Ga naar de hoofdinhoud
Top

What Did I Say? Versus What Did I Think? Attributing False Beliefs to Self Amongst Children With and Without Autism

  • 01-06-2009
  • Original Paper
Gepubliceerd in:
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The task used most widely to assess recognition of false belief in self and others is the ‘Smarties’ unexpected contents task. Amongst individuals with and without autism, the Self and Other-person test questions of this task are of an equivalent level of difficulty. However, a potential confound with this task may allow the Self test question to be passed without false belief competence. Three groups of participants (with autism, developmental disability and typical development) undertook a new unexpected contents task which did not suffer from this confound. The main finding was that participants with autism performed significantly less well on the Self test question than the Other-person test question on this new task. Individuals with autism may have greater difficulty representing their own beliefs than the beliefs of other people.
Titel
What Did I Say? Versus What Did I Think? Attributing False Beliefs to Self Amongst Children With and Without Autism
Auteurs
David M. Williams
Francesca Happé
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2009
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0695-6
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.