Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Alternative Models of Individual Quality of Life for Social Service Recipients

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is considerable debate in the area of individual quality of life research regarding the factor structure of the QOL construct that is focused on the number and composition of QOL factors and domains, and its hierarchical nature. The main goal of this study involve testing by means of confirmatory factor analyses five models that have been pointed out by recent scientific literature: firstly, an unidimensional model; secondly, a QOL model that consisted of eight inter-correlated domains proposed by Schalock and Verdugo (2002); thirdly, a model composed of these eight 1st-order factors and one 2nd- order factor; the forth and five are model with the eight 1st-order factors and three 2nd-order factor that has been denominated in other studies ‘Salamanca model’ and ‘Schalock model’. Data were collected from 3.029 social service recipients from Catalonia (Spain) who completed the GENCAT Scale, an objective QOL questionnaire. The best fit of the eight inter-correlated and 1st order domains was empirically demonstrated. Implications for future research are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arias, B. (2008). Desarrollo de un ejemplo de análisis factorial confirmatorio con LISREL, AMOS y SAS. In M. A. Verdugo, M. Crespo, M. Badía, & B. Arias (Eds.), Metodología en la investigación sobre discapacidad. Introducción al uso de las ecuaciones estructurales. Salamanca, Spain: INICO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aznar, A. S., & Castañón, G. G. (2005). Quality of life from the point of view of Latin American families: A participative research study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 784–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Coenders, G. (2000). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Madrid: Hespérides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, G. S., Basehart, S., & Marchand, C. B. (2003). Ask me! FY2003 report: The quality of life of Marylanders with developmental disabilities receiving DDA funded support. Baltimore, Maryland: The ARC of Maryland. http://www.bonhamresearch.com/PDF/2003TBasehart%20Ask%20Me%20FY003Sum.pdf. Retrieved Oct 26 2006.

  • Bonham, G. S., Basehart, S., Schalock, R. L., Marchand, C. G., Kirchner, N., & Rumenap, J. M. (2004). Consumer-based quality of life assessment: The Maryland ask me! project. Mental Retardation, 42, 338–355. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<338:CQOLAT>2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. New Jersey: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cea, M. A. (2002). Análisis multivariable. Teoría y práctica en la investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, Y. C., & Schalock, R. L. (2009). Survey outcomes and cross-national comparisons of quality of life with respect to people with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 7–10. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2008.00200.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claes, C., van Hove, G., van Loon, J., Vandevelde, S., & Schalock, R. L. (2009). Quality of life measurement in the field of intellectual disabilities: Eight principles for assessing quality of life-related personal outcomes. Social Indicator Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9517-7.

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). Quality of life and disability. In P. O′Brien & R. Murray (Eds.), Human services: Towards partnership and support (pp. 255–268). Auckland, NZ: Dunmore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life. In I. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for people with disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 116–150). Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thorne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72. doi:10.1023/A:1007027822521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 699–706. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00738.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 51–74. doi:10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1996). Assessment of quality of life. In R. L. Schalock (Ed.), Quality of life, vol. I: Conceptualization and measurement (pp. 63–73). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1997). Quality of life: The scope of the term and its breadth of measurement. In R. I. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for persons with disabilities: Models, research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 56–71). Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. F., & Carran, D. (2005). Attainment of personal outcomes by people with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 43, 157–174. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43[157:AOPOBP]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Software International. (2006). LISREL, v.8.8 (computer software). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenaro, C., Verdugo, M. A., Caballo, C., Balboni, G., Lachapelle, Y., Otbrebski, W., et al. (2005). Cross-cultural study of person-centered quality of life domains and indicators: A replication. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 734–739. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00742.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: foundations and extensions. Psychometrika, 54, 681–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, K. D. (2007). Quality of life. In A. Carr, G. O’Reilly, P. N. Walsh, & J. M. Cevoy (Eds.), The handbook of intellectual disability and clinical psychology practice (pp. 143–168). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, K. D., & Schalock, R. L. (2000). Cross-cultural perspectives on quality of life. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, K. D., Heal, L. W., & Schalock, R. L. (1996). Cross-cultural measurement of critical quality of life concepts. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 21, 273–293. doi:10.1080/13668259600033201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kober, R., & Eggleton, I. R. C. (2002). Factor stability of the Schalock and Keith (1993) quality of life questionnaire. Mental Retardation, 40, 157–165. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0157:FSOTSA>2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.). (2001). New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry, K., Maes, B., & Vlaskamp, C. (2005). Domains of quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities: The perspective of parents and direct support staff. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 35–46. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00209.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, K., Maes, B., & Vlaskamp, C. (2007). Support characteristics associated with the quality of life of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: The perspective of parents and direct support staff. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 104–110. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00107.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T., & Markoulides, G. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analyses. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, P., Durieu, F., Campoy, E., & El Akremi, A. (2002). Méthodes d’équations structurelles: Recherche et applications en gestion. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. Von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., & Bonham, G. S. (2003). Measuring outcomes and managing for results. Evaluation & Program Planning, 26, 229–235. doi:10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00027-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., & Keith, K. D. (1993). Quality of life questionnaire. Worthington, OH: IDS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., & Verdugo, M. A. (2002). Quality of life for human service practitioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., & Verdugo, M. A. (2007). El concepto de calidad de vida en los servicios y apoyos para personas con discapacidad intelectual. Siglo Cero, 38, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., Verdugo, M. A., Jenaro, C., Wang, M., Wehmeyer, M., Xu, J., et al. (2005). A cross-cultural study of quality of life indicators. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 298–311. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[298:CSOQOL]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., Gardner, J. F., & Bradley, V. J. (2007). Quality of life for people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities. Applications across individuals, organizations, communities, and systems. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L., Keith, K. D., Verdugo, M. A., & Gomez, L. E. (in press). Quality of life model development in the field of intellectual disability. In R. Kober (Ed.), Quality of life for people with intellectual disability. New York: Springer.

