Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Original Paper

“Who Cares for the Children?” Lessons from a Global Perspective of Child Care Policy

Auteurs: Maegan Lokteff, Kathleen W. Piercy

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 1/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We present the argument that the meaning of child care and the policies that address it are explicitly linked with national ideologies, work force participation, economic success, and child outcomes. The relationship between family and child care policies is cyclical in nature, with a nation’s ideology and vision of family often driving child care policies, while child care policies in turn drive and support a nation’s ideology. We examine the interrelatedness of child care policy and national ideologies of family in selected industrialized countries. Specifically, this paper first defines child care policy and discusses the national ideological frameworks that provide the impetus for child care policy formation and implementation. Second, the paper explores current child care policies and their connection to the historical and political context of several countries within, including France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Belgium, the Nordic countries, and the United States. Lastly, recommendations are offered for the future of child care policy development with specific recommendations for child care policy development in the United States.
Literatuur
go back to reference Adema, W., & Whiteford, P. (2008). Matching work and family commitments: Australian outcomes in a comparative perspective. Family Matters, 80, 9–18. Adema, W., & Whiteford, P. (2008). Matching work and family commitments: Australian outcomes in a comparative perspective. Family Matters, 80, 9–18.
go back to reference Allen, S. F. (2003). Working parents with young children: Cross national comparisons of policy and programmes in three countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 12, 261–273.CrossRef Allen, S. F. (2003). Working parents with young children: Cross national comparisons of policy and programmes in three countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 12, 261–273.CrossRef
go back to reference Bogenschneider, K. (2000). Has family policy come of age? A decade review of the state of U.S. family policy in the 1990’s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1136–1159.CrossRef Bogenschneider, K. (2000). Has family policy come of age? A decade review of the state of U.S. family policy in the 1990’s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1136–1159.CrossRef
go back to reference Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. (2010). Family policy: Becoming a field of inquiry and a subfield of social policy. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 783–803.CrossRef Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. (2010). Family policy: Becoming a field of inquiry and a subfield of social policy. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 783–803.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, M. F., & Powell, R. (2003). The international convention on the rights of the child: A catalyst for innovative child care policies. Human Rights Quarterly, 25, 689–719.CrossRef Davis, M. F., & Powell, R. (2003). The international convention on the rights of the child: A catalyst for innovative child care policies. Human Rights Quarterly, 25, 689–719.CrossRef
go back to reference Durfee, A., & Meyers, M. K. (2006). Who gets what from government? Distributional consequences of child care assistance policies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 733–748.CrossRef Durfee, A., & Meyers, M. K. (2006). Who gets what from government? Distributional consequences of child care assistance policies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 733–748.CrossRef
go back to reference Durst, A. (2005). “Of women, by women, for women”: The day nursery movement in the progressive era United States. The Journal of Social History, 39(1), 141–159.CrossRef Durst, A. (2005). “Of women, by women, for women”: The day nursery movement in the progressive era United States. The Journal of Social History, 39(1), 141–159.CrossRef
go back to reference Edin, K., & Kissane, R. J. (2010). Poverty and the American family: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 460–479.CrossRef Edin, K., & Kissane, R. J. (2010). Poverty and the American family: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 460–479.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellingsater, A. L., & Gulbrandsen, L. (2007). Closing the child care gap: The interaction of child care provision and Mothers’ agency in Norway. Journal of Social Policy, 36(4), 646–669. doi:10.1017/S0047279407001225. Ellingsater, A. L., & Gulbrandsen, L. (2007). Closing the child care gap: The interaction of child care provision and Mothers’ agency in Norway. Journal of Social Policy, 36(4), 646–669. doi:10.​1017/​S004727940700122​5.
go back to reference Fagnani, J. (2007). Family policies in France and Germany: Sisters or distant cousins? Community, Work, and Family, 10(1), 39–56.CrossRef Fagnani, J. (2007). Family policies in France and Germany: Sisters or distant cousins? Community, Work, and Family, 10(1), 39–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Haavind, H., & Magnusson, E. (2005). Feminism and psychology in the context of Nordic welfare ideologies and policies: Editors introduction. Feminism and Psychology, 15(2), 123–126. doi:10.1177/0959-353505051716.CrossRef Haavind, H., & Magnusson, E. (2005). Feminism and psychology in the context of Nordic welfare ideologies and policies: Editors introduction. Feminism and Psychology, 15(2), 123–126. doi:10.​1177/​0959-353505051716.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, S. (2008). Women and family friendly policies in the Korean government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 463–476.CrossRef Kim, S. (2008). Women and family friendly policies in the Korean government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 463–476.CrossRef
go back to reference Kremer, M. (2006). The politics of ideals of care: Danish and Flemish child care policy compared. International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 13(2), 261–285. 10.1093/sp/jxj009.CrossRef Kremer, M. (2006). The politics of ideals of care: Danish and Flemish child care policy compared. International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 13(2), 261–285. 10.1093/sp/jxj009.CrossRef
