What Did I Say? Versus What Did I Think? Attributing False Beliefs to Self Amongst Children With and Without Autism
- 01-06-2009
- Original Paper
- Auteurs
- David M. Williams
- Francesca Happé
- Gepubliceerd in
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 6/2009
share
DELEN
Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)
-
Optie A:
-
Optie B:Deel de link per e-mail
Abstract
The task used most widely to assess recognition of false belief in self and others is the ‘Smarties’ unexpected contents task. Amongst individuals with and without autism, the Self and Other-person test questions of this task are of an equivalent level of difficulty. However, a potential confound with this task may allow the Self test question to be passed without false belief competence. Three groups of participants (with autism, developmental disability and typical development) undertook a new unexpected contents task which did not suffer from this confound. The main finding was that participants with autism performed significantly less well on the Self test question than the Other-person test question on this new task. Individuals with autism may have greater difficulty representing their own beliefs than the beliefs of other people.
- Titel
- What Did I Say? Versus What Did I Think? Attributing False Beliefs to Self Amongst Children With and Without Autism
- Auteurs
-
David M. Williams
Francesca Happé
- Publicatiedatum
- 01-06-2009
- Uitgeverij
- Springer US
- Gepubliceerd in
-
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432 - DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0695-6
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.