Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
It is well known that victims of bullying could become a bullying perpetrator later on. However, there are some cases where victims do not become bullies after being bullied. What constitutes the differences between the two groups, who show different response strategies despite the similar experiences of victimization, is the main question that the current study poses. Based on the threatened egotism theory, the current longitudinal study postulates that there could be possible moderating effects of self-esteem in the relationship between prior bullying victimization and subsequent bullying perpetration. The data was drawn from 3,660 Korean secondary students (51.5% male) in the Seoul Education Longitudinal Study for 2 waves (7th to 8th grades). The results from structural equation modeling indicated that there is a significant interaction effect between bullying victimization and self-esteem in the 7th grade, in prediction to bullying perpetration in the 8th grade, after controlling for the prior level of bullying victimization and perpetration experiences, demographic and background characteristics (i.e., gender and family income), students’ school-environmental factor (i.e., perceived seriousness of school bullying), individual factor (i.e., self-control) and family-environmental factor (i.e., parent–child relationship). Students with higher self-esteem were the most likely to engage in future bullying perpetration in response to bullying victimization, while the students with lower self-esteem were the least likely to engage in future bullying perpetration. Educators who examine adolescents’ social problems should pay closer attention to self-esteem, as well as their bullying and victimization experiences, in order to provide appropriate interventions.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88. CrossRef
Arbuckle, J. L (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In: In G. A. Marcoulides, R. E. Schumacker, (eds.) Advanced structural equationmodeling: Issues and techniques. (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Averdijk, M., Van Genlder, J. L., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2016). Violence begets violence … but how? A decision-making perspective on the victim-offender. Criminology, 54(2), 282–306. CrossRef
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Barker, E. D., Arseneault, L., Brendgen, M., Fontaine, N., & Maughan, B. (2008). Joint development of bullying and victimization in adolescence: relations to delinquency and self-harm. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(9), 1030–1038.
Boulton, M. J., Smith, P. K., & Cowie, H. (2010). Short-term longitudinal relationships between children’s peer victimization/bullying experiences and self-perceptions evidence for reciprocity. School Psychology International, 31(3), 296–311. CrossRef
Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Terwogt, M. M., & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school‐age children: stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11(3), 332–345. CrossRef
Catherine, P. B., & Renee, M. J. (2011). The social context of bullying and peer victimization: an introduction to the special issue. Journal of School Violence, 10(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.557145. CrossRef
Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65–83. CrossRef
Cho, S., & Wooldredge, J. (2016). The link between juvenile offending and victimization: Sources of change over time in bullying victimization risk among South Korean adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 71, 119–129. CrossRef
Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Dmitrieva, J., & Farruggia, S. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: do they matter? Personality and Individual differences, 35(6), 1241–1254. CrossRef
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes on covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structual Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef
Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A. R., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: a review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(1), 16–26. CrossRef
Jose, P. E., Kljakovic, M., Scheib, E., & Notter, O. (2012). The joint development of traditional bullying and victimization with cyber bullying and victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(2), 301–309. CrossRef
Kamphaus, R. W., & Frick, P. J. (1996). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent personality and behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Keith, T. Z. (2014). Multiple regression and beyond: an introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kort-Butler, L. A. (2010). Experienced and vicarious victimization: do social support and self-esteem prevent delinquent responses? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 496–505. CrossRef
Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2012). The relationship between bullying, victimization, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and empathy among preadolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 41–58. CrossRef
Marsh, H. W., Parada, R. H., Craven, G., & Finger, L. (2004). In the looking glass: a reciprocal effects model elucidating the complex nature of bullying, psychological determinants and the central role of self-concept. In C. E. Sanders & G. D. Phye (Eds.), Bullying implications for the classroom (pp. 63–135). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. CrossRef
Nansel, T. R., Haynie, D. L., & Simonsmorton, B. G. (2003). The association of bullying and victimization with middle school adjustment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 45–61. CrossRef
Nickerson, A, Mele, D., & Osborne-Oliver, K. M. (2010). Parent–child relationships and bullying. In: S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, D. L. Espelage, (eds.) Handbook of bullying in schools:An international perspective . (pp. 187–197). New York, NY: Routledge.
Olweus, D. (2007). The Olweus bullying questionnaire. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Pitts, S. C., West, S. G., & Tein, J. Y. (1996). Longitudinal measurement models in evaluation research: examining stability and change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19(4), 333–350. CrossRef
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964. CrossRef
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Salmivalli, C. (2001). Feeling good about oneself, being bad to others? Remarks on self-esteem, hostility, and aggressive behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(4), 375–393. CrossRef
Schwartz, D., Proctor, L. J., & Chien, D. H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147–174). New York/London: The Guilford Press.
Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38(152), 735–747. PubMed
Seoul Education Research & Information Institute. (2011), SELS 2010 User’s Manual. (Report No. 2011-17). Retrieved from Seoul Education Research & Information Institute website: http://www.serii.re.kr/board/viw.do?method=boardview&mcode=S021&seq=14501&listType=.
Tsaousis, I. (2016). The relationship of self-esteem to bullying perpetration and peer victimization among schoolchildren and adolescents: a meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 186–199. CrossRef
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157–176. CrossRef
- Who Becomes a Bullying Perpetrator After the Experience of Bullying Victimization? The Moderating Role of Self-esteem
- Springer US
- Journal of Youth and Adolescence
A Multidisciplinary Research Publication
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601