Top

Gepubliceerd in:

09-03-2020 | Empirical Research

Who Are Popular, Liked, and Admired? Longitudinal Associations between Three Social Status and Academic-Social Behavior

Auteur: Huiyoung Shin

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 9/2020

Abstract

Peer social status has been identified as central to youth’s development. Whereas the majority of studies has focused on popularity and likability, recent efforts emphasize the need to consider admiration which captures how much peers respect and want to be like particular youth. The current study examined the overlap between the three types of social status (popularity, likability, and admiration), and investigated concurrent and longitudinal associations between social status and academic-social behavior. At each of 2 waves (five months apart), 736 South Korean youth (M_age = 12.5; 53% girls) made behavioral and social status nominations of their peers in classes. Popularity, likability, and admiration were only weakly associated with each other, and each social status was characterized by distinct behavioral features. Specifically, admiration was most strongly associated with academic engagement and prosocial behavior. Cross-lagged models revealed a bidirectional relationship between academic engagement and admiration. Academic engagement led to gains in admiration and admiration led to increases in academic engagement. The findings emphasize the need to focus on admiration to support youth’s positive adjustment.

vorige artikel Explaining Health Disparities between Heterosexual and LGB Adolescents by Integrating the Minority Stress and Psychological Mediation Frameworks: Findings from the TRAILS Study

volgende artikel A Multilevel Analysis of the Importance of School Climate for the Trajectories of Students’ Self-concept and Self-esteem Throughout the Middle School Transition

Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2007). Peer-perceived admiration and social likability: contextual correlates of positive peer regard among suburban and urban adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(1), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00514.x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRef

Bukowski, W. M., Sippola, L. K., & Newcomb, A. F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction of same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 255–263.CrossRef

Bukowski, W. M., Gauze, C., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A. F. (1993). Differences and consistency between same-sex and other-sex peer relationships during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.25.CrossRef

Chen, X., Fu, R., & Leng, L. (2014). Culture and developmental psycho-pathology. In M. Lewis & K. D. Rudolph (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (pp. 225–241). New York, NY: Springer U.S.CrossRef

Cillessen, A. H., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: a growth curve modelling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 935–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005.PubMedCrossRef

Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.PubMedCrossRef

Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x.CrossRef

Cillessen, A. H. N., & van den Berg, Y. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558406293966.CrossRef

Dijkstra, J. K., & Gest, S. D. (2015). Peer norm salience for academic achievement, prosocial behavior, and bullying: implications for adolescent school experiences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614524303.CrossRef

Graham, S., Taylor, A. Z., & Hudley, C. (1998). Exploring achievement values among ethnic minority early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 606–620.CrossRef

Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.CrossRef

LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (1999). Children’s interpersonal perceptions as a function of sociometric and peer-perceived popularity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(2), 225–242.CrossRef

LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635.PubMedCrossRef

LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x.CrossRef

Li, J. (2003). The core of Confucian learning. The American Psychologist, 58(2), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.146.PubMedCrossRef

Merten, D. E. (1996). Visibility and vulnerability: responses to rejection by nonaggressive junior high school boys. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(1), 5–26.CrossRef

Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course- persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674.PubMedCrossRef

North, E. A., Ryan, A., Cortina, K., & Brass, N. R. (2019). Social status and classroom behavior in math and science during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0949-8.PubMedCrossRef

Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002001.CrossRef

Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. V. (2006). They’re cool: social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15(2), 175–204.CrossRef

Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. APA: educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors, K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan. (Editors in Chief), 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-015.

Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378–387.PubMedCrossRef

Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peers interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. Lerner (Series Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 571–645). New York, NY: Wiley.

Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics and teachers. In W. B. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 637–646). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Shin, H. (2017a). Friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression, pro-social behavior, and social status: the moderating role of gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2305–2320.PubMedCrossRef

Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014a). Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2462–2472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037922.PubMedCrossRef

Taylor, A. Z., & Graham, S. (2007). An examination of the relationship between achievement values and perceptions of barriers among low-SES African American and Latino students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 52–54.CrossRef

Tseng, W. L., Banny, A. M., Kawabata, Y., Crick, N. R., & Gau, S. S. F. (2013). A cross-lagged structural equation model of relational aggression, physical aggression, and peer status in a Chinese culture. Aggressive Behavior, 39(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21480.PubMedCrossRef

Véronneau, M. H., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dishion, T. J., & Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019816.PubMedCrossRef

Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Zhang, Z., Pomerantz, E. M., Qin, L., Logis, H., Ryan, A. M., & Wang, M. (2018). Characteristics of likability, perceived popularity, and admiration in the early adolescent peer system in the United States and China. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1568–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000544.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Who Are Popular, Liked, and Admired? Longitudinal Associations between Three Social Status and Academic-Social Behavior
Auteur: Huiyoung Shin
Publicatiedatum: 09-03-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01222-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2020

Correction to: School Security Measures and Longitudinal Trends in Adolescents’ Experiences of Victimization

Absenteeism in the First Decade of Education Forecasts Civic Engagement and Educational and Socioeconomic Prospects in Young Adulthood

Discrimination, the Model Minority Stereotype, and Peer Relationships Across the High School Years

Differences and Similarities between Perpetrators of Ethnic and Non-Ethnicity-Based Victimization

Colleen E. Carney: Goodnight Mind for Teens: Skills to Help You Quiet Noisy Thoughts and Get the Sleep You Need

Does Organizing Mentor-Mentee Matches into Small Groups Enhance Treatment Effects in a Site-Based Mentoring Program for Adolescents? Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial