skip to main content
10.1145/1011870.1011881acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Experience clip: method for user participation and evaluation of mobile concepts

Published:27 July 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes experiences from using a field testing technique for collecting user experience information for evaluating mobile applications used in everyday life. Our technique is based on the usage of mobile camera phones that are used for capturing video and audio during the use of the mobile application. The users helped researchers in collecting user experience material by shooting the video clips themselves. To our surprise they also started to participate actively by presenting "miniplays" in the clips to make their point clear. Our results show that with this technique we can get richer emotional material and more versatile usage situations than with traditional observation methods, and additionally there is clearly a yet unexplored potential to develop a more systematic design method around participation.

References

  1. Beck, E., Christiansen, M., Kjeldskov, J., Kolve, N. and Stage, J. Experimental Evaluation of Techniques for Usability Testing of Mobile Systems in a Laboratory Setting. In Proceedings of OzCHI. (2003).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchenau, M. and Fulton Suri, J. Experience Prototyping. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems. ACM Press, (2000), 424--433.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buur, J., Binder, T. and Brandt, E. Taking Video Beyond 'Hard Data' in User Centered Design. In Proceedings of PDC 2000, (Palo Alto 2000), 21--29.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Desmet, P., Overbeeke, C. and Tax, S. Designing Products with Added Emotional Value; Development and Application of an Approach for Research Through Design. The Design Journal, (4(1) 2001), 32--47.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Engeström, Y. Expansive Visibilization of work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (vol. 8 1999), 63--93]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Goldman-Segall, R. Collaborative Virtual Communities: Using Learning Constellations, A Multimedia Eghnographic Research Tool. In Sociomedia: Multimedia, Hypermedia, and the Social Construction of Knowledge (Ed. Barrett E.). The MIT Press. (1992), 257--296.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Iacucci, G. Iacucci, C. and Kuutti, K. Imaging and Experiencing in Design -- the Role of Performances. In Proceedings of the 2nd Nordic Conference on Human--Computer Interaction, (Aarhus September 2002).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jones, M.L.W., Rieger, R.H., Treadwell, P. and Gay, G.K Live from the stacks: User Feedback on Mobile Computers and Wireless Tools for Library Patrons. Digital Libraries, (2000), 95--102.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kaikkonen, A. and Roto, V. Navigating in a Mobile XHTML Application. CHI Letters (vol. No. 5, Issue No. 1 2003), 329--336.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Karasti, H. Increasing sensitivity towards everyday work practice in system design. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, University of Oulu (available also from http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514259556/ ), 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Larson, R. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. The Experience Sampling Method. In Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction: New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioural Science (Ed. Reis, H.T.) San Francisco. Jossey Bass. 1983.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Newcomb, E., Pahsley, T. and Stasko, J. Mobile Computing in the Retail Arena. CHI Letters (vol. 5 No. 1. 2003), 337--344.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Palen, L. and Salzman, M. Voice-Mail Diary Studies for Naturalistic Data Capture under Mobile Conditions. In: In Proceedings of ACM CSCW'02, (2002), 87--95.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pöysä, J., Mäkitalo, K. and Häkkinen. P. A Participant Experience Method for Illustrating Individuals' Experiences in the Course of and Evolving Virtual Learning Community. Designing for Change, (2003), 451--460]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Waterson, S., Landay, J.A. and Matthews, T. In the Lab and Out in the Wild: Remote Web Usability Testing for Mobile Devices. In CHI2002 Short Paper, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Experience clip: method for user participation and evaluation of mobile concepts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PDC 04: Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - Volume 1
      July 2004
      245 pages
      ISBN:1581138512
      DOI:10.1145/1011870

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 July 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader