skip to main content
research-article

Making place for clutter and other ideas of home

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 July 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this article, we examine the containment of clutter in family homes and, from this, outline considerations for design. Selected materials from an ethnographically informed study of home life are used to detail the ways in which families contain their clutter in bowls and drawers. Clutter, within these containers, is found to be made up of a heterogeneous collection of things that, for all manner of reasons, hold an ambiguous status in the home. It is shown that bowls and drawers provide a “safe” site of containment for clutter, giving the miscellany of content the “space” to be properly dealt with and classified, or to be left unresolved. The shared but idiosyncratic practices families use to contain their clutter are seen to be one of the ways in which the home, or at least the idea of home, is collectively produced. It is also part of the means by which families come to make their homes distinct and unique. These findings are used to consider what it might mean to design for the home, and to do so in ways that are sensitive to the idiosyncratic systems of household organization. In conclusion, thought is given to how we design for people's ideas of home, and how we might build sites of uncertainty into homes, where physical as well as digital things might coalesce.

References

  1. Anderson, B. 1997. Work, ethnography and system design. In The Encyclopaedia of Microcomputers, A. Kent and J. G. Williams, Eds. Marcel Dekker, New York, 159--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. and Sharrock, W. 1992. Can organisations afford knowledge? Comput. Supp. Coop. Work, 1, 3, 143--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Berg, A.-J. 1999. A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house. In The Social Shaping of Technology, D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman, Eds. Open University Press, Buckingham, 301--313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Button, G. (ed). 1993. Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology. Routledge, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chung, K. H., Oh, K. S., Lee, C. H., Park, J. H., Kim, S., Kim, S. H., Loring, B., and Hass, C. 2003. A user-centered approach to designing home network interfaces. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (CHI'03). ACM Press, Ft., 648--649. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Covington, M. J., Long, W., Srinivasan, S., Dey, A. K., Ahamad, M., and Abowd, G. D. 2001. Securing context-aware applications using environment roles. Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, Workshop on Role Based Access Control. ACM Press, 10--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., and Rodden, T. 2002. Coordinate displays in the home. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW'02), Workshop on Public, Community and Situated Displays. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Crabtree, A. and Rodden, T. 2004. Domestic routines and design for the home. J. CSCW 13, 191--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., and Mariani, J. 2004. Collaborating around collections: informing the continued development of photoware. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW'04). ACM Press, IL, 396--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Daniels, I. Japanese material culture and consumerism: A review of recent work. 1999. J. Mat. Cul. 4, 2, 231--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Douglas, M. 2002. Purity and Danger. Routledge, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Douglas, M. 1991. The idea of a home: A kind of space. Soc. Resear, 58, 1, 287--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dourish, P. Design implications. 2006. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'06). ACM Press, 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dourish, P., Edwards, W. K., LaMarca, A., Lamping, J., Petersen, K., Salisbury, M., Terry, D. B., and Thornton, J. 2000. Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 18, 140--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dumais, S., Cutrell, E., Cadiz, J. J., Jancke, G., Sarin, R., and Robbins, D. C. 2003. Stuff I've seen: A system for personal information retrieval and re-use. Proceedings of the Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, (SIGIR'03). Toronto, Canada, 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Durkheim, E. 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards, K. and Grinter, R. 2001. At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, Atlanta, GA, 256--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Frohlich, D. M. Audiophotography: Bringing Photos to Life with Sounds. Kluwer Academic. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gaver, W., W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (CHI'03). ACM Press, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Harper, R. (ed). 2003. Inside the Smart Home. Springer, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Harper, R., Evergeti, V., Hamill, L., and Strain, J. 2000. Paper-mail in the home of the 21st Century. Tech. rep. Digital World Research Centre, University of Surrey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Heath, C. and Luff, P. Documents and professional practice: ‘Bad’ organizational reasons for ‘good’ clinical records work & records. 1996. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, (CSCW'96). ACM Press, New York, NY, 354--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hughes, J. A., Randall, D., and Shapiro, D. 1992. Faltering from ethnography to design. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'92). ACM Press, 115--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Malone, T. W. 1983. How do people organize their desks? Implications for the Design of office information systems. ACM Tran. Office Inform. Syst. 1, 1, 99--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Martin, B. Mother wouldn't like It!: Housework as magic. 1984. Theory, Culture Soc. 2, 19--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mungiatapia, E., Intille, S. S., and Larson, K. 2004. Activity recognition in the home setting using simple and ubiquitious sensors. Proceedings of the Coneference on Pervasive Computing. Springer-Verlag, 158--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mynatt, E. D., Essa, I., and Rogers, W. 2000. Increasing the opportunities for aging in place. Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Usability. ACM Press, 65--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Norman, D. A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. O'Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., and Hughes, J. 1999. At home with technology: An ethnographic study of a set-top-box trial. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6, 282--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Randall, D., Harper, R., and Rouncefield, M. 2007. Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rodden, T., Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Koleva, B., Humble, J., Åkesson, K.-P., and Hansson, P. 2004. Between the dazzle of a new building and its eventual corpse: Assembling the ubiquitous home. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, (DIS'04). ACM Press, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Smith, P. 1999. The elementary forms of place and their transformations: A Durkheimian Model. Qual. Sociol., 22, 13--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Spinellis, D. D. 2003. The information furnace: consolidated home control. Pers. Ubiq. Comput. 7, 53--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Suchman, L. 1994. Working relations of technology production and use. J. Comput.-Supp. Coop. Work 2, 21--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Taylor, A. S. and Harper, R. 2003. Switching On to Switch Off. In Inside the Smart Home, Harper, R. Ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 115--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor, A. S. and Swan, L. 2005. Artful systems in the home. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing systems, (CHI'05). ACM Press, 641--650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Tolmie, P., Pycock, J., Diggins, T., MacLean, A., and Karsenty, A. 2002. Unremarkable computing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (CHI 2002). ACM Press, 399--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Turner, V. 1977. Variations on a theme of liminality. In Secular Ritual Moore, S. and Meyerhoff, B. Eds. Van Gorcum, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. van Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Routledge, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zerubavel, E. 1992. Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Making place for clutter and other ideas of home

                Recommendations

                Reviews

                William Edward Mihalo

                Swan, Taylor, and Harper discuss the way families classify objects, with a particular focus on clutter. They note that clutter is difficult to define: We have come to think of clutter as something that is understood in relation to other categories that is, it is made up of things that are not easily classed by their unique features but rather by virtue of falling outside of other categories of things. In other words, clutter is defined not by what it is, but in part by what it is not. One might say that clutter is a residual category. The authors use ethnographic techniques from an ongoing study of family life. Three families are studied in their approach to clutter. The authors note that all three families they observed have a system for hiding clutter from view. This paper is a creative approach to a difficult task within computing. How do you classify things that are ambiguous__ __ In order to approach this, they cite Emile Durkheim's book [1]. Thus, it is not surprising that the authors note that "our sites of clutter demark the boundaries between structured and unstructured, ordered and disordered, sacred and profane." Carrying these observations over to computing in a home environment, the authors note: In designing technologies for uncertainty, dirty technologies where we are able to (re)produce our ideas of place, time and again, we thus have some basic tenets. The possibility of building technologies for ambiguity, instability, concealment and disinterest, and to be treated casually, hopefully gives us a position from which to rethink our design for homes that is somehow more true to how we live in them. Swan, Taylor, and Harper step outside the usual technology-focused and measurement-based methods to reach their conclusions. The paper is worth reading for its approach to clutter and also as a creative approach within human-computer interaction (HCI) for merging ethnographic analysis with the sociology of religion. Online Computing Reviews Service

                Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

                Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
                  ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 15, Issue 2
                  July 2008
                  81 pages
                  ISSN:1073-0516
                  EISSN:1557-7325
                  DOI:10.1145/1375761
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 2008 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 7 July 2008
                  • Accepted: 1 April 2008
                  • Revised: 1 September 2007
                  • Received: 1 July 2006
                  Published in tochi Volume 15, Issue 2

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article
                  • Research
                  • Refereed

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader