Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
In the field of positive youth development programs, “empowerment” is used interchangeably with youth activism, leadership, civic participation and self-efficacy. However, few studies have captured what empowerment means to young people in diverse contexts. This article explores how youth define and experience empowerment in youth-led organizations characterized by social justice goals: high school Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs). Through focus group interviews, fifteen youth leaders of GSAs from different regions of California explain what they think empowerment means and how they became empowered through their involvement with the GSA. Youth describe three inter-related dimensions of empowerment: personal empowerment, relational empowerment, and strategic empowerment through having and using knowledge. When these three dimensions are experienced in combination, GSA leaders have the potential for individual and collective empowerment as agents of social change at school. By understanding these youth’s perspectives on the meanings of empowerment, this article clarifies the conceptual arena for future studies of socially marginalized youth and of positive youth development.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Crenshaw, P., Mitchell, W., Bunton, R., & Green, E. (2000). Youth empowerment and youth research: Expertise, subjection, and control. Youth & Policy, 69, 1–16.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dibennedetto, A. (1991). An analysis of youth empowerment through group involvement. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Fields, J., & Russell, S. T. (2005). Queer, sexuality, and gender activism. In L. R. Sherrod, C. A. Flanagan, & R. Kassimir (Eds.), Youth activism: An international encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 512–514). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. In B. Kirshner, J. L. O’Donoghue, & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Youth participation: Improving institutions and communities (Vol. 96, pp. 27–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hefner, K. (1998). Youth rights. Social Policy, 28(3), 60–64.
Herdt, G., & Boxer, A. (1993). Children of horizons. Boston: Beacon Press.
Herdt, G., Russell, S. T., Sweat, J., & Marzullo, M. (2007). Sexual inequality, youth empowerment, and the GSA: A community study in California. In N. Teunis & G. Herdt (Eds.), Sexual inequalities (pp. 233–252). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Huebner, A. J. (1998). Examining “empowerment”: A how-to guide for the youth development professional, Journal of Extension, Vol. 36.
Inkelas, K. K. (2004). Does participation in ethnic cocurricular activities facilitate a sense of ethnic awareness and understanding? A study of Asian Pacific American undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 285–301. CrossRef
Kim, S., Crutchfield, C., Williams, C., & Hepler, N. (1998). Toward a new paradigm in substance abuse and other problem behavior prevention for youth: Youth development and empowerment approach. Journal of Drug Education, 28(1), 1–17. PubMed
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Le Bosse, Y., Lavallee, M., Lacerte, D., Dube, N., Nadeau, J., Porcher, E., et al. (1998). Is community participation empirical evidence for psychological empowerment? A distinction between passive and active participation. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 59–82.
Miceli, M. (2005). Standing out, standing together: The social and political impact of Gay-Straightalliances. New York: Routledge.
O’Donoghue, J. L., Kirshner, B., & McLaughlin, M. (2002). Introduction: Moving youth participation forward. In B. Kirshner, J. L. O’Donoghue, & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Youth participation: Improving institutions and communities (Vol. 96, pp. 15–26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Prilletensky, I. (2003). Understanding and resisting and overcoming oppression: Toward psychopolitical validity. Amercian Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 195–200. CrossRef
Speer, P. W. (2000). Intrapersonal and interactional empowerment: Implications for theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 51–61. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200001)28:1<51::AID-JCOP6>3.0.CO;2-6. CrossRef
Spreitzer, G. M., De Janasz, S. C., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 511–526. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<511::AID-JOB900>3.0.CO;2-L. CrossRef
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tatum, B. D. (1999). Which way do we go? Leading for diversity in the new frontier. The Journal of Negro Education, 68, 550–554. CrossRef
Tierney, J., Dowd, T., & O’Kane, S. (1993). Empowering aggressive youth to change. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 2(1), 41–45.
Uribe, V. (1994). Project 10: A school-based outreach to gay and lesbian youth. High School Journal, 77, 108. Special issue.
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–64). New York: Kluwer.
Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20(6), 707–727.
- Youth Empowerment and High School Gay-Straight Alliances
Stephen T. Russell
- Springer US