  • Skevington, S. (2002). Advancing cross-cultural research on quality of life: Observations drawn from the WHOQOL development. Quality of Life Research, 11, 135–144. doi:10.1023/A:1015013312456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A. (2006). Cómo mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas con discapacidad. Salamanca: Amarú.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A. (2009). Calidad de vida, I + D + i y políticas sociales. Siglo Cero, 40, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A., Prieto, G., Caballo, C., & Peláez, A. (2005). Factorial structure of the quality of life questionnaire in a Spanish sample of visually disabled adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 44–55. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00750.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A., Schalock, R. L., Gómez, L. E., & Arias, B. (2007). Construcción de escalas de calidad de vida multidimensionales centradas en el contexto: la Escala GENCAT. Siglo Cero, 38, 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B., Gómez, L. E., & Schalock, R. L. (2008a). Formulari de l’Escala Gencat de Qualitat de vida. Manual d’aplicació de l’Escala Gencat de Qualitat de vida. Barcelona: Departamento de Acción Social y Ciudadanía, Generalitat de Cataluña.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B., Gómez, L. E., & Schalock, R. L. (2008b). Escala GENCAT. Informe sobre la creació d’una escala multidimensional per avaluar la qualitat de vida de les persones usuàries dels serveis socials a Catalunya. Barcelona: Departamento de Acción Social y Ciudadanía, Generalitat de Cataluña.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B., Gómez, L. E., & Schalock, R. L. (2009). Formulario de la Escala GENCAT de Calidad de vida. Manual de aplicación de la Escala GENCAT de Calidad de vida. Barcelona: Departamento de Acción Social y Ciudadanía, Generalitat de Cataluña.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B., Gómez, L. E., & Schalock, R. L. (2010). Development of an objective instrument to assess quality of life in social services: Reliability and validity in Spain. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(1), 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Schalock, R.L., Verdugo, M.A., & Jenaro, C. (in press). Examining the factor structure and hierarchical nature of the quality of life construct. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

  • Xu, J., Wang, M., Xiang, Y., & Hu, X. (2005). Quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities in China: A cross-culture perspectives study. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 49, 745–749. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00744.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Work on this research was partially supported by a grant (EDU/894/2009)given to the Excellence Group of Research (GR197) by the Junta de Castilla y León (Spain). It was also founded by the Catalan Welfare and Social Services Institute (‘Instituto Catalán de Asistencia y Servicios Sociales’)(ICASS, Generalitat of Catalonia) and the Science and Technology Ministry (R&D Projects, 2009)(PSI2009‐10953).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INICO, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

    Laura E. Gómez & Benito Arias

  2. Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Educación y Trabajo Social, Paseo de Belén, 1, 47011, Valladolid, Spain

    Laura E. Gómez

  3. University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

    Miguel Ángel Verdugo

  4. University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

    Víctor Arias

Authors
  1. Laura E. Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Ángel Verdugo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benito Arias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Víctor Arias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura E. Gómez.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table 3.

Table 3 The gencat scale (Verdugo et al. 2008, 2009)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez, L.E., Verdugo, M.Á., Arias, B. et al. A Comparison of Alternative Models of Individual Quality of Life for Social Service Recipients. Soc Indic Res 101, 109–126 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9639-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9639-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation