skip to main content
research-article

Distinctiveness of faces: A computational approach

Published:19 May 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper develops and demonstrates an original approach to face-image analysis based on identifying distinctive areas of each individual's face by its comparison to others in the population. The method differs from most others—that we refer as unary—where salient regions are defined by analyzing only images of the same individual. We extract a set of multiscale patches from each face image before projecting them into a common feature space. The degree of “distinctiveness” of any patch depends on its distance in feature space from patches mapped from other individuals. First a pairwise analysis is developed and then a simple generalization to the multiple-face case is proposed. A perceptual experiment, involving 45 observers, indicates the method to be fairly compatible with how humans mark faces as distinct. A quantitative example of face authentication is also performed in order to show the essential role played by the distinctive information. A comparative analysis shows that performance of our n-ary approach is as good as several contemporary unary, or binary, methods, while tapping a complementary source of information. Furthermore, we show it can also provide a useful degree of illumination invariance.

References

  1. Adini, Y., Moses, Y., and Ullman, S. 1997. Face recognition: The problem of compensating for changes in illumination direction. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19, 7, 721--732.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agarwal, S. and Roth, D. 2002. Learning a sparse representation for object detection. In Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision. Vol. 4. 113--130.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bailly-Baillire, E., Bengio, S., Bimbot, F., Hamouz, M., Kittler, J., Marithoz, J., Matas, J., Messer, K., Popovici, V., Pore, F., Ruiz, B., and Thiran, J.-P. 2003. The BANCA database and evaluation protocol. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication (AVBPA03). Springer-Verlag, New York. 625--638.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Belhumeur, P., Hespanha, J. P., and Kreigman, D. J. 1997. Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19, 7, 711--720.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bengio, S. and Mariétoz, J. 2004. A statistical significance test for person authentication. In Proc. of ODISSEY 2004, Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop. 237--244.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bicego, M., Grosso, E., and Tistarelli, M. 2005. On finding differences between faces. In Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, T. Kanade, A. Jain, and N. Ratha, Eds. Vol. LNCS 3546. Springer, New York. 329--338.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Braccini, C., Gambardella, G., Sandini, G., and Tagliasco, V. 1982. A model of the early stages of the human visual system: Functional and topological transformation performed in the peripheral visual field. Biol. Cybern. 44, 47--58.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brelstaff, G., Ibison, M., and Eliot, P. 1990. Edge-region integration for segmentation of mr images. In Proc. British Machine Vision Conference. 151--156.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brelstaff, G., Brodo, L., Bicego, M., and Grosso, E. 2006. Face-pair scrutiny—subject-type classification. Perception 35 ECVP Abstract Supplement, 209. ECVP06.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruce, V., Valentine, T., and Baddeley, A. 1987. The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1, 109--120.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bruce, V., Burton, A., and Dench, N. 1994. What's distinctive about a distinctive face? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47A, 119--141.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Campadelli, P. and Lanzarotti, R. 2004. Fiducial point localization in color images of face foregrounds. Image and Vision Computing 22, 863--872.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Collishaw, S. M. and Hole, G. J. 2000. Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception 29, 893--909.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Csurka, G., Dance, C., Bray, C., Fan, L., and Willamowski, J. 2004. Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In Proc. Workshop Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning in Computer Vision.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorko, G. and Schmid, C. 2003. Selection of scale-invariant parts for object class recognition. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision. Vol. 1. 634--640.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fergus, R., Perona, P., and Zisserman, A. 2003. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Vol. 2. 264.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M., Anderson, A., Skudlarski, P., and Gore, J. 1999. Activation of the middle fusiform “face area” increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience 2, 568--573.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gonzalez, R. and Woods, R. 2002. Digital Image Processing, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. González-Jiménez, D. and Alba-Castro, J. 2005. Biometrics discriminative face recognition through gabor responses and sketch distortion. In Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis: Second Iberian Conference. Vol. LNCS 3523. Springer-Verlag, New York. 513--520.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Goren, C., Sarty, M., and Wu, P. 1975. Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics 56, 544--549.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gross, R. and Brajovic, V. 2003. An image preprocessing algorithm for illumination invariant face recognition. In Audio- and video-based biometric person authentification, J. Kittler and M. Nixon, Eds. Vol. LNCS 2688. 10--18.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Grosso, E. and Tistarelli, M. 2000. Log-polar stereo for anthropomorphic robots. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision. Vol. 1. Springer-Verlag, New York. 299--313.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Haith, M., Bergman, T., and Moore, M. 1979. Eye contact and face scanning in early infancy. Science 198, 853--854.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Itti, L., Koch, C., and Niebur, E. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 11, 1254--1259.