Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

05-12-2022

What is measured by the composite, single-item pain/discomfort dimension of the EQ-5D-5L? An exploratory analysis

Auteurs: Lidia Engel, David G. T. Whitehurst, Juanita Haagsma, M. F. Janssen, Brendan Mulhern

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines the EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort dimension by drawing comparisons with five other pain and discomfort items (pain severity, discomfort severity, pain frequency, discomfort frequency and pain interference) collected in the Australian psychometric study for the EQ Health and Wellbeing instrument.

Methods

Participants, recruited via a market research company, completed an online survey. Methods of analyses included the assessment of descriptive statistics, variation in reporting patterns using chi-square tests and cross-tabulations, correlation analyses, ordered univariate logistic regression, and discriminatory power analyses (Shannon index (H′) and Shannon Evenness index (J′)).

Results

Survey data from 514 participants were used. Compared with EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort, there was a higher proportion of respondents reporting some level of impairment on at least one of the pain severity and discomfort severity items (74% versus 81%). Correlation with EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort was strongest for pain severity (r = 0.83) and weakest for discomfort frequency (r = 0.41); the same inferences were drawn for predictive ability. Adding any additional pain or discomfort items to the EQ-5D-5L increased the absolute informativity (H′) but not the relative informativity (J′). When replacing EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort with separate pain and/or discomfort items – i.e., adding items to a modified ‘EQ-4D-5L’—absolute informativity increased, while relative informativity increased only when pain interference and frequency-related items (independently or in combination) were added.

