Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

1. Wat is bekend? Een aantal perspectieven

Auteur : Drs. F. A. W. M. Derksen

Gepubliceerd in: Empathie in de spreekkamer

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk wil ik de lezer laten zien hoe empathie past binnen een arts-patiëntconsult. Tevens beschrijf ik wetenschappelijk aangetoonde effecten van empathie, de geschiedenis van empathie en de meest voorkomende barrières voor empathisch gedrag. Ik sluit dit hoofdstuk af met een overzicht van neurofysiologische en endocrinologische aspecten van empathie.

volgende hoofdstuk Wezenlijke randgebieden

Levinas E. Humanism of The Other: University of Illinois Press; 2005.

Baart A. Aandacht, Etudes in presentie. Utrecht: Lemma BV; 2005.

Nussbaum MC, editor. Creating Capabilities Harvard University Press; 2013.

Gillespie H, Kelly M, Gormley G, King N, Gilliland D, Dornan T. How can tomorrow's doctors be more caring? A phenomenological investigation. Med Educ. 2018; 52(10): 1052-63.PubMed

Van Vliet M, Van der Wall E, Plum NM, Bensing JM. Explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment when entering palliative breast cancer care: findings from a scripted video-vignette study. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10; 31(26):3242-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.5865.CrossRefPubMed

Donner-Banzhoff N, Hertwig R. Inductive foraging: improving the diagnostic yield of primary care consultations. Europ J Gen Pract. 2014; 20(1): 69-73.

Houwen J, Lucassen PLBJ, Stappers HW, Assendelft WJ, van Dulmen S, et al. Improving GP communication in consultations on medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative interview study with patients in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2017; 67: e717-e723. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X692537CrossRef

Donner-Banzhoff N. Solving the Diagnostic Challenge: A Patient-Centered Approach. Ann Fam Med. 2018; 16(4): 353-8.PubMedPubMedCentral

Ekman I, Swedberg K, Taft C, Lindseth A, Norberg A, Brink E, et al. Person-centered care--ready for prime time. Eur J. Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011; 10(4): 248-51.PubMed

10.

Lindstrom B, Eriksson M. Contextualizing salutogenesis and Antonovsky in public health development. Health Promot Int. 2006; 21(3): 238-44.PubMed

11.

Mercer SW, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland--a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73(2): 240-5.PubMed

12.

Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, et al. How should we define health? BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2011; 343: d4163.

13.

Derksen F.A.W.M., Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. The effectiveness of empathy in general practice; a systematic review. Brit J Gen Pract. 2013; January.

14.

Mazzi MA, Bensing J, Rimondini M, Fletcher I, van Vliet L, et al. How do lay people assess the quality of physician’s communicative responses to patients’emotional cues and concerns? An international multicentre study based on videotaped medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Mar; 90(3): 347-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.010.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Deledda G, Moretti F, Rimondini M, Zimmermann C. How patients want their doctor to communicate. A literature review on primary care patients’ perspective. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Mar; 90 (3): 297-306. 2013 Mar; 90(3): 297-306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.005.

16.

Donner-Banzhoff N, Hertwig R. Inductive foraging: improving the diagnostic yield of primary care consultations. Eur. J Gen Pract. 2014; 20 (1): 69-73. Doi: 103109/13814788.2013.805197CrossRefPubMed

17.

Mercer S, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G. General practitioner empathy patient enablement and patient reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio economic deprivation in scotland. A pilot prospective study using structural equation modelling. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov; 73 (2): 240-245.

18.

Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer SW, Warm M, et al. Determinants and patient reported long term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec; 69 (1-3): 63-75.PubMed

19.

Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender r, Rabinowitz C, et al. Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med. 2011 Mar; 86(3): 359-64.

20.

Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, Wang X, Rossi G, et al. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma. Acad Med. 2012 Sep; 87(9): 1243-49.PubMed

21.

Lee YY, Lin JL. The effects of trust in physician on self efficacy, adherence and diabetes outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar; 68 (6): 1060-68.PubMed

22.

Rakel D, Barrett B, Zhang Z, Hoeft T, Chewning B, et al. Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: effects on the common cold. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec; 85 (3): 390-397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Fuertes JN, Boylan LS, Fontanella JA. Behavioral indices in medical care outcome: The working alliance, adherence and related factors. J Gen Int Med. 2009 Jan; 24 (1): 80-85.

24.

Charron R. Narrative medicine honoring the stories of illness. Oxford University Press, 2006.

25.

Van Dulmen S, Bensing J. Health promoting effects of the physician patient encounter. Psych Health Med. 2002; 7 (3): 289-99.

26.

Buszewicz M, Pistrang N, Barker C, Cape J, Martin J. Patient’experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems. Br. J Gen Pract. 2006 Jul;, 56 (528): 496-503.PubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Levinson W, Roter D. Physicians psychosocial beliefs correlate with their patient comminication skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Jul; 10(7): 375-379.PubMed

28.

Ogle J, Bushnell JA, Caputi P. Empathy is related to clinical competence in medical care. Med Educ. 2013 Aug; 47 (8): 824-831.PubMed

29.

Kraft-Todd GT. Empathic non verbal behavior increases ratings of both warmt and competence in a medical context. PLOS One. 2017; 5: e0177758.

30.

Pereira L, Figueiredo-Braga M, Carvalho IP. Preoperative anxiety in ambulatory surgery: the impact of an empathic patient centered approach on psychological and clinical outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May; 99(5): 733-8.PubMed

31.

Van Vliet LM, Francke AL, Meijers MC, Westendorp J, Hoffstadt H, et al. The use of expectancy and empathy when communicating with patients with advanced breast cancer; an observational study of clinician patient consultations. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul; (10): 464. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centered care is associated with decreased health and care utilization. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 May; 24 (3): 229-239.PubMed

33.

Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997 Feb; 277(7): 553-9.

34.

Roter D, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M, Stiles W, et al. Communication patterns of primary care physicians JAMA. 1997 Jan ; 277 (4): 350- 356.PubMed

35.

Neumann M, Bensing J, Mercer SW, Ernstmann N, Ommen O, et al. Analyzing the nature and specific effectiveness of clinical empathy: a Theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory based research agenda. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar; 74 (3): 339-346.PubMed

36.

Halpern J. Clinical empathy in medical care, in: J. Decety (Ed.), Empathy from Bench to Bedside, The MIT Press, Cambridge 2012 (2016) 228–244, doi: https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262016612.003.0013.

37.

Robieux L, Karsenti L, Pocard M, Flahault C. Let’s talk about empathy! Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jan; 101(1): 59-66.PubMed

38.

Meng Shi, Tianjiao Du,. Associations of emotional intelligence and gratitude with empathy in medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2020, 20, 116PubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Bloom P. Against Empathy – The case for rational compassion. New York, 2016.

40.

Devisch I. Het Empatisch Teveel. Op naar een werkbare onverschilligheid. De Bezige Bij. Amsterdam 2017.

41.

Garden R. Expanding Clinical empathy: an activist perspective. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 24(1): 122–125.PubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Titchener E. A beginner's psychology. New York: Macmillan; 1915.

43.

Rifkin J, The Empathic civilization. The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis. Polity Press, Cambridge 2009.

44.

Lipps T. Psychological Studies. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1926.

45.

Idem als 2

46.

Quispel G. Valentinus, de gnosticus en zijn evangelie der waarheid. 2003. Amsterdam. In de Pelikaan.

47.

Compagnon A. Een Zomer met Montaigne. Amsterdam: Athenaeum- Polak & Van Gennep; 2014.

48.

Montaigne de M. De Essays. Amsterdam: Athenaeum, Polak & van Gennep; 2004.

49.

Husserl E. Filosofie als strenge wetenschap. Meppel: Boom; 1981

50.

Widdershoven G, Boer de T. Hermeneutiek in discussie. Delft: Eburon; 1990.

51.

Levinas E. Humanism of the Other. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 2006.

52.

Buber M. Ik en jij. Utrecht: Bijleveld; 2003.

53.

Ricoeur P. Soi- même comme un autre1990.

54.

Kohut H. The analysis of the self 1971, New York, International Universities.

55.

Rogers C. On becoming a person; a therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mufflin Company; 1961.

56.

Rogers C. Empathic: an unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist. 1975; 5: 2-10.

57.

Konrath SH. Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta analysis. Personality and Social Psychology review, 2010, 20, 1-19.

58.

Misra S, Cheng L, Genevie J. The Iphone effect; the quality of in person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices environment and behavior. Environment and Behavior. 2014; 48(2): 275-298. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755.CrossRef

59.

Buber M. Ik en jij. Erven Bijleveld Utrecht 1958

60.

Harris LT, Fiske ST. Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17 (10): 847–853.PubMed

61.

Hadjittofi M, Gleeson K, Arben A. The experience of disgust by healthcare professionals: a literature review. Int J of Nursing Studies. 2020; 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inurstu.2020

62.

Konrath SH. Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta analysis. Personality and Social Psychology review. 2010; 20: 1-19.

63.

Krznaric R. Empathie een revolutionair boek 2014 pag. 71 e.v.

64.

Brown B. De moed van imperfectie, Bruna Uitgevers Utrecht, 2013

65.

Shapiro J. Walking a mile in their patient shoes empathy and othering in medical students education. Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in medicine. 2008; 3: 10

66.

Kanai R, Bahrami B, Duchaine B, Janik A, Banissy MJ, et al. Brain structure links loneliness to social perception. Curr Biol. 2012 Oct; 22 (20): 1975-79. Doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.045CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Bayne H, Neukrug E, Hays D, Britton B. A comprehensive model for optimizing empathy in person centred care. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov; 93 (2): 209-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.016CrossRefPubMed

68.

Halpern J. What is clinical empathy. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18: 670-74.PubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Spiro H. The practice of empathy. Acad Med. 2009; 84/9: 1177-1179.PubMed

70.

Idem als 12.

71.

Een ‘hidden curriculum’ is een neveneffect van scholing; het gaat om lessen die niet direct geleerd zijn maar die iedereen wel kent – denk aan de informele maar wel impliciete overdracht van normen, waarden en overtuigingen. De professionele habitus komt er door tot stand en gezagsverhoudingen spelen een rol.

72.

Seeberger A, Lonn A, Hult H, Weurlander M, Wernerson A. Can empathy be preserved in medical education? Int J of Med Educ. 2020; 11: 83-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5e83.31cf.CrossRef

73.

Neumann M, Bensing J, Mercer SW, Ernstmann N, Ommen O, Pfaff H. Analyzing the nature and specific effectiveness of clinical empathy: a Theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory based research agenda. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar; 74(3): 339-346.PubMed

74.

Lown BA. A social neuroscience-informed model for teaching and practising compassion in health care. Med Educ. 2016; 50(3): 332-42.PubMed

75.

Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual review of neuroscience. 2004; 27: 169-92.PubMed

76.

Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain: a journal of neurology. 1996; 119 (Pt 2): 593-609.

77.

Idem als 3.

78.

Carr L, Iacoboni M, Dubeau MC, Mazziotta JC, Lenzi GL. Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003; 100(9): 497-502.

79.

Kaplan JT, Iacoboni M. Getting a grip on other minds: mirror neurons, intention understanding, and cognitive empathy. Social neuroscience. 2006; 1(3-4): 175-83.PubMed

80.

Keysers C. Het empatische brein. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker; 2012.

81.

Bastiaansen JA, Thioux M, Keysers C. Evidence for mirror systems in emotions. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2009; 364(1528): 2391-404.PubMedPubMedCentral

82.

Lamm C, Nusbaum HC, Meltzoff AN, Decety J. What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain. PloS one. 2007; 2(12): e1292.

83.

Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science (New York, NY). 2004; 303(5661): 1157-62

84.

Fadiga L, Fogassi l, Rizolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol. 1995; 73: 2608-2611.

85.

Iacoboni M. Het spiegelende brein. Nieuwezijds. Amsterdam 2008.

86.

Idem als 13.

87.

Gallese V. The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology. 2003; 36(4): 171-80.PubMed

88.

Gazzola V, Aziz-Zadeh L, Keysers C. Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Current biology. 2006; 16(18): 1824-9.PubMed

89.

Idem als 9.

90.

Baron-Cohen S. Zero degrees of Empathy. London: Penguin Books; 2012.

91.

Idem als 10.

92.

Fan Y, Duncan NW, de Greck M, Northoff G. Is there a core neural network in empathy? An fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2011; 35(3): 903-11.PubMed

93.

Idem als 6.

94.

Idem als 7.

95.

Idem als 11.

96.

Morrison I, Peelen MV, Downing PE. The sight of others’ pain modulates motor processing in human cingulate cortex. Cerebral cortex (New York, NY: 1991). 2007; 17(9): 2214-22.

97.

Rapp AM, Leube DT, Erb M, Grodd W, Kircher TT. Neural correlates of metaphor processing. Brain Cognitive Brain Research. 2004.;20 (03): 395-402.

98.

Jueptner M, Weiller C. Review: does measurement of regional cerebral blood flow reflect synaptic activity? Implications for PET and fMRI. NeuroImage. 1995; 2(2): 148-56.PubMed

99.

Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008; 453(7197): 869-78.PubMed

100.

Idem als 19.

101.

Chapman E, Baron-Cohen S, Auyeung B, Knickmeyer R, Taylor K, Hackett G. Fetal testosterone and empathy: evidence from the empathy quotient (EQ) and the "reading the mind in the eyes" test. Social neuroscience. 2006; 1(2): 135-48.PubMed

102.

Jordan-Young R. Brain Storm. The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press; 2010.

103.

Domes G, Heinrichs M, Michel A, Berger C, Herpertz SC. Oxytocin improves "mind-reading" in humans. Biol Psychiatry. 2007; 61(6): 731-3.PubMed

104.

Riess H. Biomarkers in the psychotherapeutic relationship: the role of physiology, neurobiology, and biological correlates of E.M.P.A.T.H.Y. Harvard review of psychiatry. 2011; 19(3): 162-74.

105.

Marci C, Riess H. The clinical relevance of psychophysiology: support for the psychobiology of empathy and psychodynamic process. American journal of psychotherapy. 2005; 59(3): 213-26.PubMed

106.

Carsten KW, et al. The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Sience. 2010; 328: 5984.

107.

Bregman R. De meeste mensen deugen. 2019. www.decorrespondent.nl.

108.

Bos P. Verbonden. De biologie van menselijke relaties. 2020. Thomas Rap. Amsterdam.

109.

Idem als 33.

Titel: Wat is bekend? Een aantal perspectieven
Auteur: Drs. F. A. W. M. Derksen
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Empathie in de spreekkamer
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2742-3

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2743-0

Copyright: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2743-0_1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen