skip to main content
10.1145/1409240.1409305acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Usage of spatial information for selection of co-located devices

Published:02 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Use of spatial information to support discovery of interaction opportunities has been widely demonstrated. In this paper, we focus on the use of spatial interfaces for identification and selection of devices a mobile user encounters in their immediate environment. We contribute an experimental evaluation of two spatial interface conditions in comparison with a non-spatial condition. The two spatial interface conditions are a device list ordered by distance and an iconic map of devices as seen from the user's perspective and the non-spatial condition is an alphabetical list. Our results show an overall user preference for the iconic map over the spatial and alphabetical list. However, there was no clear preference for the spatial interfaces over the non-spatial condition with respect to user satisfaction and mental load.

References

  1. Biehl J. T. and Bailey, B. P. 2004. ARIS: an interface for application relocation in an interactive space. In Proc. of the 2004 Conference on Graphics interface (London, Ontario, Canada, May 2004), 107--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brumitt, B., Krumm, J., Meyers B. and Shafer, S. 2000. Ubiquitous computing and the role of geometry. IEEE Personal Communications, pages 41--43, October 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload (Amsterdam, North Holland, 1988) Press. 239--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kortuem, G., Kray, C. and Gellersen, H. 2005. Sensing and visualizing spatial relations of mobile devices. In Proc. of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology (Seattle, WA, USA, October 23--26, 2005). UIST '05. ACM Press, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lewis, J. R. 1995. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, 1 (Jan. 1995), 57--78 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Newman, M. W., Sedivy, J. Z., Neuwirth, C. M., Edwards, W. K., Hong, J. I., Izadi, S., Marcelom, K. and Smith, T. F. 2002. Designing for serendipity: supporting end-user configuration of ubiquitous computing environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques DIS '02. 147--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rekimoto, J., Ayatsuka, Y., Kohno, M., and Oba, H. 2003. Proximal Interactions: A Direct Manipulation Technique for Wireless Networking. In Proc. of Interact'2003, 511--518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Schilit, B. N., Adams, N. I., and Want, R. 1994. Context-aware computing applications. In Proceedings of Workshop onMobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA), pages 85--90, 1994. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Usage of spatial information for selection of co-located devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services
      September 2008
      568 pages
      ISBN:9781595939524
      DOI:10.1145/1409240

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 September 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader