Abstract
Optimal family relationships are central to individual well-being. The focus of this paper is on family functioning and how socioeconomic status (SES) explains family functioning. Ecological theory states that a family’s socioeconomic context is determined by macro-systemic factors, thereby influencing individuals’ perceptions of family functioning. Within this context, the social causation hypothesis asserts that social conditions influence family functioning. This paper uses the Family Attachment and Changeability Index as measure of family functioning. SES is viewed as multidimensional and individual-, household-, and subjective SES indices are developed using multiple correspondence analysis. Multivariate regression models suggest that household- and subjective SES are associated with higher levels of perceived flexibility in the family. There is no association between SES and family members’ attachment to each other. In general, the findings support the social causation hypothesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Related but contrasting to the social causation perspective is the social selection perspective, which states that individual personality traits and characteristics influence the family’s SES (Conger and Donnellan 2007; Conger et al. 2010; Schofield et al. 2011). It is highly likely that both social causation and social selection may apply to any specific family context. The possibility of this interplay led to the development of the interactionist perspective (Conger et al. 2010; Schofield et al. 2011), which takes both the social causation and social selection perspectives into account when considering the relationship between family functioning and SES. As the data used in this paper do not contain sufficient data to examine the social selection perspective and hence also the interactionist approach, which also requires longitudinal data over a long time period, this paper focuses solely on the social causation perspective.
Another framework consistent with the social causation perspective is the Family Investment Model (FIM), which posits that since higher-SES families have more resources than lower-SES families, higher-SES families will invest more in the development of their children than lower-SES families (Wadsworth and Achenbach 2005; Conger et al. 2010; Schofield et al. 2011). These investments will ultimately benefit the emotional and cognitive well-being of the children of higher-SES families more than lower-SES families. For the purposes and context of this paper, the FSM is clearly the more relevant theory related to the social causation perspective.
For each respondent, the item responses are summed for each sub-scale. To derive the Attachment score in the African American scale, for instance, summed Attachment scores are recoded as follows: 0–10 = 1, 11–16 = 2, 17–22 = 3, 23–27 = 4, 28–33 = 5, and 34–40 = 6. Following summation of the Changeability scores, they are recoded as follows: 0–9 = 1, 10–12 = 2, 13–16 = 3, 17–20 = 4, 21–24 = 5, and 25–40 = 6. As an example, if the sum of a respondent’s answers to the Attachment scale equals 13, a value of 2 is assigned to that respondent. Assuming that the sum of that respondent’s answers on the Changeability scale equals 13, a value of 3 is assigned. For that specific respondent, the Attachment score is 2, the Changeability score is 3, and the overall FACI8 score is (2 + 3)/2 = 2.5. The overall FACI8 score is used mainly to classify families into four family functioning types (balanced, midrange, moderate, extreme), but for the purposes of this paper these family types are not applicable.
The CFA from which the Attachment and Changeability factor scores are derived displayed very good overall fit indices (S-B χ 2(103) = 460.1, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.042; CFI = 0.938; SRMR = 0.043). See Botha et al. (2016) for more information.
References
Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2010). The power of the family. Journal of Economic Growth, 15, 93–125.
Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2013). Family ties. NBER Working Paper No. 18966. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Amoateng, A. Y., Heaton, T. B., & Kalule-Sabiti, I. (2007). Living arrangements in South Africa. In A. Y. Amoateng & T. B. Heaton (Eds.), Families and households in post-apartheid South Africa: Socio-demographic perspectives (pp. 43–59). Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Aytaç, I. A., & Rankin, B. H. (2009). Economic crisis and marital problems in Turkey: Testing the family stress model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 756–767.
Barbarin, O. A., & Khomo, N. (1997). Indicators of economic status and social capital in South African townships: What do they reveal about the material and social conditions in families of poor children? Childhood, 4(2), 193–222.
Barnett, M. A. (2008). Economic disadvantage in complex family systems: Expansion of family stress models. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 145–161.
Blakemore, T., Strazdins, L. & Gibbings, J. (2009). Measuring family socioeconomic position. Australian Social Policy, 8, 121–168.
Bogenschneider, K., Little, O. M., Ooms, T., Benning, S., Cadigan, K., & Corbett, T. (2012). The family impact lens: A family-focused, evidence-informed approach to policy and practice. Family Relations, 61, 514–531.
Botha, F., & Booysen, F. (2014). Family functioning and life satisfaction and happiness in South African households. Social Indicators Research, 119(1), 163–182.
Botha, F., Wouters, E., & Booysen, F. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Family Attachment and Changeability Index (FACI8) in South Africa. Mimeo: University of Antwerp.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.
Brown, O., & Robinson, J. (2012). Resilience in remarried families. South African Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 114–126.
Budlender, D., & Lund, F. (2011). South Africa: A history of family disruption. Development and Change, 42(4), 925–946.
Byles, J., Byrne, C., Boyle, M. H., & Offord, D. R. (1988). Ontario child health study: Reliability and validity of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Family Process, 27(1), 97–104.
Clark, A. F., Barrett, L., & Kolvin, I. (2000). Inner city disadvantage and family functioning. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 77–83.
Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (2002). Resilience in Midwestern families: Selected findings from the first decade of a prospective, longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 361–373.
Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (2008). Understanding the processes through which economic hardship influences families and children. In D. R. Crane & T. B. Heaton (Eds.), Handbook of families and poverty (pp. 64–81). London: Sage Publications.
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175–199.
Conger, R. D., Ge, X., Elder, G. H., Lorenz, F. O., & Simons, R. L. (1994). Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Development, 65(2), 541–561.
Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 179–193.
Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socio-economic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 685–704.
Dauphin, A., El Lahga, A.-R., Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G. (2011). Are children decision-makers within the household? Economic Journal, 121, 871–903.
Denny, D., Gavidia-Payne, S., Davis, K., Francis, A., & Jackson, M. (2014). Strengthening Australian families: Socioeconomic status, social connectedness, and family functioning. Australian Social Work, 67(3), 438–450.
Diemer, M. A., Mistry, R. S., Wadsworth, M. E., López, I., & Reimers, F. (2013). Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 77–113.
Donnellan, M. B., Conger, K. J., McAdams, K. K., & Neppl, T. K. (2009). Personal characteristics and resilience to economic hardship and its consequences: Conceptual issues and empirical illustrations. Journal of Personality, 77(6), 1645–1676.
Fotso, J.-C., & Kuate-Defo, B. (2005). Measuring socioeconomic status in health research in developing countries: Should we be focusing on households, communities or both? Social Indicators Research, 72, 189–237.
Georgiades, K., Boyle, M. H., Jenkins, J. M., Sanford, M., & Lipman, E. (2008). A multilevel analysis of whole family functioning using the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 344–354.
Gorman-Smith, D., Florsheim, P., Tolan, P. H., & Henry, D. B. (2000). Patterns of family functioning and adolescent outcomes among urban African American and Mexican American families. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(3), 436–457.
Greeff, A. P. (2000). Characteristics of families that function well. Journal of Family Issues, 21(8), 948–962.
Greeff, A. P., & de Villiers, M. (2008). Optimism in family resilience. Social Work Practitioner-Researcher, 20(1), 21–34.
Greeff, A. P., & Holtzkamp, J. (2007). The prevalence of resilience in migrant families. Family and Community Health, 30(3), 189–200.
Greenacre, M. J. (2006). Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
Han, C.-K., & Rothwell, D. W. (2014). Savings and family functioning since the 2008 recession: An exploratory study of Singapore. International Social Work, 57(6), 630–644.
Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Berry, T. R. (2001). GARP for kids: On the development of rational choice behavior. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1539–1545.
Howe, L. D., Hargreaves, J. R., & Huttly, S. R. A. (2008). Issues in the construction of wealth indices for the measurement of socio-economic position in low-income countries. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5(3), 1–14.
Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). (2012). 2012 South African Social Attitudes Survey. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
Jonker, L., & Greeff, A. P. (2009). Resilience factors in families living with people with mental illnesses. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(7), 859–873.
Kabudula, C. W., Houle, B., Collinson, M. A., Kahn, K., Tollman, S., & Clark, S. (2016). Assessing changes in household socioeconomic status in rural South Africa, 2001–2013: A distributional analysis using household asset indicators. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1397-z.
Latham, B. C., Sowell, R. L., Phillips, K. D., & Murdaugh, C. (2001). Family functioning and motivation for childbearing among HIV-infected women at increased risk for pregnancy. Journal of Family Nursing, 7(4), 345–370.
Lebow, J., & Stroud, C. B. (2012). Assessment of effective couple and family functioning. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (4th ed., pp. 501–528). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Li, L., Lin, C., Ji, G., Sun, S., & Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (2009). Parents living with HIV in China: Family functioning and quality of life. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 93–101.
Li, X., Zou, H., Liu, Y., & Zhou, Q. (2014). The relationships of family socioeconomic status, parent-adolescent conflict, and filial piety to adolescents’ family functioning in Mainland China. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 29–38.
Lundberg, S., Romich, J. L., & Tsang, K. P. (2009). Decision-making by children. Review of Economics of the Household, 7, 1–30.
Ma, J. L. C., Wong, T. K. Y., Lau, Y. K., & Pun, S. H. (2009a). Perceived family functioning and family resources of Hong Kong families: Implications for social work practice. Journal of Family Social Work, 12, 244–263.
Ma, J. L. C., Wong, T. K. Y., & Lau, Y. K. (2009b). Sex differences in perceived family functioning and family resources in Hong Kong families: Implications for social work practice. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 3, 155–174.
Ma, J. L. C., Wong, T. K. Y., Lau, Y. K., & Lai, L. L. Y. (2011). Parenting stress and perceived family functioning of Chinese parents in Hong Kong: Implications for social work practice. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 5, 160–180.
Mansfield, A. K., Dealy, J. A., & Keitner, G. I. (2013). Family functioning and income: Does low-income status impact family functioning? The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 21(3), 297–305.
Masquillier, C., Wouters, E., Mortelmans, D., & Booysen, F. (2014). Families as catalysts for peer adherence support in enhancing hope for people living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 17, 1–10.
Masquillier, C., Wouters, E., Mortelmans, D., & Booysen, F. (2015). The impact of community support initiatives on the stigma experienced by people living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa. AIDS and Behavior, 19(2), 214–226.
McCreary, L. L., & Dancy, B. L. (2004). Dimensions of family functioning: Perspectives of low-income African American single-parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 690–701.
McCubbin, H. I., Thompson, A. I., & Elver, K. M. (1996). Family Attachment and Changeability Index 8 (FACI8). In H. I. McCubbin, A. I. Thompson, & M. A. McCubbin (Eds.), Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation: Inventories for research and practice (pp. 725–751). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Meyers, S. A., Varkey, S., & Aguirre, A. M. (2002). Ecological correlates of family functioning. American Journal of Family Therapy, 30(3), 257–273.
Møller, V. (2013). South African quality of life trends over three decades, 1980–2010. Social Indicators Research, 113, 915–940.
Nkosi, B., & Daniels, P. (2007). Family strengths: South Africa. Marriage and Family Review, 41(1–2), 11–26.
Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (3rd ed., pp. 514–547). New York: Guilford Press.
Orthner, D. K., Jones-Sanpei, H., & Williamson, S. (2004). The resilience and strengths of low-income families. Family Relations, 53, 159–167.
Patterson, J. M. (2002a). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 349–360.
Patterson, J. M. (2002b). Understanding family resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 233–246.
Philbrick, C. A., & Fitzgerald, M. A. (2007). Women in business-owning families: A comparison of roles, responsibilities and predictors of family functionality. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 618–634.
Phongsavan, P., Chey, T., Bauman, A., Brooks, R., & Silove, D. (2006). Social capital, socioeconomic status and psychological distress among Australian adults. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2546–2561.
Rawatlal, N., Pillay, B. J., & Kliewer, W. (2015). Socioeconomic status, family-related variables, and caregiver–adolescent attachment. South African Journal of Psychology, 45(4), 551–563.
Reising, M. M., Watson, K. H., Hardcastle, E. J., Merchant, M. J., Roberts, L., Forehand, R., et al. (2013). Parental depression and economic disadvantage: The role of parenting in associations with internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 335–343.
Roelofse, R., & Middleton, M. R. (1985). The family functioning in adolescence questionnaire: A measure of psychosocial family health during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 8(1), 33–45.
Rothwell, D. W., & Han, C.-K. (2010). Exploring the relationship between assets and family stress among low-income families. Family Relations, 59(4), 396–407.
Schofield, T. J., Martin, M. J., Conger, K. J., Donnellan, M. B., Neppl, T., & Conger, R. D. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of adaptive functioning: A test of the interactionist model of SES and human development. Child Development, 82(1), 33–47.
Seccombe, K. (2002). “Beating the odds” versus “changing the odds”: Poverty, resilience, and family policy. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 384–394.
Shek, D. T. L., Leung, H., & Lu, S. (2014). Perceived family life quality in junior secondary school students in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 117, 757–775.
Sheppard, Z. A., Norris, S. A., Pettifor, J. M., Cameron, N., & Griffiths, P. L. (2009). Approaches for assessing the role of household socioeconomic status on child anthropometric measures in urban South Africa. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 48–54.
Sourial, N., Wolfson, C., Zhu, B., Quail, J., Fletcher, J., Karunananthan, S., et al. (2010). Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 638–646.
Stepleman, L. M., Wright, D. E., & Bottonari, K. A. (2009). Socioeconomic status: Risks and resilience. In S. Loue & M. Sajatovic (Eds.), Determinants of minority mental health and wellness (pp. 1–30). New York: Springer.
Taliep, N., Ismail, G., Seedat, M., & Suffla, S. (2014). Development of a family functioning scale for the South African context: The substantive validity phase. Child Abuse Research: A South African Journal, 15(1), 73–82.
Tiffin, P. A., Pearce, M., Kaplan, C., Fundudis, T., & Parker, L. (2007). The impact of socio-economic status and mobility on perceived family functioning. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 653–667.
Wadsworth, M. E., & Achenbach, T. M. (2005). Explaining the link between low socioeconomic status and psychopathology: Testing two mechanisms of the social causation hypothesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1146–1153.
Waite, L. J. (2000). The family as a social organization: Key ideas for the twenty-first century. Contemporary Sociology, 29(3), 463–469.
Walsh, F. (2016). The new normal: Diversity and complexity in 21st-century families. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (4th ed., pp. 3–27). New York: Guilford Press.
Warren, J. R. (2009). Socioeconomic status and health across the life course: A test of the social causation and health selection hypotheses. Social Forces, 87(4), 2125–2154.
Wilhelm, K., Brownhill, S., & Boyce, P. (2000). Marital and family functioning: Different measures and viewpoints. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 35, 358–365.
Williams, D. T., Cheadle, J. E., & Goosby, B. J. (2015). Hard times and heartbreak: Linking economic hardship and relationship distress. Journal of Family Issues, 36(7), 924–950.
Wouters, E., Masquillier, C., Ponnet, K., & Booysen, F. (2014). A peer adherence support intervention to improve the antiretroviral treatment outcomes of HIV patients in South Africa: The moderating role of family dynamics. Social Science and Medicine, 113, 145–153.
Yang, Y., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2004). Measuring socioeconomic status at individual and collective levels. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 259–288.
Acknowledgements
We thank an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions. Financial support for this research was provided by Rhodes University (PGSD05/2015 and PGSD07/2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 12.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Botha, F., Booysen, F. & Wouters, E. Family Functioning and Socioeconomic Status in South African Families: A Test of the Social Causation Hypothesis. Soc Indic Res 137, 789–811 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1600-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1600-x