Abstract
The ability to integrate information that is separated within a text, such as connecting a character’s action to a goal stated earlier in the text, is a critical factor in narrative comprehension. In the present study, we analyze the ability of 9- and 11-year olds to integrate such information. In addition, we examined the effect of illustrations on integration process by using on-line comprehension measures. Participants read narratives that conveyed a character’s goal early in the text, and an action was described later on that was either consistent or inconsistent with the goal. Narratives were presented either with an illustration that mirrored the situation described in the goal, or without an illustration. The results show that 11-year-olds spent more time on the inconsistent actions than on the consistent actions; in addition, 9-year-olds detected the inconsistency when illustrations were provided. An additional finding was that working memory moderated children’s ability to connect actions and goals. These results suggest that children as young as 9 years form connections between characters’ actions and their goals during text processing, although they need an illustration to keep the goal information activated to detect the inconsistency. Illustrations’ effectiveness was interpreted in terms of extra processing of the characters’ goal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Baddeley (2000) also suggested an additional component of the model, the episodic buffer, which integrates and temporarily stores information from the articulatory loop and the visual-spatial sketchpad.
The authors thank an anonymous reviewer who suggested this issue.
References
Ackerman, B. P. (1984). Storage and processing constraints on integrating story Information in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 64–92. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(84)90019-5.
Ackerman, B. P., & McGraw, M. (1991). Constraints on the causal inferences of children and adults in comprehending stories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 364–394. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(91)90083-5.
Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1459–1468. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.21.6.1459.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 5–28.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
Barnes, M. A., Faulkner, H., Wilkinson, M., & Dennis, M. (2004). Meaning construction and integration in children with hydrocephalus. Brain and Language, 89, 47–56. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00295-5.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004a). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004b). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671.
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26. doi:10.1023/A:1013176309260.
Case, R. (1992). The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Casteel, M. A. (1993). Effects of inference necessity and reading goal on children’s inferential generation. Developmental Psychology, 29, 346–357. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.29.2.346.
Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R, Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores [PROLEC-R, Assessment battery of reading processes]. Madrid: TEA.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170–198). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
Dutke, S., & Rinck, M. (2006). Multimedia learning: Working memory and the learning of word and picture diagrams. Learning and Instruction, 16, 526–537. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.002.
Egidi, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (2006). Readers’ experiences of characters’ goals and actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1322–1329. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1322.
Fletcher, C. R., & Bloom, C. P. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235–244.
Gambrell, L. B., & Jawitz, P. B. (1993). Mental imagery, text illustrations, and children’s story comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(3), 264–276. doi:10.2307/747998.
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40, 177–190. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.177.
Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129–151. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90008-L.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90063-5.
Goldman, S. R., & Varnhagen, C. K. (1986). Memory for embedded and sequential story structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 401–418. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90034-3.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371.
Gyselinck, V., Cornoldi, C., Dubois, V., De Beni, R., & Ehrlich, M. F. (2002). Visuospatial memory and phonological loop in learning from multimedia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 665–685. doi:10.1002/acp.823.
Gyselinck, V., & Tardieu, H. (1999). The role of illustrations in text comprehension: What, when, for whom, and why? In H. Van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 195–218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Huitema, J. S., Dopkins, S., Klin, C. M., & Myers, J. L. (1993). Connecting goals and actions during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1053–1060. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1053.
Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
Levie, W., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 30(4), 195–232.
Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: I. Basic research (pp. 51–85). New York: Springer.
Lutz, M. F., & Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 293–310. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2491.
Lynch, J. S., & van den Broek, P. (2007). Understanding the glue of narrative structure: Children’son- and off-line inferences about characters’ goals. Cognitive Development, 22, 323–340. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.02.002.
Magliano, J. P., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. In H. E. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 219–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49–63. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.88.1.49.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.82.4.715.
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187.
McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2011). The effect of diagrams on online reading processes and memory. Discourse Processes, 48, 69–92. doi:10.1080/01638531003694561.
McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2009). The use of adjunct displays to facilitate comprehension of causal relationships in expository text. Instructional Science, 37, 65–86. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9036-3.
Múñez, D., Orrantia, J., & Rosales, J. (2013). The effect of external representations on compare word problems: Supporting mental model construction. The Journal of Experimental Education. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.715095.
Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139–158. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2498.
Oakhill, J., Hartt, J., & Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18, 657–686. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Pike, M. M., Barnes, M. A., & Barron, R. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 243–255. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.006.
Poynor, D. V., & Morris, R. K. (2003). Inferred goals in narratives: Evidence from self-paced reading, recall, and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 3–9. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.29.1.3.
Radvansky, G. A., & Curiel, J. C. (1998). Narrative comprehension and aging: The fate of completed goal information. Psychology and Aging, 13, 69–79. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.69.
Sadoski, M. (1985). The natural use of imagery in story comprehension and recall: Replication and extension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 658–667. doi:10.2307/747949.
Sánchez, E., García, J. R., & Gonzalez, A. J. (2007). Can differences in the ability to recognize words cease to have and effect under certain reading conditions? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(4), 290–306. doi:10.1177/00222194070400040101.
Singer, M., Andrusiak, P., Reisdorf, P., & Black, N. L. (1992). Individual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory & Cognition, 20, 539–548. doi:10.3758/BF03199586.
Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 1–38. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0001.
Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Suh, S. Y., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279–300. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1015.
Trabasso, T., & Nickels, M. (1992). The development of goal plans of action in the narration of a picture story. Discourse Processes, 15, 249–275. doi:10.1080/01638539209544812.
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90048-8.
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X.
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25. doi:10.1080/01638538909544717.
van den Broek, P. (1989). Causal reasoning and inference making in judging the importance of story statements. Child Development, 60, 286–297. doi:10.2307/1130976.
van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory for narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588). San Diego: Academic Press.
van den Broek, P. (1997). Discovering the cement of the universe: The development of event comprehension from childhood to adulthood. In P. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer, & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events (pp. 321–343). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J. S., Butler, J., White, M. J., et al. (2005a). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. Stahl & S. Paris (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 107–130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
van den Broek, P., & Lorch, R. F. (1993). Network representations of causal relations in memory for narrative texts: Evidence from primed recognition. Discourse Processes, 16, 75–98. doi:10.1080/01638539309544830.
van den Broek, P., Lynch, J. S., Naslund, J., Ievers-Landis, C. E., & Verduin, K. (2003). The development of comprehension of main ideas in narratives: Evidence from the selection of titles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 707–718. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.707.
van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005b). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3902&3_11.
van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1665–1690. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9337-4.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
van Oostendorp, H. E., & Goldman, S. R. (1999). The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wechsler, D. (2005). Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para niños-IV [The Wechsler intelligence scale for children-fourth edition]. Madrid: TEA.
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.123.2.162.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Grant PSI2011-27737 to J. Orrantia from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación in Spain.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orrantia, J., Múñez, D. & Tarín, J. Connecting goals and actions during reading: the role of illustrations. Read Writ 27, 153–170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9437-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9437-4