go back to reference Lambert, P. A. (2007). The political economy of post war family policy in Japan: Economic imperatives and electoral incentives. Journal of Japanese Studies, 33(1), 1–29.CrossRef Lambert, P. A. (2007). The political economy of post war family policy in Japan: Economic imperatives and electoral incentives. Journal of Japanese Studies, 33(1), 1–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Lewis, J. (2008). Child care policies and the politics of choice. The Political Quarterly, 79(4), 499–507.CrossRef Lewis, J. (2008). Child care policies and the politics of choice. The Political Quarterly, 79(4), 499–507.CrossRef
go back to reference Lewis, J., Campbell, M., & Huerta, C. (2008). Patterns of paid and unpaid work in Western Europe: Gender, commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(1), 21–37. doi:10.1177/0958928707084450.CrossRef Lewis, J., Campbell, M., & Huerta, C. (2008). Patterns of paid and unpaid work in Western Europe: Gender, commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(1), 21–37. doi:10.​1177/​0958928707084450​.CrossRef
go back to reference Martin, C. (2007). A baby friendly state: Lessons from the French case. Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law, 9, 203–210. Martin, C. (2007). A baby friendly state: Lessons from the French case. Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law, 9, 203–210.
go back to reference Murphy-Lawless, J. (2000). Changing women’s lives: Child care policy in Ireland. Feminist Economics, 6(1), 89–94.CrossRef Murphy-Lawless, J. (2000). Changing women’s lives: Child care policy in Ireland. Feminist Economics, 6(1), 89–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Ono, K. (2009). Civil society, state, and institutions for young children in modern Japan. History of Education Quarterly, 49(2), 170–181.CrossRef Ono, K. (2009). Civil society, state, and institutions for young children in modern Japan. History of Education Quarterly, 49(2), 170–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Palley, E. (2010). Who cares for children? Why we are where we are with American child care policy. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 155–163.CrossRef Palley, E. (2010). Who cares for children? Why we are where we are with American child care policy. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 155–163.CrossRef
go back to reference Pedersen, D. E., Minnotte, K. L., Kiger, G., & Mannon, S. E. (2009). Workplace policy and environment, family role quality, and positive family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 30, 80–89. doi:10.1007/s10834-008-9140-9.CrossRef Pedersen, D. E., Minnotte, K. L., Kiger, G., & Mannon, S. E. (2009). Workplace policy and environment, family role quality, and positive family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 30, 80–89. doi:10.​1007/​s10834-008-9140-9.CrossRef
go back to reference Rigby, E., Ryan, R. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2007). Child care quality in different state policy contexts. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 887–907. doi:10.1002/pam.20290.CrossRef Rigby, E., Ryan, R. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2007). Child care quality in different state policy contexts. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 887–907. doi:10.​1002/​pam.​20290.CrossRef
go back to reference Sung, S. (2003). Women reconciling paid and unpaid work in a Confucian state: The case of South Korea. Social Policy and Administration, 37(4), 342–360.CrossRef Sung, S. (2003). Women reconciling paid and unpaid work in a Confucian state: The case of South Korea. Social Policy and Administration, 37(4), 342–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Szelewa, D., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of child care in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115–131.CrossRef Szelewa, D., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of child care in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115–131.CrossRef
go back to reference Vanderbroeck, M. (2006). The persistent gap between education and care: A ‘history of the present’ research on Belgian child care provision and policy. Paedagogica Historica, 42(3), 363–383.CrossRef Vanderbroeck, M. (2006). The persistent gap between education and care: A ‘history of the present’ research on Belgian child care provision and policy. Paedagogica Historica, 42(3), 363–383.CrossRef
go back to reference Vesley, C. K., & Anderson, E. A. (2009). Child care and development fund: A policy analysis. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 36(1), 39–59. Vesley, C. K., & Anderson, E. A. (2009). Child care and development fund: A policy analysis. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 36(1), 39–59.
go back to reference White, L. A. (2009). Explaining differences in child care policy development in France and the USA: Norms, frames, and programmatic ideas. International Political Science Review, 30(4), 385–404. doi:10.1177/0192512109340055.CrossRef White, L. A. (2009). Explaining differences in child care policy development in France and the USA: Norms, frames, and programmatic ideas. International Political Science Review, 30(4), 385–404. doi:10.​1177/​0192512109340055​.CrossRef
go back to reference Won, S., & Pascall, G. (2004). A Confucian war over childcare? Practice and policy in childcare and their implications for understanding the Korean gender regime. Social Policy and Administration, 38(3), 270–289.CrossRef Won, S., & Pascall, G. (2004). A Confucian war over childcare? Practice and policy in childcare and their implications for understanding the Korean gender regime. Social Policy and Administration, 38(3), 270–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Worlich, K. (2008). The excess demand for subsidized childcare in Germany. Applied Economics, 40(10), 1217–1228.CrossRef Worlich, K. (2008). The excess demand for subsidized childcare in Germany. Applied Economics, 40(10), 1217–1228.CrossRef
go back to reference Zigler, E., Marsland, K., & Lord, H. (2009). The tragedy of child care in America. New Haven: Yale University Press. Zigler, E., Marsland, K., & Lord, H. (2009). The tragedy of child care in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
“Who Cares for the Children?” Lessons from a Global Perspective of Child Care Policy
Auteurs
Maegan Lokteff
Kathleen W. Piercy
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9467-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2012

Journal of Child and Family Studies 1/2012 Naar de uitgave