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jojic, N., Frey, B., and Kannan A. 2003. Epitomic analysis of appearance and shape. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision. Vol. 1. 34--41.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kim, J., Choi, J., Yi, J., and Turk, M. 2005. Effective representation using ica for face recognition robust to local distortion and partial occlusion. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27, 12, 1977--1981.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kirby, M. and Sirovich, L. 1990. Application of the Karhunen-Loeve procedure for the characterization of human faces. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12, 1, 103--108.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Klin, A. 2001. Eye-tracking of social stimuli in adults with autism. Paper presented at the meeting of the NICHD Collaborative Program of Excellence in Autism. Yale University, New Haven, CT.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Koch, C. and Ullman, S. 1985. Shifts in selective visual-attention ñ towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology 4, 219--227.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Li, S., Hou, X., and Zhang, H. 2001. Learning spatially localized, parts-based representation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 1, 207--212.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindeberg, T. 1993. Detecting salient blob-like image structures and their scales with a scale-space primal sketch: A method for focus-of-attention. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 11, 3, 283--318.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lowe, D. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 60, 2, 91--110.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Maio, D., Maltoni, D., Jain, A. K., and Prabhakar, S. 2003. Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition. Springer Verlag, New York.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Marr, D. 1982. Vision. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Messer, K., Matas, J., Kittler, J., Luettin, J., and Maitre, G. 1997. XM2VTSDB: The extended M2VTS database. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Audio and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ming-Hsuan, Y., Kriegman, D., and Ahuja, N. 2002. Detecting faces in images: a survey. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24, 3458.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Nahm, F., Perret, A., Amaral, D., and Albright, T. 1997. How do monkeys look at faces? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9, 611--623.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. O'Toole, A. 2004. Psychological and neural perspectives. In Handbook of Face Recognition, S. Li and A. Jain, Eds. Springer-Verlag, New York. 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. O'Toole, A., Jiang, F., Abdi, H., and Haxby, J. 2005. Partially distributed representations of objects and faces in ventral temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, 4, 580--590.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. O'Toole, A., Jiang, F., Roark, D., and Abdi, H. 2006. Predicting human performance for face recognition. In Face Processing: Advanced models and methods, R. Chellappa and W. Zhao, Eds. Academic Press, New York. in press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Penev, P. and Atick, J. 1996. Local feature analysis: a general statistical theory for object representation. Network: computation in Neural Systems 7, 3, 477--500.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Perlibakas, V. 2004. Distance measures for PCA-based face recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters 25, 6, 711--724.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Phillips, P., Scruggs, P. F. T., Bowyer, K., Chang, J., Hoffman, K., an J. Min, J. M., and Worek, W. 2005. Overview of the face recognition grand challenge. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Vol. 1. 947--954.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Salah, A., Alpaydin, E., and Akarun, L. 2002. A selective attention-based method for visual pattern recognition with application to handwritten digit recognition and face recognition. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24, 3, 420--425.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Senior, A. 1999. Face and feature finding for a face recognition system. In Proc. of Audio- and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication. 154--159.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Tistarelli, M. and Sandini, G. 1993. On the advantages of polar and log-polar mapping for direct estimation of time-to-impact from optical flow. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 15, 4, 401--410.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Tsotsos, J., Culhane, S., Wai, W., Lai, Y., Davis, N., and Nuflo, F. 1995. Modelling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence 78, 507--545.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Turk, M. and Pentland, A. 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3, 1, 71--86.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., and Sali, E. 2002. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience 5, 682--687.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Walther, D. 2006. Interactions of visual attention and object recognition: computational modeling, algorithms, and psychophysics. Ph.D. thesis, Pasadena, CA.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiskott, L., Fellous, J.-M., and der Malsburg, C. V. 1997. Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19, 775--779.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Yarbus, A. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao, W., Chellappa, R., Phillips, P., and Rosenfeld, A. 2003. Face recognition: A literature survey. ACM Computing Surveys 35, 399--458.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Distinctiveness of faces: A computational approach

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
          ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 5, Issue 2
          May 2008
          120 pages
          ISSN:1544-3558
          EISSN:1544-3965
          DOI:10.1145/1279920
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 May 2008
          • Accepted: 1 June 2007
          • Revised: 1 November 2006
          • Received: 1 June 2006
          Published in tap Volume 5, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader