Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2021

19-06-2020 | Original Article

When more is less in financial decision-making: financial literacy magnifies framing effects

Auteurs: Vânia Moreira Costa, Nuno A. De Sá Teixeira, Ana Cordeiro Santos, Eduardo Santos

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

In recent years, the financial world has become more complex and intricate. In this context, numeracy and, particularly, financial literacy, are seen as paramount in providing consumers with the knowledge and confidence required to take part in financial markets. Despite some indicative empirical findings, it is still to be ascertained how the two competences differentially contribute to the quality of decision-making in financial contexts. Furthermore, it is still unknown to what degree financial literacy and numeracy, taken as relevant mind-ware for financial decision-making, are effective in guarding against well-documented biases such as loss aversion and framing effects. This study aims to clarify these issues by employing an experimental task, conceived as an approximation to real-world decision-making involving the sale of shares. Our results suggest that numeracy and financial literacy affect decision-making differently in a pattern that, in part, runs counter to conventional economic theory. The data indicate that numeracy promotes a pattern of choices closer to economic rationality, while financial literacy can prove counterproductive and may amplify cognitive biases, namely framing effects and loss aversion. The outcomes are interpreted in light of dual-process theories, and the political implications discussed.

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Voetnoten
1
In the present paper, we will take maximization of the excepted value as the normatively correct strategy, mostly due to its straightforward calculation and interpretation. For the most part, our conclusions would be unchanged if Expected Utility was considered instead (with the added issue that a utility function would have to be assumed), as the latter should be a monotonously increasing function of the former (Von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1947).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486–498. CrossRef Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486–498. CrossRef
go back to reference Bank of Portugal. (2015). Survey on the Financial Literacy of the Portuguese Population. Lisbon: National Council of Financial Supervisors. Bank of Portugal. (2015). Survey on the Financial Literacy of the Portuguese Population. Lisbon: National Council of Financial Supervisors.
go back to reference Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 773–806. CrossRef Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 773–806. CrossRef
go back to reference Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. American Economic Review, 91(1), 79–98. CrossRef Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. American Economic Review, 91(1), 79–98. CrossRef
go back to reference Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effect of financial incentives. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1–3), 7–42. CrossRef Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effect of financial incentives. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1–3), 7–42. CrossRef
go back to reference Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37(1), 47–59. CrossRef Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37(1), 47–59. CrossRef
go back to reference Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aïte, A., Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12(5), 926–931. PubMedCrossRef Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aïte, A., Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12(5), 926–931. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chater, N., Huck, S., & Inderst, R. (2010). Consumer decision-making in retail investment services: A behavioural economics perspective. Report to the European Commission Directorate-General Health and Consumers (SANCO), Brussels. Chater, N., Huck, S., & Inderst, R. (2010). Consumer decision-making in retail investment services: A behavioural economics perspective. Report to the European Commission Directorate-General Health and Consumers (SANCO), Brussels.
go back to reference Choi, J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2005). Are Empowerment and Education Enough? Under-diversification in 401(k) Plans. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 151–198. CrossRef Choi, J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2005). Are Empowerment and Education Enough? Under-diversification in 401(k) Plans. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 151–198. CrossRef
go back to reference Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making un-der risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision-Making, 4, 20–33. Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making un-der risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision-Making, 4, 20–33.
go back to reference Crotty, J. (2009). Structural causes of the global financial crisis: A critical assessment of the new financial architecture. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 563–580. CrossRef Crotty, J. (2009). Structural causes of the global financial crisis: A critical assessment of the new financial architecture. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 563–580. CrossRef
go back to reference de Bassa Scheresberg, C. (2013). Financial literacy and financial behavior among young adults: Evidence and implications. Numeracy, 6(2), 5. CrossRef de Bassa Scheresberg, C. (2013). Financial literacy and financial behavior among young adults: Evidence and implications. Numeracy, 6(2), 5. CrossRef
go back to reference De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313, 684–687. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Diacon, S., & Hasseldine, J. (2007). Framing effects and risk perception: The effect of prior performance presentation format on investment fund choice. Journal of Economy Psychology, 28, 31–52. CrossRef Diacon, S., & Hasseldine, J. (2007). Framing effects and risk perception: The effect of prior performance presentation format on investment fund choice. Journal of Economy Psychology, 28, 31–52. CrossRef
go back to reference Disney, R., & Gathergood, J. (2013). Financial literacy and consumer credit portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2246–2254. CrossRef Disney, R., & Gathergood, J. (2013). Financial literacy and consumer credit portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2246–2254. CrossRef
go back to reference Epley, N., Mak, D., & Idson, L. C. (2006). Bonus or rebate? The impact of income framing on spending and saving: Erratum. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(4), 407. CrossRef Epley, N., Mak, D., & Idson, L. C. (2006). Bonus or rebate? The impact of income framing on spending and saving: Erratum. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(4), 407. CrossRef
go back to reference Evans, J. S., & B. T., (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454–459. PubMedCrossRef Evans, J. S., & B. T., (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454–459. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual-process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 313–326. CrossRef Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual-process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 313–326. CrossRef
go back to reference Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. PubMedCrossRef Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fernandes, D., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2014). Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management Science, 60(8), 1861–1883. CrossRef Fernandes, D., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2014). Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management Science, 60(8), 1861–1883. CrossRef
go back to reference Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42. CrossRef Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42. CrossRef
go back to reference Garcia-Retamero, R., Sobków, A., Petrova, D., Garrido, D., & Traczyk, J. (2019). Numeracy and risk literacy: What have we learned so far? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22(e10), 1–11. Garcia-Retamero, R., Sobków, A., Petrova, D., Garrido, D., & Traczyk, J. (2019). Numeracy and risk literacy: What have we learned so far? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22(e10), 1–11.
go back to reference Grether, D. M., & Plot, C. R. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69(4), 623–638. Grether, D. M., & Plot, C. R. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69(4), 623–638.
go back to reference Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 83–451. Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 83–451.
go back to reference Jappelli, T., & Padula, M. (2013). Investment in financial literacy and saving decisions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(8), 2779–2792. CrossRef Jappelli, T., & Padula, M. (2013). Investment in financial literacy and saving decisions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(8), 2779–2792. CrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2007). Frames and brains: Elicitation and control of response tendencies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 45–46. PubMedCrossRef Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2007). Frames and brains: Elicitation and control of response tendencies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 45–46. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. CrossRef Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. CrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
go back to reference Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In D. Gilovich & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In D. Gilovich & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–262. CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–262. CrossRef
go back to reference Kirsch, I., Kader, B., Jensen, G. V., & Kopher, W. (2002). Adult Literacy in American US Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics Kirsch, I., Kader, B., Jensen, G. V., & Kopher, W. (2002). Adult Literacy in American US Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics
go back to reference Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1973). Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101(1), 16–20. CrossRef Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1973). Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101(1), 16–20. CrossRef
go back to reference Lipkus, I. M., Samsaand, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44. PubMedCrossRef Lipkus, I. M., Samsaand, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lusardi, A. (2012). Numeracy financial literacy and financial decision-making. Numeracy, 5(1), 1–12. CrossRef Lusardi, A. (2012). Numeracy financial literacy and financial decision-making. Numeracy, 5(1), 1–12. CrossRef
go back to reference Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2007a). Baby boomer retirement security: The roles of planning, financial literacy and housing wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(1), 205–224. CrossRef Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2007a). Baby boomer retirement security: The roles of planning, financial literacy and housing wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(1), 205–224. CrossRef
go back to reference Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2007b). Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: Evidence and implications for financial education. Business Economics, 42(1), 35–44. CrossRef Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2007b). Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: Evidence and implications for financial education. Business Economics, 42(1), 35–44. CrossRef
go back to reference Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2011). Financial Literacy and Retirement Planning in the United States. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(4), 509–525. CrossRef Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2011). Financial Literacy and Retirement Planning in the United States. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(4), 509–525. CrossRef
go back to reference McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259–1262. CrossRef McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259–1262. CrossRef
go back to reference Moore, D. (2003). Survey of Financial Literacy in Washington State: Knowledge, Behavior, Attitudes, and Experiences. Washington State University, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center: Technical Report 03-39. Moore, D. (2003). Survey of Financial Literacy in Washington State: Knowledge, Behavior, Attitudes, and Experiences. Washington State University, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center: Technical Report 03-39.
go back to reference O’Connell, A. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of financial education programmes. OECD Journal General Papers, 3, 9–51. O’Connell, A. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of financial education programmes. OECD Journal General Papers, 3, 9–51.
go back to reference OECD. (2005). Improving financial literacy: analysis of issues and policies. Paris: OECD Publishing. CrossRef OECD. (2005). Improving financial literacy: analysis of issues and policies. Paris: OECD Publishing. CrossRef
go back to reference OECD. (2009). Financial literacy and consumer protection: overlooked aspects of the crisis. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD. (2009). Financial literacy and consumer protection: overlooked aspects of the crisis. Paris: OECD Publishing.
go back to reference OECD. (2017). G20/OECD INFE report on adult financial literacy in G20 COUNTRIES. Par-is: OECD Publishing. OECD. (2017). G20/OECD INFE report on adult financial literacy in G20 COUNTRIES. Par-is: OECD Publishing.
go back to reference OECD & INFE. (2014). OECD/INFE progress report on financial education. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD & INFE. (2014). OECD/INFE progress report on financial education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
go back to reference OECD & INFE. (2016). International survey of adult financial literacy competencies. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD & INFE. (2016). International survey of adult financial literacy competencies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
go back to reference Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2(10), 1–8. Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2(10), 1–8.
go back to reference Peters, E., & Levin, I. P. (2008). Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 435–448. Peters, E., & Levin, I. P. (2008). Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 435–448.
go back to reference Peters, E. (2012). Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Psychological Science, 21(1), 31–35. Peters, E. (2012). Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Psychological Science, 21(1), 31–35.
go back to reference Peters, E., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Mertz, C. K. (2008). Intuitive numbers guide decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(8), 619–635. Peters, E., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Mertz, C. K. (2008). Intuitive numbers guide decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(8), 619–635.
go back to reference Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413. PubMedCrossRef Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 89–107. CrossRef Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 89–107. CrossRef
go back to reference Sanford, A. J., Fay, N., Stewart, A., & Moxey, L. (2002). Perspective in statements of quantity, with implications for consumer psychology. Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–134. PubMedCrossRef Sanford, A. J., Fay, N., Stewart, A., & Moxey, L. (2002). Perspective in statements of quantity, with implications for consumer psychology. Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–134. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Santos, A. C. (2017). Cultivating the self-reliant and responsible individual: the material culture of financial literacy. New Political Economy, 22(4), 410–422. CrossRef Santos, A. C. (2017). Cultivating the self-reliant and responsible individual: the material culture of financial literacy. New Political Economy, 22(4), 410–422. CrossRef
go back to reference Skagerlund, K., Lind, T., Strömbäck, C., Tinghög, G., & Västfjäll, D. (2018). Financial literacy and the role of numeracy: how individuals’ attitude and affinity with numbers influence financial literacy. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 74, 18–25. CrossRef Skagerlund, K., Lind, T., Strömbäck, C., Tinghög, G., & Västfjäll, D. (2018). Financial literacy and the role of numeracy: how individuals’ attitude and affinity with numbers influence financial literacy. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 74, 18–25. CrossRef
go back to reference Standard & Poor’s (2015). Financial Literacy around the World: Insights from the Standard & Poor's Ratings Services. City: Global Financial Literacy Survey. Standard & Poor’s (2015). Financial Literacy around the World: Insights from the Standard & Poor's Ratings Services. City: Global Financial Literacy Survey.
go back to reference Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349–385. PubMedCrossRef Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349–385. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726. CrossRef Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726. CrossRef
go back to reference Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011). The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models. Developmental Review, 31, 103–118. CrossRef Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011). The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models. Developmental Review, 31, 103–118. CrossRef
go back to reference Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2016). The rationality quotient (RQ): Toward a test of rational thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2016). The rationality quotient (RQ): Toward a test of rational thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Sutherland, R. (1992). Some unanswered questions on the teaching and learning of algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(3), 40–46. Sutherland, R. (1992). Some unanswered questions on the teaching and learning of algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(3), 40–46.
go back to reference Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. PubMedCrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278. CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278. CrossRef
go back to reference Van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Finance Economics, 10(2), 449–472. CrossRef Van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Finance Economics, 10(2), 449–472. CrossRef
go back to reference Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Weller, J. A., Dieckmann, N. F., Tusler, M., Mertz, C. K., Burns, W. J., & Peters, E. (2013). Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 198–212. PubMedCrossRef Weller, J. A., Dieckmann, N. F., Tusler, M., Mertz, C. K., Burns, W. J., & Peters, E. (2013). Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 198–212. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zokaityte, A. (2016). Financial literacy and numeracy of consumers and retail investors. Capital Markets Law Journal, 11(3), 405–413. CrossRef Zokaityte, A. (2016). Financial literacy and numeracy of consumers and retail investors. Capital Markets Law Journal, 11(3), 405–413. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
When more is less in financial decision-making: financial literacy magnifies framing effects
Auteurs
Vânia Moreira Costa
Nuno A. De Sá Teixeira
Ana Cordeiro Santos
Eduardo Santos
Publicatiedatum
19-06-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01372-7