Transportation. National Transportation Statistics 2006. U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Focus on driving: how cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving
Recommendations
What's going on? Age, distraction, and multitasking during online survey taking
Participants in an online survey revealed what other activities they engaged in while taking it.Younger people were more likely than older people to multitask.The relationship between age, multitasking, and sense of distraction was curvilinear.Most ...
Effects of speech-based vs handheld e-mailing and texting on driving performance and experience
AutomotiveUI '11: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsIn this paper we present a voice-enabled service for handling e-mail and SMS messages while driving, and an evaluation of the service. In the evaluation, driving performance was compared in three conditions with a highway driving scenario in a driving ...
Not Merely Deemed as Distraction: Investigating Smartphone Users’ Motivations for Notification-Interaction
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsNotifications are commonly considered a distraction when they arrive during a task, and consequently, prior research has consistently sought effective ways of deferring their arrival until task transitions. However, many smartphone users still interact ...
Comments