Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Despite increased interest in the processes guiding action observation and observational learning, we know little about what people think they learn from watching, how well perceptions of learning marry with actual ability and how ability perceptions develop across multiple observation trials. Based on common coding ideas, we would think that ability and perceptions of ability from watching should be well matched. We conducted two studies to answer these questions that involved repeated observation of a 2-ball juggling task. After each video observation, observers judged if they could perform the skill and gave a confidence score (0–100 %). In Experiment 1, an Observe-only group was compared to an Observe + Physical practice and No-practice group. Both observer groups showed a better physical approximation of the juggling action after practice and in retention and their confidence increased in a linear fashion. Confidence showed a small, yet significant relationship to actual success. In Experiment 2, we limited physical practice to 5 attempts (across 50 observation trials). In general, people who had high perceptions of ability following a demonstration were overconfident, whereas those with lower perceptions of ability were accurate in their assessments. Confidence generally increased across practice, particularly for trials following observation rather than physical practice. We conclude that while perceptions of ability and actual ability show congruence across trials and individuals, observational practice increases people’s confidence in their ability to perform a skill, even despite physical experiences to the contrary.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Adams, J. A. (1986). Use of the model’s knowledge of results to increase the observer’s performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 89–98.
Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1016–1109. CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (4th ed., pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.
Beek, P. J. (1989). Juggling dynamics. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
Beilock, S. L., Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2008). Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 13269–13273. CrossRef
Burke, C. J., Tobler, P. N., Baddeley, M., & Schultz, W. (2010). Neural mechanisms of observational learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 14431–14436. CrossRef
Clark, S. E., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2002). Peer mastery versus peer coping models: model type has differential effects on psychological and physical performance measures. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 43, 179–196.
Crossman, E. (1959). A theory of the acquisition of speed-skill. Ergonomics, 2, 153–166. CrossRef
Dickinson, J., Weeks, D., Randall, B., & Goodman, D. (2004). One-trial motor learning. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory, and practice (pp. 63–83). London: Routledge.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Feltz, D. L., Landers, D. M., & Raeder, U. (1979). Enhancing self-efficacy in high-avoidance motor tasks: a comparison of modeling techniques. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1, 112–122.
Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000). The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 185–207. CrossRef
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral Brain Science, 24, 849–878. CrossRef
Iacoboni, M. (2005). Neural mechanisms of imitation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 623–637. CrossRef
Kitsantas, A., Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. (2000). The role of observation and emulation in the development of athletic self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 811–817. CrossRef
Law, B., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2005). Effects of self-modeling on figure skating jump performance and psychological variables. European Journal of Sport Science, 5, 143–152. CrossRef
Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2012). Motor learning through a motivational lens. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 173–191). London: Routledge.
Maslovat, D., Hayes, S. J., Horn, R., & Hodges, N. J. (2010). Motor learning through observation. In D. Elliot & M. Khan (Eds.), Vision and action: the control of goal-directed movement (pp. 315–339). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Maslovat, D., Hodges, N.J., Krigolson, O., & Handy, T. (2010). Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 119–130.
McCullagh, P., Law, B., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2012). Modeling and performance. In S. Murphy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of sport and performance psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154. CrossRef
Prinz, W., & Hommel, B. (2002). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance (XIX ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ram, N., & McCullagh, P. (2003). Self-Modeling: influence on psychological response and physical performance. Sport Psychologist, 17, 220–222.
Randall, W. E., Dickinson, J., & Goodman, D. (1995). Studies in one-trial motor learning. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 29, 229–249.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2006). Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American, 295, 30–37. CrossRef
Scully, D. M., & Newell, K. M. (1985). The acquisition of motor skills: toward a visual perception perspective. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 169–187.
Zentgraf, K., & Munzert, J. (2009). Motor imagery and its implications for understanding the motor system. Progress in Brain Research, 174, 219–229. PubMed
- What we think we learn from watching others: the moderating role of ability on perceptions of learning from observation
Nicola J. Hodges
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg