Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1757-1146-1-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
All authors assisted with drafting the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research ( JFAR) is a new, open access peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. JFAR is the official research publication of the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists (UK) and the Australasian Podiatry Council. However, the Editorial Board encourages submission from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care.
JFAR builds upon a long and proud history of scholarly publication in the podiatry profession. The first foot-related journal in the UK, The Chiropodist, was published by the National Society of Chiropodists in January 1914. The National Society of Chiropodists was wound up in 1915, to be replaced with the Incorporated Society of Chiropodists, which published its first journal as a continuation of The Chiropodist. Following the amalgamation of the Incorporated Society of Chiropodists with four other bodies at the end of 1945, the newly formed Society of Chiropodists produced its first journal, still called The Chiropodist, in January 1946. This incarnation of the journal was continuous up until January 1989, when it was merged with the British Journal of Chiropody (originally the journal of the British Association of Chiropodists, later becoming an independent outlet after the Association merged with the Society of Chiropodists in 1945). The new journal was still called The Chiropodist, but with a new sub-title: The Journal of British Podiatric Medicine, which became the full title in 1991. The final manifestation of the journal – the British Journal of Podiatry – represented a merger between The Journal of British Podiatric Medicine and the British Journal of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, which occurred in response to the amalgamation of the Podiatry Association, the Association of Chief Chiropody Officers and the Society of Chiropodists to form the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists in 1998 [ 1]. Cover images of the three main phases of the UK journal are shown in Figure 1.
The chiropody/podiatry profession in Australia and New Zealand was strongly influenced by the UK model, and despite considerable delays in the dispatch processes of the journal, it would appear that The Chiropodist did have a small number of eager subscribers in "The Colonies" (Figure 2). However, it was not until 1966 that the first podiatry journal in Australia (the Australian Journal of Chiropody) was published. This journal was renamed the Australian Podiatrist in 1974. Most recently, following the amalgamation of the Australian Podiatry Council and the New Zealand Society of Podiatrists to form the Australasian Podiatry Council in 1997, the Australian Podiatrist merged with the New Zealand Journal of Podiatric Medicine to form the Australasian Journal of Podiatric Medicine (see Figure 3).
The late 1990s witnessed an ongoing debate regarding the future of scholarly publishing in the Australasian and UK podiatry professions which arose from two related issues: the growing need for podiatry researchers to publish in high profile journals, and the drive towards internationalisation [ 2– 5]. During this period, it was clear that sustaining the two 'local' journals as credible research publications was becoming increasingly difficult [ 6], as podiatry researchers were turning to more prestigious, higher profile journals indexed by Medline [ 7, 8]. Indeed, a survey of podiatry academic staff in Australia revealed that the British Journal of Podiatry and the Australasian Journal of Podiatric Medicine were considered to be the least prestigious of all foot and ankle publications, and that academic staff considered inclusion in Medline to be the most important factor to consider when selecting a journal to publish in [ 7].
In 2005, tentative steps were taken to extend the degree of collaboration between the two organisation's journals via the reciprocal publication of selected papers (so-called 'international papers'). Finally, following several discussions between 2005 and 2006, including a meeting held during the 21 st Australasian Podiatry Conference in Christchurch (see Figure 4), the Australasian Podiatry Council and Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists reached an agreement to develop a new journal. Subsequently, the final edition of the British Journal of Podiatry (Vol. 10, No. 4) was published in November 2007 [ 9], and the final edition of the Australasian Journal of Podiatric Medicine (Vol. 41, No. 3) was published in December 2007 [ 10], paving the way for the development of the new journal, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research (JFAR).
The re-evaluation of scholarly publishing by the Australasian Podiatry Council and Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists coincided with a major upheaval in biomedical publishing. Motivated by the growth of the internet and a desire to enable wider access to scientific information, the concept of open access publishing gathered considerable momentum in the late 1990s [ 11– 14]. Open access publishing enables researchers to submit manuscripts to web-based journals that can be downloaded free of charge by anyone with an internet connection, with no subscription or registration barriers. The costs of publishing are borne by the author, or, in most cases, by the author's institution or funding body. In this way, access to scholarly information is vastly increased, and the costs of publishing research are contained. BioMed Central [ 15], the publisher of JFAR, is the world's largest open access publishing company, and currently produces 186 journals.
Open access publishing with Biomed Central offers several significant benefits over the traditional publication model [ 16], including:
(i) Rapid peer review: the peer review process in many journals is often frustrating and time-consuming, and may in some cases take over 12 months to complete. For JFAR, this process is streamlined due to BioMed Central's web-based system for submission and for referees to view manuscripts and return their reviews.
(ii) High visibility and accessibility: publishing in JFAR provides authors with access to a truly global readership in medicine and allied health. PubMed [ 17], the world's most popular literature search service, indexes all research published in BioMed Central journals. It is worth noting that the precursor journals to JFAR – the Australasian Journal of Podiatric Medicine and the British Journal of Podiatry – were not indexed in PubMed, and several current foot and ankle journals, such as Foot and Ankle Surgery and The Foot are also not indexed in PubMed. BioMed Central also participates in CrossRef [ 18] and the Open Citation Project [ 19], allowing direct linking from citations to the full text of the article in a BioMed Central journal.
(iii) Vastly reduced time period between acceptance of a manuscript and its publication: for most journals, it can take between six and 24 months from acceptance of a paper to final availability in hard copy. This delay occurs because of the need to produce paper issues on a monthly, bimonthly or quarterly basis with a fixed number of pages, which can create a substantial publishing backlog. With JFAR, this unnecessary delay is removed, and articles will be published on-line within a few days of editorial acceptance.
(iv) The author retains copyright: with traditional journals, the author transfers ownership of their article to the publisher, who can legally restrict access to the article (even to the point of restricting sharing of the article between colleagues). With open access journals, the author retains copyright and grant any third party the right to use the article freely, as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
(v) Web-based flexibility: traditional print journals are forced to restrict the size of articles due to the cost of producing printed issues. In some journals, articles are restricted to 2,000 words or less, which creates difficulties for authors and may require the deletion of potentially important information. In addition, many journals charge the author for reproduction of colour images. In contrast, the web interface of BioMed Central journals allows for larger articles, and the unrestricted inclusion of non-written material such as high resolution colour photographs, additional datasets and movie files.
Articles published in open access journals are subject to an article processing charge, which helps fund the journal and enables free access to articles worldwide. If the submitting author of a manuscript belongs to an institution that has a subscription to BioMed Central, the article processing charge is waived. There are currently 319 Members and Supporter Members in 34 countries [ 20]. Authors who do not belong to a BioMed Central member institution pay an article processing charge upon publication. However, as part of the agreement formulated between the Australasian Podiatry Council and the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, all Association/Society members who wish to submit a manuscript will have their article processing charge covered.
Scholarly journals exist primarily as an avenue for the dissemination of research findings. For clinical journals, this dissemination should ideally encompass both "researcher to researcher" and "researcher to clinician" transfer of information, in order to educate clinicians and ultimately improve clinical outcomes for patients. However, it has been argued that journals have several broader roles, such as promoting and reforming the professions they serve [ 21]. As JFAR is supported by the premier bodies of the podiatry professions in Australasia and the UK, the journal will inevitably have a strong podiatry emphasis. However, the editors acknowledge that the management of foot conditions encompasses a range of health care professionals [ 22], and that the structure, education and scope of practice of these professions varies considerably between different countries. JFAR will therefore welcome all manuscripts that advance our understanding of foot disorders, irrespective of the professional background or country of origin of the contributing authors. In doing so, we hope to foster greater awareness and collaboration between foot health professionals, and help break down historical, national and political barriers impeding the progress and advancement of foot and ankle care.
JFAR will focus primarily on original research articles, but will also publish editorials, methodology articles, letters to the editor, study protocols and reviews. Case reports will only be considered if they provide unique or important additional insights into the causes or treatment of foot and ankle disorders. In addition, case reports must be evidence-based where good evidence is available [ 23]. Manuscripts submitted to JFAR will initially be reviewed by the editors and subsequently by two external peer reviewers. Reviewers will be asked to indicate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound, relevant and also to indicate the level of interest to foot health professionals.
JFAR operates a fully open peer review system, meaning that the identity of the authors is known to the reviewers, and vice versa. There is no evidence that such a system produces better quality reviews or changes reviewers' recommendations compared to traditional "closed" peer review [ 24]. However, open peer review is a far more transparent system, potentially fosters greater accountability on the part of reviewers, and may also prevent potentially serious abuses of the system (such as reviewers stealing authors' ideas or intentionally slowing the progress of a competitor's manuscript) [ 21]. All correspondence pertaining to the peer review process, including peer reviewers' comments, authors' replies and revisions of the manuscript will be freely accessible from the 'prepublication history' section of each article published on the JFAR website.
Within a few days after acceptance in JFAR, provisional versions of articles will be published on our website [ 25] as Portable Document Files (PDFs). The provisional version corresponds to the manuscript as it appeared upon final acceptance by the editors, and the reference will appear in PubMed as an 'Epub ahead of print'. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions with cross-linked reference lists are made available shortly afterwards. This system allows the full text of research atricles to be rapidly accessible to clinicians and researchers and vastly reduces the turnaround time between submission and publication. Final versions will be accessible and searchable through the JFAR web archives, as well as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and several other scholarly databases. In addition to providing much wider dissemination of research articles (BioMed Central articles have an average of 2,000 downloads in the first 12 months of publication [ 26]), this approach also benefits authors, as open access papers have been shown to attract more citations than non-open access articles [ 27].
The editors of JFAR hope that the journal will be entertaining, educational, provocative and clinically useful to all health care professionals involved in the management of foot and ankle disorders. We look forward to receiving your submissions, general feedback as to how the journal is progressing and suggestions for how it can be improved.
The editors would like to sincerely thank all colleagues who have assisted with the development of JFAR, including John Price, Alison Petchell and Graeme Ramsay (former Chief Executive Officers of the Australasian Podiatry Council), Ralph Graham (former Chairman of the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists) and Dr Stefan Busch (Associate Publisher, BioMed Central). We would also like to thank our current Board of Management, including Joanna Brown (Chief Executive Officer, Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists), Kelli Cheales (Chief Executive Officer, Australasian Podiatry Council), Clare Richards (Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists) and Anita Raspovic (Australasian Podiatry Council and former editor of AJPM).
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All authors assisted with drafting the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
go back to reference Anonymous: The Camden Accord - the publications. J Brit Podiatr Med. 1997, 52: 169-170. Anonymous: The Camden Accord - the publications. J Brit Podiatr Med. 1997, 52: 169-170.
go back to reference Anonymous: International journals. Brit J Podiatr. 1999, 2: 102- Anonymous: International journals. Brit J Podiatr. 1999, 2: 102-
go back to reference Potter M, McCulloch A: Future plans for the British Journal of Podiatry. Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 6: 91- Potter M, McCulloch A: Future plans for the British Journal of Podiatry. Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 6: 91-
go back to reference Potter M: Sustaining a high-quality professional journal . Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 7: 63- Potter M: Sustaining a high-quality professional journal . Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 7: 63-
go back to reference Raspovic A: Re-appraisal of the role of the Australian Journal of Podiatric Medicine. Australas J Podiatr Med. 2002, 36: 34,54- Raspovic A: Re-appraisal of the role of the Australian Journal of Podiatric Medicine. Australas J Podiatr Med. 2002, 36: 34,54-
go back to reference Menz HB: Local podiatry journals are unsustainable. Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 7: 116- Menz HB: Local podiatry journals are unsustainable. Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 7: 116-
go back to reference Menz HB: Publication patterns and perceptions of the Australian podiatric medical faculty. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001, 91: 210-218. CrossRefPubMed Menz HB: Publication patterns and perceptions of the Australian podiatric medical faculty. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001, 91: 210-218. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Borthwick AM: 'Publish and be damned': disseminating contemporary podiatric research. Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 7: 91-92. Borthwick AM: 'Publish and be damned': disseminating contemporary podiatric research. Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 7: 91-92.
go back to reference Borthwick AM, Richards C: Continuity in change: the evolving journal. Brit J Podiatr. 2007, 10: 125-126. Borthwick AM, Richards C: Continuity in change: the evolving journal. Brit J Podiatr. 2007, 10: 125-126.
go back to reference Raspovic A: Editor's goodbye. Australas J Podiatr Med. 2007, 41: 38,56- Raspovic A: Editor's goodbye. Australas J Podiatr Med. 2007, 41: 38,56-
go back to reference Delamothe T, Smith R: Moving beyond journals: the future arrives with a crash. BMJ. 1999, 318: 1637-1639. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Delamothe T, Smith R: Moving beyond journals: the future arrives with a crash. BMJ. 1999, 318: 1637-1639. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Smith R: Electronic publishing in science - the revolution is just beginning. BMJ. 2001, 322: 627-629. 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.627. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith R: Electronic publishing in science - the revolution is just beginning. BMJ. 2001, 322: 627-629. 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.627. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Delamothe T: Open access publishing takes off. BMJ. 2004, 328: 1-3. 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.1. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Delamothe T: Open access publishing takes off. BMJ. 2004, 328: 1-3. 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.1. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Frankish H: Publishing wars. Lancet. 2004, 364: 1391-1392. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17242-5. CrossRefPubMed Frankish H: Publishing wars. Lancet. 2004, 364: 1391-1392. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17242-5. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference BioMed Central - the Open Access Publisher. [ http://www.biomedcentral.com] BioMed Central - the Open Access Publisher. [ http://www.biomedcentral.com]
go back to reference BioMedCentral: Why publish in BioMed Central?. [ http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/faq?name=why] BioMedCentral: Why publish in BioMed Central?. [ http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/faq?name=why]
go back to reference crossref.org - DOIs for research content . [ http://www.crossref.org/] crossref.org - DOIs for research content . [ http://www.crossref.org/]
go back to reference OpCit - the Open Citation Project. [ http://opcit.eprints.org/] OpCit - the Open Citation Project. [ http://opcit.eprints.org/]
go back to reference Smith R: The Trouble with Medical Journals. 2006, London , The Royal Society of Medicine Press Smith R: The Trouble with Medical Journals. 2006, London , The Royal Society of Medicine Press
go back to reference Jones CL: Who treats feet?. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1995, 85: 293-294. CrossRefPubMed Jones CL: Who treats feet?. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1995, 85: 293-294. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Godlee F: Applying research evidence to individual patients. Evidence based case reports will help. BMJ. 1998, 316: 1621-1622. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Godlee F: Applying research evidence to individual patients. Evidence based case reports will help. BMJ. 1998, 316: 1621-1622. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference vanRooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R: Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ. 1999, 318: 23-27. CrossRef vanRooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R: Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ. 1999, 318: 23-27. CrossRef
go back to reference Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. [ http://www.jfootankleres.com] Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. [ http://www.jfootankleres.com]
go back to reference Eysenbach G: Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4: e157-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eysenbach G: Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4: e157-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
- Welcome to Journal of Foot and Ankle Research: a new open access journal for foot health professionals
Hylton B Menz
Mike J Potter
Alan M Borthwick
Karl B Landorf
- BioMed Central