Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2020

03-07-2018 | Original Article

When task sharing reduces interference: evidence for division-of-labour in Stroop-like tasks

Auteurs: Roberta Sellaro, Barbara Treccani, Roberto Cubelli

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Performing a task with another person may either enhance or reduce the interference produced by task-irrelevant information. In three experiments, we employed the joint version of a Stroop-like task (i.e., the picture–word interference—PWI—task) to investigate some of the task features that seem to be critical in determining the effect of task-irrelevant information when the task is shared between two individuals. Participants were asked to perform a PWI task, which required to name a picture while ignoring a distractor word, first individually (in a baseline block of trials) and then co-acting with an alleged partner. Results showed that, compared to the baseline and to a condition in which participants continued to perform the PWI task individually, the belief of co-acting with another individual who was thought to be in charge of the distractor words suppressed the semantic interference effect when these words were in case alternation letters (e.g., “mOuSe”). Conversely, the semantic interference effect persisted when the co-actor was thought to be in charge of the same task as the participant, that is, the co-actor was thought to respond to the pictures. These results are accounted for by assuming that, when the participant knows that another person is in charge of the task-irrelevant information, a division-of-labour between participant and co-actor can be established. Such a division-of-labour may provide the participant with a strategy to oppose the semantic interference effect. Our findings, therefore, suggest that sharing a task with another person in charge of potentially interfering information can enable people to filter out this information from their own task representation.
Literatuur
go back to reference Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–40). New-York: Academic Press. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–40). New-York: Academic Press.
go back to reference Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI (pp. 549–576). Cambridge: MIT Press. Duncan, J. (1996). Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI (pp. 549–576). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and theory: Advances in research and theory (pp. 59–101). Burlington: Academic Press.CrossRef Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and theory: Advances in research and theory (pp. 59–101). Burlington: Academic Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 503–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503.CrossRef Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture–word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 503–535. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0278-7393.​33.​3.​503.CrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Wahn, B., Keshava, A., Sinnett, S., Kingstone, A., & König, P. (2017). Audiovisual integration is affected by performing a task jointly. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Austin, TX), pp. 1296–1301. Wahn, B., Keshava, A., Sinnett, S., Kingstone, A., & König, P. (2017). Audiovisual integration is affected by performing a task jointly. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Austin, TX), pp. 1296–1301.
Metagegevens
Titel
When task sharing reduces interference: evidence for division-of-labour in Stroop-like tasks
Auteurs
Roberta Sellaro
Barbara Treccani
Roberto Cubelli
Publicatiedatum
03-07-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1044-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2020

Psychological Research 2/2020 Naar de uitgave