Conclusion

The EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort dimension captures aspects of pain more than aspects of discomfort. Potential reasons include the absence of descriptors or because pain is mentioned first in the composite item.
Literatuur
4.
go back to reference Kennedy-Martin, M., Slaap, B., Herdman, M., van Reenen, M., Kennedy-Martin, T., Greiner, W., Busschbach, J., & Boye, K. S. (2020). Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European Journal of Health Economics, 21(8), 1245–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kennedy-Martin, M., Slaap, B., Herdman, M., van Reenen, M., Kennedy-Martin, T., Greiner, W., Busschbach, J., & Boye, K. S. (2020). Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European Journal of Health Economics, 21(8), 1245–1257. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10198-020-01195-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Szende, A., Oppe, M., & Devlin, N., (2007) EQ-5D Value sets: Inventory, comparative review and user guide. EuroQol Group Monographs, (vol. 2). Springer Szende, A., Oppe, M., & Devlin, N., (2007) EQ-5D Value sets: Inventory, comparative review and user guide. EuroQol Group Monographs, (vol. 2). Springer
7.
go back to reference Gudex, C. (2005). The descriptive system of the EuroQol instrument. In P. Kind, R. Brooks, & R. Rabin (Eds.), EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history (pp. 19–27). Springer.CrossRef Gudex, C. (2005). The descriptive system of the EuroQol instrument. In P. Kind, R. Brooks, & R. Rabin (Eds.), EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history (pp. 19–27). Springer.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fox-Rushby, J. (2005). First steps to assessing semantic equivalence of the EuroQol instrument: Results of a questionnaire survey to members of the EuroQol group. In P. Kind, R. Brooks, & R. Rabin (Eds.), EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history (pp. 35–52). Springer.CrossRef Fox-Rushby, J. (2005). First steps to assessing semantic equivalence of the EuroQol instrument: Results of a questionnaire survey to members of the EuroQol group. In P. Kind, R. Brooks, & R. Rabin (Eds.), EQ-5D concepts and methods: A developmental history (pp. 35–52). Springer.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brazier, J., Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C., Marten, O., Kreimeier, S., Luo, N., Mulhern, B., Pickard, A. S., Augustovski, F., Greiner, W., Engel, L., Belizan, M., Yang, Z., Monteiro, A., Kuharic, M., Gibbons, L., Ludwig, K., Carlton, J., Connell, J., … Rejon-Parrilla, J. C. (2022). The EQ-HWB: Overview of the development of a measure of health and wellbeing and key results. Value Health, 25(4), 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.009CrossRefPubMed Brazier, J., Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C., Marten, O., Kreimeier, S., Luo, N., Mulhern, B., Pickard, A. S., Augustovski, F., Greiner, W., Engel, L., Belizan, M., Yang, Z., Monteiro, A., Kuharic, M., Gibbons, L., Ludwig, K., Carlton, J., Connell, J., … Rejon-Parrilla, J. C. (2022). The EQ-HWB: Overview of the development of a measure of health and wellbeing and key results. Value Health, 25(4), 482–491. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2022.​01.​009CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Carlton, J., Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C., Connell, J., Brazier, J., Ludwig, K., Marten, O., Kreimeier, S., Engel, L., Belizan, M., Yang, Z., Monteiro, A., Kuharic, M., Luo, N., Mulhern, B., Greiner, W., Pickard, S., & Augustovski, F. (2022). Generation, selection, and face validation of items for a new generic measure of quality of life: The EQ-HWB. Value Health, 25(4), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.12.007CrossRefPubMed Carlton, J., Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C., Connell, J., Brazier, J., Ludwig, K., Marten, O., Kreimeier, S., Engel, L., Belizan, M., Yang, Z., Monteiro, A., Kuharic, M., Luo, N., Mulhern, B., Greiner, W., Pickard, S., & Augustovski, F. (2022). Generation, selection, and face validation of items for a new generic measure of quality of life: The EQ-HWB. Value Health, 25(4), 512–524. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2021.​12.​007CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C., Brazier, J., Marten, O., Kreimeier, S., Luo, N., Mulhern, B., Greiner, W., Pickard, A. S., Augustovski, F., Engel, L., Gibbons, L., Yang, Z., Monteiro, A. L., Kuharic, M., Belizan, M., & Bjorner, J. (2022). Developing a new generic health and wellbeing measure: Psychometric survey results for the EQ-HWB. Value Health, 25(4), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1361CrossRefPubMed Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C., Brazier, J., Marten, O., Kreimeier, S., Luo, N., Mulhern, B., Greiner, W., Pickard, A. S., Augustovski, F., Engel, L., Gibbons, L., Yang, Z., Monteiro, A. L., Kuharic, M., Belizan, M., & Bjorner, J. (2022). Developing a new generic health and wellbeing measure: Psychometric survey results for the EQ-HWB. Value Health, 25(4), 525–533. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2021.​11.​1361CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference van Dongen-Leunis, A., Redekop, W. K., & Uyl-de Groot, C. A. (2016). Which questionnaire should be used to measure quality-of-life utilities in patients with acute leukemia? An evaluation of the validity and interpretability of the EQ-5D-5L and preference-based questionnaires derived from the EORTC QLQ-C30. Value Health, 19(6), 834–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.008CrossRefPubMed van Dongen-Leunis, A., Redekop, W. K., & Uyl-de Groot, C. A. (2016). Which questionnaire should be used to measure quality-of-life utilities in patients with acute leukemia? An evaluation of the validity and interpretability of the EQ-5D-5L and preference-based questionnaires derived from the EORTC QLQ-C30. Value Health, 19(6), 834–843. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2016.​05.​008CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Bryan, S., Jowett, S., Hardyman, W., and Bentham, P., 2004 Does the EQ-5D ‘"nxiety/depression" item measure anxiety, depression, both or neither?. In 21st Scientific Plenary Meeting of the EuroQol Group. Chicago, US Bryan, S., Jowett, S., Hardyman, W., and Bentham, P., 2004 Does the EQ-5D ‘"nxiety/depression" item measure anxiety, depression, both or neither?. In 21st Scientific Plenary Meeting of the EuroQol Group. Chicago, US
Metagegevens
Titel
What is measured by the composite, single-item pain/discomfort dimension of the EQ-5D-5L? An exploratory analysis
Auteurs
Lidia Engel
David G. T. Whitehurst
Juanita Haagsma
M. F. Janssen
Brendan Mulhern
Publicatiedatum
05-12-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03312-x