skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357071acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Attention by proxy? issues in audience awareness for webcasts to distributed groups

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Instructor/student interaction in e-learning environments can positively impact both student learning and instructor satisfaction. In online webcast lectures, however, interaction can be difficult because instructors lack basic awareness information about their remote students. Our goal is to better understand the kinds of awareness information that instructors should have if they are to interact frequently and effectively with their students in e-learning environments. We conducted an exploratory study -- via interviews and observations -- of instructor attention in face-to-face classrooms at a large university. Our results imply that a webcast system should provide instructors with overview and detailed data about their students, but that this detailed information should not be displayed publicly.

References

  1. Anderson, T. Getting the mix right again: an updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4, 2 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baecker, R., A principled design for scalable internet visual communications with rich media, interactivity, and structured archives. In Proc. CASCON (2003), 16--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bligh, D.A. What's the use of lectures. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyle, M. and Greenberg, S. The Language of Privacy: Learning from Video Media Space Analysis and Design. ACM TOCHI, 12, 2 (2005). 328--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chen, M., Achieving effective floor control with a low-bandwidth gesture-sensitive videoconferencing system. In Proc. ACM Multimedia (2002), 476--483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chen, M., Design of a virtual auditorium. In Proc. ACM Multimedia (2001), 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chen, M., Visualizing the pulse of a classroom. In Proc. ACM Multimedia (2003), 555--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Furnas, G., Generalized fisheye views. In Proc. ACM CHI (1986), 16--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jancke, G., Grudin, J. and Gupta, A., Presenting to Local and Remote Audiences: Design and Use of the TELEP System. In Proc. ACM CHI(2000), 384--391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jenkin, T., McGeachie, J., Fono, D. and Vertegaal, R., eyeView: focus+context views for large group video conferences. In Proc. ACM CHI(2005), 1497--1500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kastner, S. and Ungerleider, L.G. Mechanisms of Visual Attention in the Human Cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, (2000). 315--341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Matthews, T., Rattenbury, T. and Carter, S. Defining, designing and evaluating peripheral displays: An analysis using activity theory. HCI, 22, 1 (2007). 221--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Shea, P., Picket, A. and Li, C.S. Increasing access to higher education: A study of the diffusion of online teaching among 913 college faculty. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6, 2 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Webster, J. and Hackley, P. Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 6 (1997). 1282--1309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Attention by proxy? issues in audience awareness for webcasts to distributed groups

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2008
          1870 pages
          ISBN:9781605580111
          DOI:10.1145/1357054

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 April 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader